User contributions for Akalanka820
Results for Akalanka820 talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log
A user with 4,010 edits. Account created on 27 August 2021.
14 February 2024
13 September 2023
- 13:3613:36, 13 September 2023 diff hist −1 Ahluwalia (caste) minor Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 13:2613:26, 13 September 2023 diff hist −1,460 Banaut Undid revision 1175209186 by Akalanka820 (talk) self revert, as it uses predatory open access journal Tags: Undo Reverted
- 13:1413:14, 13 September 2023 diff hist +1,460 Banaut →Culture: This part seems to have some reference mention for a village, reinstated it without taking sides. Tags: Reverted use of predatory open access journal Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 12:5512:55, 13 September 2023 diff hist −5,040 Banaut Restored revision 1153343635 by Utcursch (talk): Restoring to last edit by admin here, recent all are WP:RAJ, or KS Singh Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
- 12:3712:37, 13 September 2023 diff hist +125 Talk:Rajput →Fixing of lede and origin: Fixed it, where is the change? Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 12:2912:29, 13 September 2023 diff hist +230 Talk:Rajput →Fixing of lede and origin: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 11:4811:48, 13 September 2023 diff hist +638 Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics →Request for Comment: should lists of members of castes be deprecated and extant such lists deleted: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
14 July 2023
- 08:3908:39, 14 July 2023 diff hist +3,585 Majhauli Raj Restored revision 1132435929 by Arjayay (talk): Restoring the edit, you cannot remove A Yang reference and replace it with some 1887 ref and some darpan site. please take this to talk page. Tags: Twinkle Undo
- 08:2908:29, 14 July 2023 diff hist +2 Chandel (Rajput clan) →History: She uses "it is said", based on ref. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 08:0508:05, 14 July 2023 diff hist +11 Chandel (Rajput clan) →History: The ref uses Chandella dynasty Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 07:5407:54, 14 July 2023 diff hist −16 Chandel (Rajput clan) See context of "they" - here it talks about dynasty rulers in the paragraph not the gond, word "these" used before makes it clear that it talks about dynasty in context of "they". It has been used multiple times in the same paragraph. Sad to see this continuous misquoting. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
6 July 2023
- 05:2605:26, 6 July 2023 diff hist +720 Talk:Rajputisation →Good faith misunderstanding about the term "Rajputisation": Reply editors can't decide meaning of terminology, references decide it. Cultural immitation part is talked by the reference Tag: Reply
- 05:1405:14, 6 July 2023 diff hist +291 Talk:Rajputisation →Good faith misunderstanding about the term "Rajputisation": Reply they discussing off topic Tag: Reply
4 July 2023
- 11:0811:08, 4 July 2023 diff hist −204 Rajputisation Undid revision 1163343120 by Akalanka820 (talk) self revert Tag: Undo
- 10:4210:42, 4 July 2023 diff hist +334 Talk:Rajputisation →Good faith misunderstanding about the term "Rajputisation": Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 10:3710:37, 4 July 2023 diff hist −28 Talk:Rajputisation →Good faith misunderstanding about the term "Rajputisation": added Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 10:2810:28, 4 July 2023 diff hist +798 Talk:Rajputisation →Good faith misunderstanding about the term "Rajputisation": See reference Louis E Fenech on Rajputisation of Sikh. He uses the term change in characteristics. This is vast topic unlike what few would like readers to believe it. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 10:1910:19, 4 July 2023 diff hist +410 Talk:Rajputisation →Good faith misunderstanding about the term "Rajputisation": This is openly ignoring various references that has been shared. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 10:0710:07, 4 July 2023 diff hist +661 Talk:Rajputisation →Good faith misunderstanding about the term "Rajputisation": Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 09:5609:56, 4 July 2023 diff hist +197 Talk:Rajputisation →Slow motion edit warring: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 09:5209:52, 4 July 2023 diff hist +204 Rajputisation Restored revision 1158683896 by Andy02124 (talk): Restoring it to edit before problem started. Luke and Adamantine123 you can't restore it to your own versions. that is not how discussion is done. You got active after 6 months, it has to be before that various editor made edits after it Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
2 July 2023
- 09:0509:05, 2 July 2023 diff hist +1 Rajputisation Spacing, I have clarified on the talk page in two sections wrt references. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 08:5308:53, 2 July 2023 diff hist +38 Talk:Rajputisation →On the subject line: These refs are open case proving "change in cultural way of life". Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 08:4308:43, 2 July 2023 diff hist 0 Rajputisation minor Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 08:3108:31, 2 July 2023 diff hist +15 Talk:Rajputisation →On the subject line: It is clear from such references Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 08:2908:29, 2 July 2023 diff hist +1,186 Talk:Rajputisation →On the subject line: Add reference Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 08:2408:24, 2 July 2023 diff hist +1,615 Talk:Rajputisation →On the subject line: new section previous section comments don't show up Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
- 08:1608:16, 2 July 2023 diff hist +1,325 Talk:Rajputisation →Good faith misunderstanding about the term "Rajputisation": Reply Tag: Reply
- 07:5007:50, 2 July 2023 diff hist −1,446 Rajputisation Restored revision 1162713308 by Akalanka820 (talk): Stop your POV edits which is being contradicted by other references including Rajputisation of Sikhs etc. you can decide lede in your own words which is not bscked by summarised version. and please don't dump long quotes Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
30 June 2023
- 18:3018:30, 30 June 2023 diff hist −1 Rajputisation →Formation: Minor Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 17:5217:52, 30 June 2023 diff hist +263 Talk:Rajputisation →Good faith misunderstanding about the term "Rajputisation": They have L Vishwanath for this, this is where I remember Fowler&fowler old comments which some are unfortunately ignoring continuously. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 17:3917:39, 30 June 2023 diff hist −1,299 Rajputisation Restored revision 1162697222 by Akalanka820 (talk): Admantine123 please stop reverting to Luke Emily on various pages, you have been continuously doing that on many pages. This is very odd. I have explained it on the talk page avoid edit warring Tags: Twinkle Undo
- 17:3617:36, 30 June 2023 diff hist +936 Talk:Rajputisation →Good faith misunderstanding about the term "Rajputisation": It is book on infanticide and even some other communities are covered there, the important thing Shail Mayaram summaries in better words. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 17:2017:20, 30 June 2023 diff hist +2,058 Talk:Rajputisation →Good faith misunderstanding about the term "Rajputisation": Added Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 17:0217:02, 30 June 2023 diff hist +157 Talk:Rajputisation →Good faith misunderstanding about the term "Rajputisation": Added the quotes properly Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 16:5916:59, 30 June 2023 diff hist +15 Talk:Rajputisation →Good faith misunderstanding about the term "Rajputisation": See this on Sikh, and for Ms Reena Dube she also talked about other castes as well. It has been summarised by Shail Mayaram in appropriate words. The forms the lede, not your own words. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 16:5516:55, 30 June 2023 diff hist +1,067 Talk:Rajputisation →Good faith misunderstanding about the term "Rajputisation": It is broad topic including how Sikhs took Singh surname from Rajput as part of the same Rajputisation process. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 16:4716:47, 30 June 2023 diff hist +28 Rajputisation This tag got removed, I have reinstated. Rajputisation of Sikh is on the article itself. This very broad topic not restricted to a single community. It is clear from Shail Mayaram reference summarising the subject. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 16:4216:42, 30 June 2023 diff hist −1,327 Rajputisation Restored revision 1162635283 by Akalanka820 (talk): Don't edit war here, to have your own edits inserted in way or the other Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
- 09:1709:17, 30 June 2023 diff hist +355 Rajput →Early references: Out of all the removal I have seen, this part is WP:DUE, explaining it. The lede also uses the word in first line. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 09:0509:05, 30 June 2023 diff hist −2 Rajputisation →Formation: Minor Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 09:0209:02, 30 June 2023 diff hist −64 Rajputisation →Attempted Rajputisation of Adivasi people: What this topic got to do with it ? This is more of theoretical topic. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 08:5908:59, 30 June 2023 diff hist −10 Rajputisation Appropriate Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 08:5808:58, 30 June 2023 diff hist +63 Rajputisation Out of all the ref, only this summarises to an extent in broader manner Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 08:4808:48, 30 June 2023 diff hist −13 Rajputisation In line with ref, avoiding less direct usage Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 08:3008:30, 30 June 2023 diff hist −39 Rajputisation Changing the short summary in line with how other similar topics like Pashtunisation and other such are Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 08:2708:27, 30 June 2023 diff hist +348 Rajputisation This is a process used by all castes. This is summarising the secondary reference used. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 07:3307:33, 30 June 2023 diff hist 0 Rajput →Origin: What has this got to do with earliest references? If anything it is based on analysis of folklore of a character. Moving it for now Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 07:2107:21, 30 June 2023 diff hist 0 Talk:Rajput →Replacement of redirect (Rajputra) with questionable content: minot Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
