User contributions for Bbanja luka
Results for Bbanja luka talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log
A user with 46 edits. Account created on 11 September 2009.
7 September 2010
- 08:3608:36, 7 September 2010 diff hist +344 Banja Luka →Bosnian War: The previous sentence has been corrected because there has been issued a Higher Court ruling, referenced as above.
7 November 2009
- 10:1610:16, 7 November 2009 diff hist +1,149 Banja Luka You are right, it is not contraversial at all. That source you like so much is pure fabrication&propaganda. Btw, from the ICTY verdict there are several such quotes. Hardly 'out of context'. See BoD.
6 November 2009
- 19:1719:17, 6 November 2009 diff hist +494 Banja Luka Additional clarifications about the war time.
- 17:5917:59, 6 November 2009 diff hist +1,318 Bosnian War This is highly referenced pragraph with direct citations from documents of ICJ, CIA factbook and Deyton Accords. Nirvana70 and proven fabricator Robo-linker consider it is POV.
- 17:5317:53, 6 November 2009 diff hist +923 Bosnian War [Nirvana70] and proven fabricationist [Robot-linker] push together for the same propaganda, bias and lies. The whole aritcle is under constant control of this group.
4 November 2009
- 15:3015:30, 4 November 2009 diff hist +1,689 Bosnian War Restored vandalism and propaganda from proven fabricator [Robo-linker]
- 11:0011:00, 4 November 2009 diff hist +719 Talk:Banja Luka No edit summary
3 November 2009
- 10:1910:19, 3 November 2009 diff hist −284 Talk:Banja Luka No edit summary
- 09:4109:41, 3 November 2009 diff hist +1,349 Talk:Banja Luka No edit summary
2 November 2009
- 19:2319:23, 2 November 2009 diff hist −250 Talk:Banja Luka No edit summary
- 19:1419:14, 2 November 2009 diff hist +356 Talk:Banja Luka No edit summary
31 October 2009
- 15:5315:53, 31 October 2009 diff hist −1 Banja Luka typos
- 15:4915:49, 31 October 2009 diff hist +3,898 Banja Luka PRODY, you did not even read the edit, just pressed undo, as I thought. You are not even trying to present the complete picture. Typical propagandist. FYI twelve babies is a real sad event.
- 10:2910:29, 31 October 2009 diff hist +3,641 Banja Luka Now its better. Referenced text restored, references added and bias removed. Lazy propagandists bon appétit!
- 09:4809:48, 31 October 2009 diff hist +41 Banja Luka At least beware of typos while destroying somebodies work.
30 October 2009
- 19:4619:46, 30 October 2009 diff hist −1,018 Banja Luka This is ancient news. Indications about police/government involvement have proven wrong. Ferhadija is now almost finished with rebuilding and looking like before.
- 19:3919:39, 30 October 2009 diff hist +431 Banja Luka Text Robo is pushing for is heavilly bias, partial and one sided. This version with imputs from 20 and robo could be something we can work with.
- 19:1819:18, 30 October 2009 diff hist +206 Banja Luka War in Yu is the framework. RS if founded on Jan/09-1992 and B&H decalration came later. Banja Luka gradually gained status of the capital from Serbian Sarajevo. Those are easily referenced facts. OK?
- 18:4618:46, 30 October 2009 diff hist +41 Banja Luka Typos / Robo, this behavior of yours resembles one of an elephant in a china shop! Take care not to destroy the article in a battle to enforce your opinions.
- 14:2614:26, 30 October 2009 diff hist +35 Wikipedia:WikiProject Serbia/Members Editor added. Regs from Banja Luka!
29 October 2009
- 12:2812:28, 29 October 2009 diff hist +2,553 Banja Luka Twelve babies - important part of Banja Luka history which left permanent impression on all citizens.
- 10:4710:47, 29 October 2009 diff hist −8 Banja Luka typos
- 10:3710:37, 29 October 2009 diff hist +211 Banja Luka Tweety, that's closer to the truth. Just to add some more facts for better understanding of the situation in Banja Luka.
28 October 2009
- 16:3616:36, 28 October 2009 diff hist +1,250 Banja Luka The paragraph you left is extreemly bias, thus it provides false and incorrect image of the events, which is absolutelly uneccaptable.
- 00:1700:17, 28 October 2009 diff hist +686 Bosnian War Nirva and Robo, of course that you can not find sources for your propaganda, while deleting my edits referenced to ICJ, Dayton Accords, ICTY and CIA - with citations.
27 October 2009
- 23:1823:18, 27 October 2009 diff hist +1,880 Banja Luka Check the Constitution at the time and see for yourself if B&H separation referendum was legal. It was not, as it was in direct opposition to the Articles 1, 2, 3 and 5 of the Constitution.
26 October 2009
- 15:3215:32, 26 October 2009 diff hist +1,880 Banja Luka Add facts.
25 October 2009
- 13:4313:43, 25 October 2009 diff hist +1,880 Banja Luka removed propaganda
- 13:0213:02, 25 October 2009 diff hist +28 Bosnian War Links added.
- 12:5812:58, 25 October 2009 diff hist +252 Bosnian War Refernces added.
- 12:5112:51, 25 October 2009 diff hist +66 Bosnian War Source added.
- 12:4112:41, 25 October 2009 diff hist +473 Bosnian War Sources are official ICJ and ICTY verdicts, and `Bosnian Book of Dead`, already listed.
24 October 2009
- 16:3916:39, 24 October 2009 diff hist +14 Banja Luka No edit summary
- 16:3416:34, 24 October 2009 diff hist +1,866 Banja Luka Propaganda undone.
- 15:5815:58, 24 October 2009 diff hist +473 Bosnian War In ICJ's decision the only caracterization of the nature of the Bosnian war is that it's been "fratricidal war in Bosnia and Herzegovina." (http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/91/13687.pdf)
- 10:1210:12, 24 October 2009 diff hist +471 Bosnian War Additional facts about NATO involvement and operations and victims in the war.
- 00:4300:43, 24 October 2009 diff hist +37 Bosnian War No edit summary
- 00:3400:34, 24 October 2009 diff hist +711 Bosnian War No edit summary
23 October 2009
- 15:3515:35, 23 October 2009 diff hist +1,866 Banja Luka No edit summary
16 October 2009
- 14:5314:53, 16 October 2009 diff hist +13 Democratic People's Alliance No edit summary
- 14:5214:52, 16 October 2009 diff hist +52 Democratic People's Alliance No edit summary
- 14:4714:47, 16 October 2009 diff hist −10 Democratic People's Alliance No edit summary
- 14:3714:37, 16 October 2009 diff hist +307 Banja Luka No edit summary
11 September 2009
- 23:3223:32, 11 September 2009 diff hist +1,472 Banja Luka The monastery in Petricevac is not from 1378, but from much later date. Although t is possible that a Franciscan monastery was somewhere around Banja Luka at the time.
- 14:5114:51, 11 September 2009 diff hist +570 Banja Luka No edit summary
- 14:3114:31, 11 September 2009 diff hist +902 Banja Luka No edit summary
