User contributions for AmishPete
A user with 48 edits. Account created on 14 November 2009.
6 January 2010
- 16:3216:32, 6 January 2010 diff hist +722 User talk:AmishPete →I know, I know
- 16:0516:05, 6 January 2010 diff hist −13 User talk:AmishPete →I know, I know: unblock rationale not appearing in form
- 16:0416:04, 6 January 2010 diff hist +1,600 User talk:AmishPete →I know, I know
- 16:0216:02, 6 January 2010 diff hist +1,538 User talk:AmishPete →I know, I know
5 January 2010
- 00:3600:36, 5 January 2010 diff hist +315 Talk:Julian Robertson →Suggested addition about Robertson lawsuit
- 00:0400:04, 5 January 2010 diff hist +493 Talk:Gary Weiss →Suggested addition about Robertson lawsuit
4 January 2010
- 23:5923:59, 4 January 2010 diff hist +688 Talk:Defamation →Minor case in "see also"
- 20:0720:07, 4 January 2010 diff hist +568 Talk:Defamation →No mention of Japan
- 20:0120:01, 4 January 2010 diff hist −35 Defamation →See also: per CHL: not important enough to be the only defamation case in this section
3 January 2010
- 17:1917:19, 3 January 2010 diff hist +626 Talk:Gary Weiss →Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robertson v. McGraw-Hill Co., Weiss, and Shepard
- 15:1315:13, 3 January 2010 diff hist +288 User talk:Cool Hand Luke/Archive 11 →Robertson v. McGraw-Hill Co., Weiss, and Shepard
31 December 2009
- 14:2414:24, 31 December 2009 diff hist −49 Talk:Robertson v. McGraw-Hill Co. →Discussion of Aftermath section in the aftermath...: toning it down
- 14:2114:21, 31 December 2009 diff hist +157 Talk:Robertson v. McGraw-Hill Co. →Discussion of Aftermath section in the aftermath...: relevant policies
- 14:0914:09, 31 December 2009 diff hist +201 Talk:Robertson v. McGraw-Hill Co. →Discussion of Aftermath section in the aftermath...
- 14:0214:02, 31 December 2009 diff hist −31 Robertson v. McGraw-Hill Co. Sure, right up there with "checkbook journalism," the only lawsuit in the category. If anyone doubts this article was created to act out a personal grudge, this is proof positive
- 13:5613:56, 31 December 2009 diff hist −20 Tiger Management substituting hedge funds article for article on minor lawsuit, created to perpetuate an off-wiki grudge having nothing to do with Tiger Manageme
- 13:4813:48, 31 December 2009 diff hist −44 Julian Robertson →Tiger funds: lawsuit is trivial compared to longterm performance of Tiger funds and achievements of Robertson over the years
30 December 2009
- 23:2823:28, 30 December 2009 diff hist +188 Talk:Robertson v. McGraw-Hill Co. →The true issue here
- 23:2523:25, 30 December 2009 diff hist +442 User talk:AmishPete →Can you disclose your other account?
- 03:5203:52, 30 December 2009 diff hist +736 Talk:Robertson v. McGraw-Hill Co. →The true issue here
29 December 2009
- 23:5123:51, 29 December 2009 diff hist +39 Talk:Robertson v. McGraw-Hill Co. →The true issue here
- 23:1423:14, 29 December 2009 diff hist +566 Talk:Robertson v. McGraw-Hill Co. →The true issue here: conflict of interest disclosure
- 23:0923:09, 29 December 2009 diff hist +734 Talk:Gary Weiss question and COI disclosure
- 23:0223:02, 29 December 2009 diff hist +558 Talk:Robertson v. McGraw-Hill Co. No edit summary
- 22:5422:54, 29 December 2009 diff hist +528 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robertson v. McGraw-Hill Co., Weiss, and Shepard No edit summary
- 22:4522:45, 29 December 2009 diff hist +239 User talk:AmishPete →Welcome and a note about the articles you are editing
16 December 2009
- 15:4915:49, 16 December 2009 diff hist +545 Patrick M. Byrne →Campaign against naked shorting and analysts: replacing trivia ("the check arrived in the mail") with relevant facts on reaction of both parties
9 December 2009
- 14:3314:33, 9 December 2009 diff hist −2 Bed Bath & Beyond (online retailer) correcting serious error: Rocker suit did not involve naked shorting
- 14:2414:24, 9 December 2009 diff hist −7 Bed Bath & Beyond (online retailer) →Board of Directors: Dr. titles only used for medical doctors
- 14:2114:21, 9 December 2009 diff hist +1 Bed Bath & Beyond (online retailer) →Lawsuits: more logical paragraph break
- 14:0814:08, 9 December 2009 diff hist −1 Bed Bath & Beyond (online retailer) →Lawsuits
- 14:0614:06, 9 December 2009 diff hist −303 Bed Bath & Beyond (online retailer) →Naked short selling campaign: irrelevant and antiquated. Short interest has no relationship to naked short selling
- 14:0414:04, 9 December 2009 diff hist +5 Bed Bath & Beyond (online retailer) →Lawsuits
- 14:0314:03, 9 December 2009 diff hist +27 Bed Bath & Beyond (online retailer) →Lawsuits
- 13:5613:56, 9 December 2009 diff hist +200 Bed Bath & Beyond (online retailer) →Lawsuits: more from Byrne statement
- 13:5013:50, 9 December 2009 diff hist +740 Bed Bath & Beyond (online retailer) →Lawsuits: details of suit, from Byrne article
- 13:4713:47, 9 December 2009 diff hist −249 Bed Bath & Beyond (online retailer) →Lawsuits: When the check arrived at Overstock is immaterial, and Reuters is a more reliable source than The Reg on Overstock
2 December 2009
- 16:1616:16, 2 December 2009 diff hist +67 Patrick M. Byrne →Awards and Media attention: distinction
- 16:1416:14, 2 December 2009 diff hist +2 Patrick M. Byrne →Campaign against naked shorting: adding "analysts" because Gradient et al were not accused of naked shorting. This is a major error
- 16:0816:08, 2 December 2009 diff hist +201 Patrick M. Byrne →Campaign against naked shorting: Washington Post advertisement
- 16:0516:05, 2 December 2009 diff hist +343 Patrick M. Byrne →Campaign against naked shorting: Bethany McLean quote
- 16:0216:02, 2 December 2009 diff hist +163 Patrick M. Byrne →Campaign against naked shorting: article given as source is not accurately quoted, particularly concerning statements by Byrne that HIS stock was being destroyed by the miscreants Tag: possible BLP issue or vandalism
15 November 2009
- 00:1400:14, 15 November 2009 diff hist +15 Naked short selling →Coverage in newspapers and magazines
- 00:0500:05, 15 November 2009 diff hist +401 Naked short selling →Coverage in newspapers and magazines: wuz lead item today on finance news site operated by Slate.com
14 November 2009
- 19:3419:34, 14 November 2009 diff hist +338 Naked short selling →Coverage in newspapers and magazines: new University of Oklahoma study
- 19:3019:30, 14 November 2009 diff hist +330 Bear Stearns →Fed bailout and sale to JPMorgan Chase: study
- 19:2719:27, 14 November 2009 diff hist +17 Lehman Brothers →Short selling allegations
- 19:2619:26, 14 November 2009 diff hist +313 Lehman Brothers →Short selling allegations: new study
