User contributions for Brad M.

5 February 2009

• 21:3721:37, 5 February 2009 diff hist +1 User talk:Brad M. →The Angry Video Game Nerd
• 21:3721:37, 5 February 2009 diff hist +288 User talk:Brad M. →The Angry Video Game Nerd
• 04:5704:57, 5 February 2009 diff hist +5,602 Angry Video Game Nerd Undid revision 268630003 by A Man In Black (talk)
• 04:5104:51, 5 February 2009 diff hist −440 User talk:Brad M. I plan to go on wikibreak, as soon as you stop acting like a child. Until then, please reaspect my wishes regarding the talkpage.
• 04:4804:48, 5 February 2009 diff hist +5,602 Angry Video Game Nerd Undid revision 268629323 by A Man In Black (talk)
• 04:3904:39, 5 February 2009 diff hist +6,763 Angry Video Game Nerd Undid revision 268623908 by A Man In Black (talk)
• 04:3904:39, 5 February 2009 diff hist −1,161 Angry Video Game Nerd Undid revision 268625063 by 85.197.239.222 (talk)
• 04:3204:32, 5 February 2009 diff hist −4,313 User talk:Brad M. Please do not use this talkpage, as I am on an indefinate wikibreak.
• 04:3104:31, 5 February 2009 diff hist +5 Angry Video Game Nerd Undid revision 268626668 by A Man In Black (talk)
• 03:5503:55, 5 February 2009 diff hist +414 Talk:Angry Video Game Nerd →Examining the sources
• 03:4603:46, 5 February 2009 diff hist +6,763 Angry Video Game Nerd There you go again with misinformation. What exactly have I stomped?

3 February 2009

• 21:3821:38, 3 February 2009 diff hist +6,763 Angry Video Game Nerd Your reasoning is wrong, we have already been over this. For some reason, you just choose not to see what is obvious.
• 17:4717:47, 3 February 2009 diff hist +6,763 Angry Video Game Nerd Undid revision 268283546 by A Man In Black (talk)
• 16:4916:49, 3 February 2009 diff hist +6,763 Angry Video Game Nerd Please don't use such deception when erasing entire sections.

1 February 2009

• 17:0617:06, 1 February 2009 diff hist +346 Talk:Angry Video Game Nerd →Examining the sources
• 16:4216:42, 1 February 2009 diff hist +2,652 Angry Video Game Nerd Ah yes, "use the talk page while I erase the section anyway." You just decided to be reasonable now?
• 16:3816:38, 1 February 2009 diff hist +2,652 Angry Video Game Nerd My understanding was that you wanted to refrain from proper protocol (post warnings, etc...) when you decided to erase the section continuosly despite anything I had to say.
• 16:3416:34, 1 February 2009 diff hist +2,652 Angry Video Game Nerd Keep saying that, does not make it true.

30 January 2009

• 16:2616:26, 30 January 2009 diff hist +2,652 Angry Video Game Nerd Undid revision 267368300 by A Man In Black (talk)
• 08:1308:13, 30 January 2009 diff hist +499 Talk:Angry Video Game Nerd →Examining the sources
• 08:0908:09, 30 January 2009 diff hist +2,652 Angry Video Game Nerd You are running out of excuses for erasing the section. See talk.

29 January 2009

• 04:5004:50, 29 January 2009 diff hist +316 Talk:Angry Video Game Nerd →Examining the sources
• 04:4704:47, 29 January 2009 diff hist +2,652 Angry Video Game Nerd Undid revision 267127453 by A Man In Black (talk)
• 04:4604:46, 29 January 2009 diff hist +39 User:Brad M. No edit summary current
• 04:4504:45, 29 January 2009 diff hist +741 User:Brad M. →Current Situation
• 04:2704:27, 29 January 2009 diff hist +154 User:Brad M. No edit summary
• 04:1704:17, 29 January 2009 diff hist +152 Talk:Angry Video Game Nerd →Examining the sources
• 04:1604:16, 29 January 2009 diff hist +2,652 Angry Video Game Nerd Get the rest of the sources up, then we'll talk.

28 January 2009

• 04:4404:44, 28 January 2009 diff hist +2,652 Angry Video Game Nerd Undid revision 266902723 by A Man In Black (talk)
• 04:2404:24, 28 January 2009 diff hist +2,652 Angry Video Game Nerd No edit summary
• 04:2204:22, 28 January 2009 diff hist +2,652 Angry Video Game Nerd "Dumping on talk?" What does that mean?
• 04:0804:08, 28 January 2009 diff hist +2,652 Angry Video Game Nerd You refusal to even look at the article is disturbing. If you did, you would find the sources and this would be a non-issue.

27 January 2009

• 16:2016:20, 27 January 2009 diff hist +2,652 Angry Video Game Nerd Undid revision 266701051 by A Man In Black (talk)
• 02:3702:37, 27 January 2009 diff hist +428 Talk:Angry Video Game Nerd →Nostalgia Critic section
• 02:2002:20, 27 January 2009 diff hist +2,652 Angry Video Game Nerd Undid revision 266649042 by A Man In Black (talk)

26 January 2009

• 16:1616:16, 26 January 2009 diff hist +574 Talk:Angry Video Game Nerd →Nostalgia Critic section
• 16:0716:07, 26 January 2009 diff hist +547 Talk:Angry Video Game Nerd →Nostalgia Critic section
• 16:0116:01, 26 January 2009 diff hist +2,652 Angry Video Game Nerd Undid revision 266468835 by A Man In Black (talk)
• 04:5704:57, 26 January 2009 diff hist +2,652 Angry Video Game Nerd From our discussion, it is obvious that you are leaving out important facts that show the baselessness of your complaints. Your deletion of an entire section is unwarranted.
• 04:5504:55, 26 January 2009 diff hist −38 Talk:Angry Video Game Nerd →Nostalgia Critic section

25 January 2009

• 23:3723:37, 25 January 2009 diff hist +316 Talk:Angry Video Game Nerd →Nostalgia Critic section
• 23:3423:34, 25 January 2009 diff hist +2,652 Angry Video Game Nerd Undid revision 266267385 by A Man In Black (talk)
• 05:3105:31, 25 January 2009 diff hist −208 Talk:Angry Video Game Nerd →Nostalgia Critic section: Did not mean to post last sentence.
• 05:2905:29, 25 January 2009 diff hist +208 Talk:Angry Video Game Nerd →Nostalgia Critic section
• 05:2705:27, 25 January 2009 diff hist +376 Talk:Angry Video Game Nerd →Nostalgia Critic section

24 January 2009

• 22:0622:06, 24 January 2009 diff hist +2,652 Angry Video Game Nerd Be respectful, there was a long discussion on this subject in the talkback section. Bring up your argument there.
• 04:3604:36, 24 January 2009 diff hist −16 Angry Video Game Nerd Made title of section short and to the point.
• 04:3504:35, 24 January 2009 diff hist +2,668 Angry Video Game Nerd You have absolutely no basis for deleting an entire section of this article.

23 December 2008

• 01:0301:03, 23 December 2008 diff hist +339 Talk:That Guy with the Glasses No edit summary

16 December 2008

• 15:0815:08, 16 December 2008 diff hist −1 Moshe Feiglin →Reaction from Likud members: Changed spelling for Daniel Benlulu, corresponds with Wiki article.