User contributions for Albie's relation of misfortune
A user with 37 edits. Account created on 28 March 2024.
25 May 2024
- 14:5514:55, 25 May 2024 diff hist +347 Talk:Wuxing (Chinese philosophy) →Quincunx or pentagram?: Reply current Tag: Reply
- 14:3314:33, 25 May 2024 diff hist +497 Wikipedia:Reference desk/Humanities →Wuxing iconography: new section Tag: New topic
- 12:0212:02, 25 May 2024 diff hist +1,023 Talk:Wuxing (Chinese philosophy) →Quincunx or pentagram?: new section Tag: New topic
23 May 2024
- 20:4920:49, 23 May 2024 diff hist +253 Talk:Laplace transform →Demonstration that the Laplace transform can be expressed in terms of the Fourier transform.: Reply Tag: Reply
- 20:1220:12, 23 May 2024 diff hist +234 Talk:Laplace transform →Demonstration that the Laplace transform can be expressed in terms of the Fourier transform.: Reply Tag: Reply
- 19:0619:06, 23 May 2024 diff hist +404 Talk:Laplace transform →Demonstration that the Laplace transform can be expressed in terms of the Fourier transform.: Reply Tag: Reply
- 18:3818:38, 23 May 2024 diff hist +195 Talk:Laplace transform →Demonstration that the Laplace transform can be expressed in terms of the Fourier transform.: Reply Tag: Reply
- 14:5914:59, 23 May 2024 diff hist +1,112 Talk:Laplace transform →Demonstration that the Laplace transform can be expressed in terms of the Fourier transform.: Reply Tag: Reply
- 14:0314:03, 23 May 2024 diff hist +243 Talk:Laplace transform →Fourier transform: Reply Tag: Reply
- 14:0214:02, 23 May 2024 diff hist +294 Talk:Laplace transform →Demonstration that the Laplace transform can be expressed in terms of the Fourier transform.
- 13:5913:59, 23 May 2024 diff hist +351 Talk:Laplace transform →Demonstration that the Laplace transform can be expressed in terms of the Fourier transform.: Reply Tag: Reply
- 13:5113:51, 23 May 2024 diff hist +319 Talk:Laplace transform →Fourier transform: Reply Tag: Reply
- 13:4013:40, 23 May 2024 diff hist +422 Laplace transform These are two distinct relations. Both of them are correct. Only the one included in the lead has value as a definition of the Laplace transform, while the other is a definition of the Fourier transform in terms of the Laplace transform. If you contest its relevance, please explain why. If it is not relevant enough for the lead, please move it into the relevant section before you remove it completely. I would not necessarily be opposed to this second option given justification. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 04:1904:19, 23 May 2024 diff hist +385 Talk:Laplace transform →Fourier transform: Reply Tag: Reply
- 03:0803:08, 23 May 2024 diff hist +606 Talk:Laplace transform →Fourier transform: Reply Tag: Reply
- 02:5202:52, 23 May 2024 diff hist +69 N User:Albie's relation of misfortune ←Created page with 'Helpless ''chūnibyō'' muttering around the George Square labyrinth.' current
- 02:3402:34, 23 May 2024 diff hist +421 Laplace transform Undid revision 1225217277 by Constant314 (talk) see talk. Tag: Undo
- 02:3002:30, 23 May 2024 diff hist +752 Talk:Laplace transform →Demonstration that the Laplace transform can be expressed in terms of the Fourier transform.: new section Tag: New topic
- 01:4101:41, 23 May 2024 diff hist −1 m Laplace transform [edit summary cut short] Murat Arcak seems like enough of an authority. Tag: Reverted
- 01:3901:39, 23 May 2024 diff hist +457 Laplace transform Re-added note on Fourier transform to lead with citation, mainly to justify the explanatory value of Tag: Reverted
22 May 2024
- 23:5723:57, 22 May 2024 diff hist +1 m Laplace transform →Formal definition: spacing
- 23:5623:56, 22 May 2024 diff hist +7 m Laplace transform →Formal definition: make it clear what the figure is.
- 23:4123:41, 22 May 2024 diff hist +202 User talk:Albie's relation of misfortune →Fourier transform: Reply current Tag: Reply
- 23:3423:34, 22 May 2024 diff hist +18 m Laplace transform prettier.
- 23:3023:30, 22 May 2024 diff hist +246 Laplace transform Xabq's edit summary seems to be mathematically mistaken, but let me know if I'm out of my depth. Yes, the Fourier transform can be defined in terms of the Laplace transform only along the imaginary axis of the s-domain, but in this way, the Laplace can be defined in terms of the Fourier at every point. It belongs in the lead because it's the most efficient way to communicate the jist of the transform if you already know about Fourier, as many readers will. Tag: Manual revert
- 22:3222:32, 22 May 2024 diff hist +12 Fourier transform nicer spacing
- 22:3122:31, 22 May 2024 diff hist +18 Laplace transform nicer spacing Tag: Reverted
- 20:0520:05, 22 May 2024 diff hist +228 Laplace transform Restored note on the Fourier transform, now with the requirment for a suitable ''f'' repeated. ''Suitable'' implies that the function is zero for all negative ''t'', which renders the negative lower bound of the Fourier transform irrelevant. Tag: Reverted
- 16:0016:00, 22 May 2024 diff hist +3 Laplace transform including the parameter t Tag: Reverted
- 15:5515:55, 22 May 2024 diff hist +195 Laplace transform included the relationship to the generally more familiar fourier transform to the lead. Tag: Reverted
5 May 2024
- 15:5715:57, 5 May 2024 diff hist +7 Kernel (integral equation) ←Changed redirect target from Integral transform to Integral transform#kernel current Tag: Redirect target changed
- 15:5615:56, 5 May 2024 diff hist +25 Integral transform →General form
2 May 2024
- 11:0011:00, 2 May 2024 diff hist +9 Laplace transform →Formal definition
- 10:0510:05, 2 May 2024 diff hist +41 Laplace transform →Formal definition
- 10:0310:03, 2 May 2024 diff hist +39 Laplace transform →Formal definition
29 April 2024
- 22:0122:01, 29 April 2024 diff hist +153 Laplace transform →Formal definition: context.
- 20:5320:53, 29 April 2024 diff hist +75 Laplace transform No edit summary Tag: Reverted
