User contributions for Addidy
Results for Addidy talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log
A user with 18 edits. Account created on 8 November 2020.
12 January 2021
- 18:1218:12, 12 January 2021 diff hist +79 Talk:Remote viewing →David Marks Exposed, The original Targ-Puthoff outbounder experiments are legitimate.
- 18:1218:12, 12 January 2021 diff hist +1,417 Talk:Remote viewing →David Marks Exposed, The original Targ-Puthoff outbounder experiments are legitimate.
11 January 2021
- 21:2821:28, 11 January 2021 diff hist −18 Talk:Charles Tart →Tart was innocent on the rejudging cues
- 21:2721:27, 11 January 2021 diff hist +757 Talk:Charles Tart →Tart was innocent on the rejudging cues
- 21:2321:23, 11 January 2021 diff hist +739 Talk:Remote viewing →David Marks Exposed, The original Targ-Puthoff outbounder experiments are legitimate.
10 January 2021
- 10:0610:06, 10 January 2021 diff hist −229 Talk:Remote viewing signed
9 January 2021
- 22:4622:46, 9 January 2021 diff hist −512 Remote viewing Undid revision 999372399 by LuckyLouie (talk) Find one piece of evidence and add it as a cite. just one that isn't randi, that backs this up. then I'll be happy. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 22:2922:29, 9 January 2021 diff hist +625 Charles Tart Undid revision 999373005 by LuckyLouie (talk) this is not a fringe theory. You can look directly at the nature articles and logically come to the same conclusion. Marks has tried the same thing 1981. Tart correctly handled the rejudging procedure. Marks seems to have an agenda Tag: Undo
- 22:2522:25, 9 January 2021 diff hist +831 Talk:Charles Tart →Tart was innocent on the rejudging cues: new section
- 22:0822:08, 9 January 2021 diff hist +1,205 Talk:Remote viewing →David Marks Exposed, The original Targ-Puthoff outbounder experiments are legitimate.: new section
- 21:5921:59, 9 January 2021 diff hist +271 User talk:LuckyLouie →This is not a fringe theory: new section Tag: Reverted
- 19:3319:33, 9 January 2021 diff hist −512 Remote viewing Considering the questionable actions taken by Randi during the Michael Presscott investigation it remains unclear how much misinformation is associated with his claims. I could not find these "other researchers" replicating the investigations. Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- 14:4614:46, 9 January 2021 diff hist +11 m Charles Tart clarification Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- 14:4414:44, 9 January 2021 diff hist +2 m Charles Tart broken date fix Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- 14:3114:31, 9 January 2021 diff hist +612 Charles Tart If you compare "Information transmission under conditions of sensory shielding-Nature v. 251" to "Remote Viewing Exposed-v. 319" you will find that all cues given by Marks refers to the psychics location only. This does allow you to order the transcripts to some degree. However, the order of the target sites were randomized in Tart's rejudging "Information transmission in remote viewing experiments-Nature v. 284". note: the conclusion was that anyone can RV. Try it. save your time. Tags: Reverted Visual edit
2 January 2021
- 11:1411:14, 2 January 2021 diff hist −18,485 User:Addidy/vector.css remove the terrible dark skin current Tag: Blanking
11 November 2020
- 22:3922:39, 11 November 2020 diff hist +18,485 N User:Addidy/vector.css ←Created page with '→CSS placed here will affect users of the Vector skin: →Override Vector colour scheme to make it dark (compiled from modified LESS code): h1,h2,h3,h4,h5...'
- 21:3921:39, 11 November 2020 diff hist −124 m Remote viewing It's a bit odd to compare Remote Viewing to television
