Jump to content

User contributions for ChaimRosenberg222

A user with 16 edits. Account created on 20 November 2022.

This account is currently blocked. (Show block details) The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:

View full log
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽

29 December 2023

27 December 2023

26 December 2023

24 December 2023

22 December 2023

  • 13:0613:06, 22 December 2023 diff hist −1,618 m Douglas Murray (author) I will give you an example of a "good faith" edit. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_Fuentes. This wikipedia article of a similar far-right political pundit like Murray does not shy from including negatively associated political adjectives in the header. Why? Because they are demonstrably his views. The actual political bias in these edits is those hiding Murray's views that HE HIMSELF states. Tags: Undo Reverted references removed
  • 12:5712:57, 22 December 2023 diff hist −1,618 m Douglas Murray (author) Your wikipedia edit history is exactly what I am talking about in the summary. Its not up for debate that Douglas Murray is deeply Islamophobic, has said so himself. And believes in the promotion of "white civilization". This is not opinion this is Murray's own words. Tags: Undo Reverted references removed
  • 12:0312:03, 22 December 2023 diff hist −1,609 m Douglas Murray (author) Current version of this article is far too light on Murray's actual views, they are not milquetoast and should be reflected as such. This wikipedia page in particular has a problem with politically biased Far-righters and Zionists edit warring to lighten his views. Tags: Reverted references removed Visual edit: Switched

14 December 2023

  • 16:3916:39, 14 December 2023 diff hist −481 m Matt Petgrave This is not in response to the citation but about the article having a facticity bullet point does not mean it should be included in the wikipedia article instead, especially as a non-sequitor that has no logical consistency to the previous or next sentence. It is only in an attempt to influence the reader's opinion towards the police investigation verdict two sentences ago. Tags: Undo references removed
  • 15:3415:34, 14 December 2023 diff hist −481 m Matt Petgrave Previous version had a random and irrelevant politically motivated sentence inserted into it for no real reason. Tag: references removed

9 November 2023

17 March 2023

20 November 2022