User contributions for 93.97.53.250

2 May 2010

• 13:2713:27, 2 May 2010 diff hist +18‎ List of Hungarians ‎ →‎Writers: added Jenő Rejtő

14 April 2010

• 17:5017:50, 14 April 2010 diff hist +147‎ Talk:Jobbik ‎ →‎Requested move
• 17:4417:44, 14 April 2010 diff hist +620‎ Talk:Jobbik ‎ →‎This Article Is a Mess
• 13:1313:13, 14 April 2010 diff hist +281‎ Talk:Jobbik ‎ →‎Requested move
• 13:1113:11, 14 April 2010 diff hist +363‎ Talk:Jobbik ‎ →‎This Article Is a Mess
• 03:1803:18, 14 April 2010 diff hist +842‎ Talk:Jobbik ‎ →‎Requested move

13 April 2010

• 13:3813:38, 13 April 2010 diff hist −51‎ Talk:Jobbik ‎ →‎Ideology
• 13:3713:37, 13 April 2010 diff hist +823‎ Talk:Jobbik ‎ →‎Ideology
• 12:5712:57, 13 April 2010 diff hist +690‎ Talk:Jobbik ‎ →‎This Article Is a Mess

12 April 2010

• 11:0211:02, 12 April 2010 diff hist +3,316‎ Jobbik ‎ Reverted infobox. Please think very carefully before making changes to a very informative, detailed and well referenced infobox that has stood the test of time. Please see talk.
• 10:5010:50, 12 April 2010 diff hist +393‎ Talk:Jobbik ‎ →‎Political position
• 10:4510:45, 12 April 2010 diff hist +1,669‎ Talk:Jobbik ‎ →‎Ideology
• 07:5307:53, 12 April 2010 diff hist +92‎ Árpád stripes ‎ Added NBH

11 April 2010

• 20:1120:11, 11 April 2010 diff hist +586‎ Talk:Jobbik ‎ →‎telegraph.co.uk article
• 20:0520:05, 11 April 2010 diff hist +2‎ Jobbik ‎ Undid vandalism. User changed classification away from that shown by references.

26 March 2010

• 11:5211:52, 26 March 2010 diff hist +125‎ Jobbik ‎ This is such a key issue I think. (Jobbik for example wanting to give nationality and voting rights to such communities etc.) It's probably wise if you make a compelling case for this on the talk page

21 March 2010

• 23:5423:54, 21 March 2010 diff hist −23‎ Alliance of European National Movements ‎ Nowhere does it say that these parties share third-positionism. Please reference.

17 March 2010

• 22:3122:31, 17 March 2010 diff hist +6‎ Jobbik ‎ Incorrect, despite being and MEP, she retains her post as Associate Professor at the ELTE Faculty of Law. Arguably Hungary's most prestigious law department. Look it up.

9 March 2010

• 19:1519:15, 9 March 2010 diff hist −1‎ Gergely Pongrátz ‎ →‎Politics: The MVSZ is a federation not an association

25 February 2010

• 22:5322:53, 25 February 2010 diff hist +130‎ Jobbik ‎ How is an accurate historical map, a fallacious fact. It is an image from the wikarticle on Trianon.

21 December 2009

• 20:4420:44, 21 December 2009 diff hist +8‎ Jobbik ‎ This is a valuable aid to understand "Radical Nationalism" until a English wiki article is prepared

3 December 2009

• 03:2803:28, 3 December 2009 diff hist +130‎ Talk:Jobbik ‎No edit summary
• 01:2101:21, 3 December 2009 diff hist +16‎ Talk:Jobbik ‎ →‎Political position
• 01:1401:14, 3 December 2009 diff hist +3‎ List of fascist movements by country G–M ‎ Removed "Jobbik" see talk
• 01:1001:10, 3 December 2009 diff hist +3,394‎ Talk:Jobbik ‎ →‎Political position: Why Nationalist?
• 00:0400:04, 3 December 2009 diff hist +282‎ Talk:List of fascist movements by country G–M ‎ Re: Jobbik

21 November 2009

• 03:3203:32, 21 November 2009 diff hist +218‎ Jobbik ‎ Shouldn't a user of such experience know better? That providing an edit summary, particularly when making serious changes (of classification for exanple) is considered only polite?

16 November 2009

• 13:3813:38, 16 November 2009 diff hist −14‎ Alliance of European National Movements ‎ Please be kind enough to continue the discussion on the talk page, before reintroducing it: there appears to be no valid reason for this but your POV.

14 November 2009

• 09:5809:58, 14 November 2009 diff hist +985‎ Talk:Alliance of European National Movements ‎No edit summary
• 09:4809:48, 14 November 2009 diff hist −14‎ Alliance of European National Movements ‎ Agreed. What other informative information (allowing people to be acquainted with what this group believes) would you care to submit in its place?

12 November 2009

• 23:1223:12, 12 November 2009 diff hist +18‎ Jobbik ‎ These are simply the facts, why are efforts being made to erase them?

14 August 2009

• 12:3112:31, 14 August 2009 diff hist −1‎ Jobbik ‎ superfluous comma
• 12:0112:01, 14 August 2009 diff hist −217‎ Far-right politics ‎ Such allegations should not be given as fact in the absence of citation!
• 11:5811:58, 14 August 2009 diff hist −63‎ Jobbik ‎ These classifications are uncited, actively denied; and used only by the party's political opponents. They therefore do not belong in such a supposedly "factual" listing.