User contributions for 92.29.224.226

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

23:4123:41, 1 December 2023 diff hist +815‎ Talk:Mark Felton ‎ →‎Request edit on 1 December 2023: new section
14:3314:33, 1 December 2023 diff hist +345‎ Mark Felton ‎ My addition clearly explains what happened to the Tiger tank in question and why a 1:1 scale plastic model currently is on display. It is correctly sourced from the Panzer Museum's own "open letter" and should be retained to provide balance. Tag: Reverted
08:0108:01, 1 December 2023 diff hist +356‎ Mark Felton ‎ I have added a line clarifying that the Panzer Museum did replace the Tiger tank with a 1:1 scale plastic model, as their "open letter" clearly states. Source cited. Tag: Reverted
07:1807:18, 1 December 2023 diff hist +1,343‎ Talk:Mark Felton ‎ →‎Request edit on 1 December 2023: new section

16:4816:48, 30 November 2023 diff hist −1,005‎ Mark Felton ‎ As the video no longer exists, and this paragraph only cites one source (the Panzer Museum) no fair comparison can be made between what the video said and what the Panzer Museum alleges. In the interests of fairness and transparency, this paragraph should be deleted, as the 'open letter' from the Panzer Museum is the only source provided, and that institution is treated as the only viable and 'correct' point-of-view. The paragraph displays bias.
08:3708:37, 30 November 2023 diff hist −17‎ Mark Felton ‎ →‎Criticism: Unnecessary and judgmental sub-heading. Not found on other Wikipedia biographies concerning controversies of considerably greater magnitude.

19:4219:42, 28 November 2023 diff hist −6,115‎ Mark Felton ‎ This entire section needs to be deleted as it is based on Youtube videos, or quotes taken from sources used within a YouTube video. It is not compatible with Wikipedia's own rules concerning sources, and Wikipedia is effectively hosting a critique of my work by an anonymous person who has previously made incorrect statements such as my video not containing any sources. Tags: Manual revert Reverted

22:2522:25, 26 November 2023 diff hist −6,115‎ Mark Felton ‎ →‎Criticism: Youtube videos are not valid Wikipedia article sources. All sources listed originally in the Youtube video. Wikipedia is also not a forum for the public debate of individual Youtube videos. The editor posting this over and over again is acting in a malicious manner, even though warned by other editors that his use of a Youtube video as the primary source is not valid. Tags: Manual revert Reverted
20:2420:24, 26 November 2023 diff hist −6,115‎ Mark Felton ‎ →‎Criticism: Youtube videos are noted by other editors in the 'talk' section as not being viable sources for Wikipedia articles. The person repeatedly posting using a Youtube video as his only source is vandalising this page and breaking Youtube's rules. Tags: Manual revert Reverted

16:5616:56, 23 November 2023 diff hist −605‎ Mark Felton ‎ I have deleted this paragraph for two reasons, raised by other editors on the talk page. Firstly, the video in question has sources clearly listed in the description, making false the paragraph's accusation. Secondly, Youtube videos, as noted repeatedly by other editors in the talk comments, are not acceptable sources for Wikipedia pages.