User contributions for 91.125.59.216

24 August 2017

• 08:5908:59, 24 August 2017 diff hist +4‎ Dave Brailsford ‎ →‎Career Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 08:5808:58, 24 August 2017 diff hist +4‎ Dave Brailsford ‎ →‎Career Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

16 March 2014

• 11:0711:07, 16 March 2014 diff hist −15‎ Intel MCS-48 ‎ →‎Variants: As per talk page, "OTP EPROM" is surely just "PROM"... especially if programmed at the factory. Also, are we seriously using fixed-width mode and spaces to format the columns?!
• 11:0511:05, 16 March 2014 diff hist +585‎ Talk:Intel MCS-48 ‎ →‎"OTP EPROM"?: new section
• 11:0011:00, 16 March 2014 diff hist +99‎ Intel MCS-96 ‎ →‎809x/839x/879x family: this section seems badly translated from some other language. I presume it's meant to be "5x high speed (1020 kbit/s) full duplex serial ports"?

15 March 2014

• 23:5023:50, 15 March 2014 diff hist +550‎ File talk:The Secret of Monkey Island Special Edition SCUMM Bar.jpg ‎ →‎Can we not have this in high resolution?: new section current
• 12:2512:25, 15 March 2014 diff hist +242‎ Talk:Valley Heights train collision ‎ →‎Wrong side failure?: new section

14 March 2014

• 19:1419:14, 14 March 2014 diff hist 0‎ Battle of the Beams ‎ →‎X-Gerät: Late 1940 to mid-late 1943 is quiiiiiite a long time when you take it in context of the whole of WW2 - and indeed how quickly the Luftwaffe developed the technique in the first place.
• 18:4618:46, 14 March 2014 diff hist +11‎ VHF omnidirectional range ‎ →‎Operation: er... WHAT accompanying illustration?

12 March 2014

• 23:1423:14, 12 March 2014 diff hist +6‎ Headlamp (outdoor) ‎ →‎Description: Are you at all serious? Please explain the reasoning behind this one. Just because an incandescent bulb demands more current doesn't mean it's brighter; power consumption by itself isnt a benefit. And LEDs can't be tightly focussed?! Eh?

11 March 2014

• 22:3622:36, 11 March 2014 diff hist +143‎ Talk:Wealden Line ‎ →‎That map in the "History" section...
• 22:3322:33, 11 March 2014 diff hist −2‎ User talk:91.125.59.216 ‎No edit summary
• 22:3322:33, 11 March 2014 diff hist +13‎ User talk:91.125.59.216 ‎No edit summary
• 22:3322:33, 11 March 2014 diff hist +186‎ User talk:91.125.59.216 ‎No edit summary
• 22:3222:32, 11 March 2014 diff hist +1,178‎ Talk:Wealden Line ‎ →‎That map in the "History" section...: new section
• 22:2722:27, 11 March 2014 diff hist +163‎ Talk:Wealden Line ‎ →‎Map
• 22:2522:25, 11 March 2014 diff hist +293‎ Talk:Wealden Line ‎ →‎Map
• 22:2322:23, 11 March 2014 diff hist +1,294‎ Talk:Wealden Line ‎ →‎Map

9 March 2014

• 01:0601:06, 9 March 2014 diff hist −6‎ Side platform ‎ no article by that name, and WP unhelpfully redirects to the main Railroad Switch article instead of the one small section halfway through that actually deals with that *type* of switch.
• 00:4000:40, 9 March 2014 diff hist +191‎ Railroad switch ‎ →‎Switch diamond: written in a very colloquial and nonencyclopaedic style, as well as being slightly difficult for the uninitiated to understand. I hope I've tidied it sufficiently to fix both of those issues.
• 00:2700:27, 9 March 2014 diff hist +374‎ Railroad switch ‎ →‎Run-off points: tidying and clarifying
• 00:1900:19, 9 March 2014 diff hist +999‎ Talk:1977 Chicago Loop derailment ‎ →‎Here's a question that neither the article nor the source seem to answer...
• 00:1400:14, 9 March 2014 diff hist +1‎ 1977 Chicago Loop derailment ‎ →‎Collision: In the initial moments, the distinction between the front four and rear four cars wouldn't have been as plain as it was after the accident played out. They just happened to be the ones that fell.
• 00:1100:11, 9 March 2014 diff hist +6‎ 1977 Chicago Loop derailment ‎ →‎Collision: Some strange writing there. I doubt the motorman left by himself, for a start. Also, with the previous confusion over where the crash happened, why not mention the "a station" by name? (Initial edits then mandated domino-style cleanup...)

8 March 2014

• 23:5423:54, 8 March 2014 diff hist +4‎ 1977 Chicago Loop derailment ‎ →‎Infrastructure layout: The "problems" were just a matter of too many trains wanting to use the same rails all at once, and stacking up. There was nothing to "avoid", unless you count "ALL of the trains colliding together" as a "problem".
• 23:5023:50, 8 March 2014 diff hist −35‎ Talk:1977 Chicago Loop derailment ‎ →‎Here's a question that neither the article nor the source seem to answer...: buhhh i should go to bed
• 23:5023:50, 8 March 2014 diff hist +35‎ Talk:1977 Chicago Loop derailment ‎ →‎Here's a question that neither the article nor the source seem to answer...
• 23:4923:49, 8 March 2014 diff hist +1,037‎ Talk:1977 Chicago Loop derailment ‎ →‎Here's a question that neither the article nor the source seem to answer...: new section
• 22:2222:22, 8 March 2014 diff hist +400‎ User talk:East718 ‎ →‎Your deletion of the Jolly Roger's Cookbook article, some time in 2007...
• 22:1922:19, 8 March 2014 diff hist +337‎ User talk:East718 ‎ →‎Your deletion of the Jolly Roger's Cookbook article, some time in 2007...
• 22:1722:17, 8 March 2014 diff hist +1,539‎ User talk:East718 ‎ →‎Your deletion of the Jolly Roger's Cookbook article, some time in 2007...
• 22:1022:10, 8 March 2014 diff hist +222‎ User talk:East718 ‎ →‎Your deletion of the Jolly Roger's Cookbook article, some time in 2007...
• 22:0722:07, 8 March 2014 diff hist +2‎ User talk:East718 ‎ →‎Your deletion of the Jolly Roger's Cookbook article, some time in 2007...
• 22:0722:07, 8 March 2014 diff hist +244‎ User talk:East718 ‎ →‎Your deletion of the Jolly Roger's Cookbook article, some time in 2007...
• 22:0522:05, 8 March 2014 diff hist +1,551‎ User talk:East718 ‎ →‎Your deletion of the Jolly Roger's Cookbook article, some time in 2007...

3 March 2014

• 02:5102:51, 3 March 2014 diff hist 0‎ Lincolnshire Poacher (numbers station) ‎ "air" for radio broadcasts. "line" for wired signals. admittedly, wifi and 3G plus the colloquial use of "online" for anything to do with the internet have muddied the waters somewhat here, but that's still the correct terminology.