User contributions for Barwick

This account is currently blocked. (Show block details) The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

21:3321:33, 20 August 2019 diff hist +82‎ m User talk:Spintendo ‎ →‎Oath Keepers: see I told you I fail at Wikipedia, forgot to sign it
21:3321:33, 20 August 2019 diff hist +78‎ User talk:Spintendo ‎ →‎Oath Keepers
05:4505:45, 20 August 2019 diff hist +827‎ Talk:Oath Keepers ‎ Undid revision 911639678 by Deacon Vorbis (talk) Deacon Vorbis, stop with your vandalism. If you don't like the discussion on the TALK PAGE, the way to resovle it is not to just delete what someone else said. You have been warned here and on your talk page. Tag: Undo
05:4405:44, 20 August 2019 diff hist +1,278‎ Talk:Oath Keepers ‎ Deacon Vorbis, stop with your vandalism. If you don't like the discussion on the TALK PAGE, the way to resovle it is not to just delete what someone else said. You have been warned here and on your talk page.
05:4205:42, 20 August 2019 diff hist +294‎ User talk:Deacon Vorbis ‎No edit summary
05:3005:30, 20 August 2019 diff hist +694‎ User talk:Barwick ‎ →‎August 2019
05:0805:08, 20 August 2019 diff hist +1,072‎ User talk:Spintendo ‎ →‎Oath Keepers: new section
04:5504:55, 20 August 2019 diff hist +827‎ Talk:Oath Keepers ‎ →‎Request edit
04:4604:46, 20 August 2019 diff hist +1,278‎ Talk:Oath Keepers ‎ →‎Request edit
02:2102:21, 20 August 2019 diff hist +1,226‎ Talk:Oath Keepers ‎ →‎Request edit
01:5901:59, 20 August 2019 diff hist +1,732‎ Talk:Oath Keepers ‎ →‎Request edit

02:3002:30, 19 August 2019 diff hist +718‎ User talk:Acroterion ‎ →‎Oath Keepers
02:0602:06, 19 August 2019 diff hist +224‎ User talk:C.Fred ‎ →‎Oath Keepers
02:0302:03, 19 August 2019 diff hist −1‎ Talk:Oath Keepers ‎ →‎Request edit
02:0302:03, 19 August 2019 diff hist +1,757‎ Talk:Oath Keepers ‎ →‎Request edit
01:5901:59, 19 August 2019 diff hist +248‎ User talk:C.Fred ‎No edit summary
01:5601:56, 19 August 2019 diff hist +83‎ User talk:Acroterion ‎ →‎Oath Keepers
01:5601:56, 19 August 2019 diff hist +1,437‎ User talk:Acroterion ‎ →‎Oath Keepers: new section
01:4901:49, 19 August 2019 diff hist +34‎ Oath Keepers ‎ Undid revision 911315109 by Acroterion (talk) No, you cannot simply undo the edits I made by hand waving and claiming that it is my responsibility to prove a negative. Name calling by media and opponents (like the discredited SPLC) does not make an organization "anti-Government". The TRUTH here is that Oath Keepers' opponents have claimed they are anti-government. The dispute is whether they are or not, and you cannot show that. Tag: Undo
01:4101:41, 19 August 2019 diff hist +74‎ Talk:Oath Keepers ‎ →‎Request edit
01:4001:40, 19 August 2019 diff hist +197‎ Talk:Oath Keepers ‎ →‎Request edit
01:3901:39, 19 August 2019 diff hist +765‎ Talk:Oath Keepers ‎ →‎Request edit

02:4402:44, 18 August 2019 diff hist +12‎ Talk:Oath Keepers ‎ →‎Request edit
02:4302:43, 18 August 2019 diff hist +696‎ Talk:Oath Keepers ‎ →‎Request edit
02:3502:35, 18 August 2019 diff hist +34‎ m Oath Keepers ‎ Clarified the status of Oath Keepers, as opening the article with the phrase "is an anti-government..." is blatantly biased, unless there is very little to no disagreement on that claim. Also removed the words "they believe" in the phrase "would violate the Constitution" for truthfulness
02:2602:26, 18 August 2019 diff hist −31,459‎ User talk:Barwick ‎ Archiving Tag: Replaced
02:2602:26, 18 August 2019 diff hist +31,458‎ N User talk:Barwick/Archive0 ‎ ←Created page with 'This message is regarding the page Ozone Hole. Please stop removing content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you want t...'

20:5820:58, 19 February 2013 diff hist −455‎ m Patrick Henry College ‎ →‎Religious affirmations: Deleted new scientist reference - it is out of place in the discussion about "religious affiliations" of PHC. Similarly so is the LGBT quote below, but that's *maybe* relevant in a stretch...

16:0816:08, 23 September 2011 diff hist +2,419‎ N Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/23 September 2011/List of topics characterized as pseudoscience ‎ ←Created page with '{{medcabstatus |article={{SUBPAGENAME}} |status=New |date=~~~~~ |requester=~~~ |parties= |mediators= |comment=...'