User contributions for CarlFilip19

A user with 56 edits. Account created on 3 December 2023.
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

18 May 2024

17 May 2024

16 May 2024

  • 07:2007:20, 16 May 2024 diff hist +245 Pop-up bookAn entry about a work of fiction that has a pop-up book be a defining feature of its narrative, rather than just having a pop-up book exist in a work. current

11 May 2024

  • 22:1322:13, 11 May 2024 diff hist +25 Killer Bean ForeverSorry, sources should be provided for the release dates, and maybe for the summaries. Well... those shorts are obscure, so I think info about them would be challenged.

8 May 2024

7 May 2024

  • 15:1515:15, 7 May 2024 diff hist −645 Cr1TiKaLThe "unreliable source?" tags are probably right. I am reading the page about perennial sources for this purpose. Dexerto is a sketchy case in the yellow zone, but it is redundant to the more reliable Dot Esports that is used multiple times in this article. Yes, Sportskeeda is in the red zone and therefore a generally unreliable source. The reason? Most of the content is user-written with a lack of editorial oversight. I am being bold.

4 May 2024

27 April 2024

26 April 2024

22 April 2024

20 April 2024

  • 15:5715:57, 20 April 2024 diff hist +513 List of Donkey Kong charactersChunky is not dead. Hehe. I do not see certain paragraphs here be sourced, especially when cameo appearances are harder to find than normal appearances. According to Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources, Screen Rant is in the yellow zone, being considered okay for sourcing information about entertainment. Is there original research in this new paragraph? I do not know. The source says that he can be seen in the arena, not that he can be seen during a scene with the arena. But okay.

25 March 2024

20 March 2024

19 March 2024

18 March 2024

15 March 2024

14 March 2024

  • 21:2921:29, 14 March 2024 diff hist +9 3D printing15 November 2021, this article was protected due to persistent vandalism. I am editing this template because people may appreciate seeing the reason for the article's protection.
  • 21:2921:29, 14 March 2024 diff hist +9 2+211 March 2020, this page was protected due to persistent vandalism. I am editing this template because people may appreciate seeing the reason for the article's protection. Tag: Reverted
  • 21:2621:26, 14 March 2024 diff hist +9 2 + 2 = 510 November 2021, this article was protected due to persistent vandalism. I am editing this template because people may appreciate seeing the reason for the article's protection. Tag: Reverted
  • 21:2521:25, 14 March 2024 diff hist +5 2 (New York City Subway service)8 March 2024, this article was protected due to persistent sockpuppetry. I am editing this template because people may appreciate seeing the reason for the article's protection. Tag: Reverted
  • 21:2321:23, 14 March 2024 diff hist +5 228 December 2022, this article was protected due to persistent vandalism. I am editing this template because people may appreciate seeing the reason for the article's protection.
  • 21:0021:00, 14 March 2024 diff hist −91 1+112 September 2016, this page was protected due to persistent vandalism. I am editing this template because people may appreciate seeing the reason for the article's protection. Tag: Reverted
  • 20:5320:53, 14 March 2024 diff hist +9 .org17 May 2019, this article was protected due to persistent vandalism and other unconstructive editing. I am editing this template because people may appreciate seeing the reason for the article's protection. Tag: Reverted

12 March 2024

6 March 2024

  • 14:5214:52, 6 March 2024 diff hist −114 Augustin-Louis CauchyThat sentence was not well written, since it used weasel wording by saying that "many saw this theorem as Cauchy's most important contribution to mathematics". Which people are "many", where is this research from, and is this sentence needed to understand the article? The sentence can come back when a reliable source supports the sentence's attribution. I am on a small streak of solving MOS:WEASEL. as in unsupported attributions.
  • 14:4114:41, 6 March 2024 diff hist +243 AmberThat sentence is oddly similar to this article from Geology Page, a tertiary source. It is an encyclopedia, but neither an open nor a user-generated one (making it harder for me to publish anything there). I have altered the sentence with different wording. This is also an attempt at combatting weasel wording. I do not know much about Geology Page, since the articles do not link to specific authors, but it has decent reviews on Trustburn, and I let you all revert this edit if it is unhelpful Tag: Reverted

26 February 2024

4 February 2024

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)