User contributions for COice6
A user with 225 edits. Account created on 30 October 2011.
12 November 2013
11 November 2013
- 09:4309:43, 11 November 2013 diff hist +14 m Telekinesis Diction: word should be "Furthermore" instead of "however."
- 09:4109:41, 11 November 2013 diff hist −1 m Telekinesis →Explanations in terms of bias: Moved the meta-analysis to the top
- 09:3709:37, 11 November 2013 diff hist +1,450 Telekinesis Moved the meta-analysis because it's assumption of bias lies on false premises (as explained by the scientists I discuss later in the paragraph). Debatable and thus no longer worthy of being in the lead.
- 05:5705:57, 11 November 2013 diff hist +26 m Talk:Telekinesis →This Article is Biased: diction edit
- 05:5605:56, 11 November 2013 diff hist +85 Talk:Telekinesis Added "This Article is Biased" section
- 05:5505:55, 11 November 2013 diff hist +163 Talk:Telekinesis Added "This Article is Biased" section
- 05:5305:53, 11 November 2013 diff hist +796 Telekinesis Please do not remove this line. This article is obviously biased. The lead should indicate that there is indeed scientific evidence of PK activity, regardless whether people wish to believe in it or not.
- 05:4505:45, 11 November 2013 diff hist +701 Telekinesis →Notable experiments suggesting PK activity
- 05:3605:36, 11 November 2013 diff hist +4 m Telekinesis →Notable experiments suggesting PK activity: added extra space break < br >
- 05:3605:36, 11 November 2013 diff hist +624 Telekinesis →Notable experiments suggesting PK activity: added Jahn and Dunne
- 05:1705:17, 11 November 2013 diff hist +20 Telekinesis →PK activity experiment: Peoc`h has publications in other peer-reviewed journals such as JSPR; additionally, JoSE is peer-reviewed; furthermore, this specific report has been cited by over 32 researchers, including Harvard University; satisfies WP.
- 05:0305:03, 11 November 2013 diff hist +108 m Telekinesis →PK activity experiment: Why was this APA citation removed by 86.140.162.146?
- 04:5504:55, 11 November 2013 diff hist −20 m Telekinesis →PK activity experiment: "Experimenter" could be anyone. "Researcher" is more appropriate. And the last sentence was clunky. Syntax should be "{result} is deemed statistically significant ..." Read: Statistical significance
10 November 2013
- 20:3820:38, 10 November 2013 diff hist +5 m Abductive reasoning Clarity improvement (this stuff may be dense for some, so adding more words to slow down the reading may likely increase comprehension)
- 20:3720:37, 10 November 2013 diff hist +1 m Abductive reasoning Grammar improvement (specification)
7 November 2013
- 17:1517:15, 7 November 2013 diff hist +2 m Telekinesis Formatting fix
- 17:1317:13, 7 November 2013 diff hist +1,050 Telekinesis Added chick-robot study
3 November 2013
- 02:2602:26, 3 November 2013 diff hist −8 m Our Lady of Guadalupe →Technical analyses: semicolon to comma, "therefore" to "so"
- 01:4401:44, 3 November 2013 diff hist +269 Our Lady of Guadalupe →Technical analyses
- 01:3301:33, 3 November 2013 diff hist −320 Our Lady of Guadalupe →Technical analyses: No citation was added (since December 2012) indicating why this tilma should be considered "not unique," so I removed the statement.
- 00:5500:55, 3 November 2013 diff hist +1 m Talk:Our Lady of Guadalupe →How it is possible for this image to exist?: added extra dash to signature
- 00:5400:54, 3 November 2013 diff hist +652 Talk:Our Lady of Guadalupe Asked about how it could be possible for this image to exist.
28 October 2013
- 09:4609:46, 28 October 2013 diff hist −19 Mitragyna speciosa →Use and Safety: Concision; removed "of ''M. speciosa''
- 09:4109:41, 28 October 2013 diff hist −62 Mitragyna speciosa →Use and Safety: "Withdrawal" directly implies that there is physical dependence, so there is no need for redundancy. And I moved the citing away from the bowel citing because they present distinct information. Reorganizations.
- 09:1209:12, 28 October 2013 diff hist −2 m Mitragyna speciosa →Use and Safety: "Several" to "Three"
- 08:5908:59, 28 October 2013 diff hist +66 Mitragyna speciosa It's not "a few reports;" it's one isolated report made over 35 years ago. And context is important; these individuals had used the drug daily for 10-35 years.
- 08:5108:51, 28 October 2013 diff hist +1 Mitragyna speciosa Why shouldn't this "adverse effects" information be in the "Uses and Safety" section?
24 October 2013
- 22:4322:43, 24 October 2013 diff hist +12 m Mitragyna speciosa I read the source referenced and it explicitly states that withdrawal symptoms are "very weak." For some reason, they are nonetheless mentioned in the article lead. I suggest removing it from lead or keep the words "very weak."
23 October 2013
- 04:4504:45, 23 October 2013 diff hist +2 m Mitragyna speciosa I thank the rewording although changed "suggested" to "speculated" because the article says that it's based on speculation, and added "possibly" because the examiner said "possible"--an important word since his basis is conjecture.
- 00:1600:16, 23 October 2013 diff hist +8 m Talk:Mitragyna speciosa →Deaths Involving Kratom: added the word "The" before kratom
- 00:1500:15, 23 October 2013 diff hist +813 Talk:Mitragyna speciosa →Deaths Involving Kratom: Response to Alexbrn
22 October 2013
- 03:3603:36, 22 October 2013 diff hist −2 m Mitragyna speciosa →Toxicity: removed extra space after text
- 03:3503:35, 22 October 2013 diff hist +666 Mitragyna speciosa Undid revision 578209115 by Yobol (talk). The Journal of Plant is international, double-blind, and peer-reviewed; satisfies MEDRS.
- 02:4002:40, 22 October 2013 diff hist +666 Mitragyna speciosa Added toxicity section.
- 02:1202:12, 22 October 2013 diff hist +1,979 Talk:Mitragyna speciosa No edit summary
- 01:0201:02, 22 October 2013 diff hist +40 Mitragyna speciosa Each one of the cited cases points to a case where strong sedatives (opiates or benzodiazepines) were found in the blood of the deceased.
11 April 2013
- 08:0708:07, 11 April 2013 diff hist 0 m The Poem of the Man-God →Criticism: edited a number that I had written (420 BC to 350 BC)
- 08:0508:05, 11 April 2013 diff hist +569 The Poem of the Man-God →Criticism: Exposed the priest's criticisms as baseless, particularly with respect to his claim that screws did not exist in the time of Jesus.
- 07:5007:50, 11 April 2013 diff hist −86 m The Poem of the Man-God →Criticism: I removed "[these and screws as we know them today (i.e., as tools to fasten one thing to another)]." Not only is this completely false, but it this far beyond what the referenced article states.
9 April 2013
- 08:3508:35, 9 April 2013 diff hist −1 m The Poem of the Man-God Removed extraneous quotation mark
8 April 2013
- 01:4101:41, 8 April 2013 diff hist −4 m The Poem of the Man-God →Geography of the Holy Land: Removed "And"
- 01:4001:40, 8 April 2013 diff hist +4 m The Poem of the Man-God →Geography of the Holy Land: Diction. Changed "However," to "Furthermore."
- 01:3601:36, 8 April 2013 diff hist −42 m The Poem of the Man-God →The 15,000 handwritten pages: Revised "Some readers were struck by ..."
7 April 2013
- 18:4718:47, 7 April 2013 diff hist 0 m The Poem of the Man-God capitalization error
- 18:4618:46, 7 April 2013 diff hist +185 m The Poem of the Man-God Better reference added for verbal imprimatur
- 17:5517:55, 7 April 2013 diff hist +729 The Poem of the Man-God It is a misunderstanding to assert that the book was at any point definitively determined as NOT supernatural in origin. In reality, this book would be more accurately described as not definitively supernatural. I elaborate through my edits.
7 March 2013
- 21:4821:48, 7 March 2013 diff hist +1 Talk:Medical cannabis →DEA Judge not a reliable source
- 21:4821:48, 7 March 2013 diff hist +399 m Talk:Medical cannabis →DEA Judge not a reliable source
- 21:3421:34, 7 March 2013 diff hist −85 m Medical cannabis →Brain cancer: The referenced document does not state that THC's cancer-killing mechanisms are unknown. The only stated "unknown" is the molecular basis behind autophagy's ironic dual roles of causing both cancer survival as well as inhibition.
