User contributions for 86.157.251.230
For 86.157.251.230 talk block log logs filter log
22 May 2008
- 21:0621:06, 22 May 2008 diff hist +337 User talk:PeeJay →wembley blud
- 20:5920:59, 22 May 2008 diff hist +318 User talk:PeeJay →wembley blud: new section
- 20:5620:56, 22 May 2008 diff hist −27,522 User talk:PeeJay it was a new topic just leave it, yeah?
- 11:3911:39, 22 May 2008 diff hist −34,020 User talk:PeeJay that's better
- 11:3611:36, 22 May 2008 diff hist +61 User talk:KyleRGiggs →no i wasn't: new section
- 11:3311:33, 22 May 2008 diff hist +277 Wembley Stadium No edit summary
- 11:2611:26, 22 May 2008 diff hist +155 User talk:PeeJay →ok
- 11:1111:11, 22 May 2008 diff hist +351 User talk:PeeJay →ok: new section
- 10:5810:58, 22 May 2008 diff hist +413 User talk:PeeJay →?: new section
- 10:5110:51, 22 May 2008 diff hist +406 User talk:PeeJay →how is that list reliable?: new section
- 10:4610:46, 22 May 2008 diff hist +118 User talk:PeeJay →stadium ratings: new section
- 10:4410:44, 22 May 2008 diff hist +223 User talk:PeeJay →wembley is 5 star: new section
- 10:4010:40, 22 May 2008 diff hist +277 Wembley Stadium wembley IS a five star stadium, becuase it is still a candidate for the champ league final
21 May 2008
- 21:5621:56, 21 May 2008 diff hist +30 User talk:Epbr123 →shut up: new section
- 21:4821:48, 21 May 2008 diff hist +12 UEFA Champions League →European Cup and Champions League finals
- 21:4721:47, 21 May 2008 diff hist +98 User talk:Rodw →use the discussion pages: new section
- 20:2620:26, 21 May 2008 diff hist −3,392 Yugoslavia national football team this is a stupid page, why does it say last played in 1992, they played in the 2002 world fucking cup
- 17:4117:41, 21 May 2008 diff hist +145 Talk:Soviet Armed Forces →why are there two of the same articels?: new section
- 17:3917:39, 21 May 2008 diff hist +198 User talk:Rodw →solsbury hill: new section
20 May 2008
- 12:3612:36, 20 May 2008 diff hist +130 N File talk:Nuclear weapons states.svg ←Created page with 'what's that country in south america? part of france or something? is it necessary to have it coloured in? a little confusing, no?'
- 11:2111:21, 20 May 2008 diff hist +182 Talk:Solsbury Hill →references/citations: new section
- 11:2011:20, 20 May 2008 diff hist −127 Solsbury Hill →Wildlife: the image of the sign isn't needed because it's context has already been written into the page, in the history section
- 11:1911:19, 20 May 2008 diff hist −48 Solsbury Hill →Wildlife
- 11:1811:18, 20 May 2008 diff hist −48 Solsbury Hill →History and Archaeology
- 11:1711:17, 20 May 2008 diff hist −24 Solsbury Hill →History and Archaeology: the citation is in the sign
- 11:1411:14, 20 May 2008 diff hist −14 New Forest →New Forest National Park: it isnt for comparison, you could have any county over it and it would be for comparison