User contributions for 86.135.237.210

17 March 2015

• 10:1710:17, 17 March 2015 diff hist +40‎ Jonathan King ‎ same guardian article states correct convictions, we cant cherry pick
• 10:1010:10, 17 March 2015 diff hist −434‎ Chris Langham ‎ no it doesnt!!!! Plus thats what he says, not the court?
• 10:0310:03, 17 March 2015 diff hist +14‎ Chris Langham ‎ corrected
• 10:0210:02, 17 March 2015 diff hist −434‎ Chris Langham ‎ ref does not make that claim at all? Need new ref if you want that statement in the article
• 09:5809:58, 17 March 2015 diff hist +15‎ Jonathan King ‎ reads better, no other source than the subject himself
• 09:5009:50, 17 March 2015 diff hist +200‎ Talk:Teddy Sinclair ‎ →‎Too much fluff
• 09:4409:44, 17 March 2015 diff hist +229‎ Talk:Teddy Sinclair ‎ →‎Too much fluff

16 March 2015

• 19:3519:35, 16 March 2015 diff hist −67‎ Jonathan King ‎No edit summary
• 19:3019:30, 16 March 2015 diff hist −72‎ Jonathan King ‎ rescued refs
• 19:2719:27, 16 March 2015 diff hist +15‎ Jonathan King ‎ →‎2000–2010
• 19:2619:26, 16 March 2015 diff hist +29‎ Jonathan King ‎ why was that removed, very strange??
• 19:2219:22, 16 March 2015 diff hist +12‎ Jonathan King ‎ reads better, nothing removed
• 19:1819:18, 16 March 2015 diff hist −209‎ Jonathan King ‎ what relevance is another act doing a cover of a song he covered!! Nothing to do with him
• 19:1619:16, 16 March 2015 diff hist +15‎ Jonathan King ‎ better
• 19:1319:13, 16 March 2015 diff hist +404‎ Talk:Jonathan King ‎ →‎there were 4, why cant I put 4?: new section
• 14:3114:31, 16 March 2015 diff hist −558‎ Jonathan King ‎ look at talk for source please
• 14:3114:31, 16 March 2015 diff hist −38‎ Jonathan King ‎ every convict says they are innocent, doesnt mean you put it in the lead!
• 14:2914:29, 16 March 2015 diff hist +128‎ Talk:Jonathan King ‎ →‎some points
• 14:2814:28, 16 March 2015 diff hist +284‎ Talk:Jonathan King ‎ →‎produced the brits once only: new section
• 14:2514:25, 16 March 2015 diff hist −555‎ Jonathan King ‎ please prove that he produced the brits, because the brit site itself doesnt mention it??
• 14:2314:23, 16 March 2015 diff hist −3‎ Jonathan King ‎ there were only 4, so state that there were only 4?
• 09:5609:56, 16 March 2015 diff hist −7‎ Jonathan King ‎ better
• 09:5509:55, 16 March 2015 diff hist −18‎ Jonathan King ‎ correct conviction
• 09:4809:48, 16 March 2015 diff hist +249‎ Talk:Jonathan King ‎ →‎some points: new section
• 09:4609:46, 16 March 2015 diff hist +23‎ Jonathan King ‎ better
• 09:4309:43, 16 March 2015 diff hist −429‎ Jonathan King ‎ subjects own book is not a reliable source, and not relevant either
• 09:4209:42, 16 March 2015 diff hist −136‎ Jonathan King ‎ ref listed does not say he produced brits, and even says he left completely in 1991? Please put new source before adding
• 09:3809:38, 16 March 2015 diff hist −164‎ Talk:Teddy Sinclair ‎ →‎edit request please - this just looks silly
• 09:3509:35, 16 March 2015 diff hist +686‎ Talk:Teddy Sinclair ‎ →‎edit request please - this just looks silly: new section
• 09:3509:35, 16 March 2015 diff hist −54‎ Talk:Teddy Sinclair ‎ →‎is an English singer, actress, record producer, fashion designer, and director - REALLY!!!
• 09:3409:34, 16 March 2015 diff hist +218‎ Talk:Teddy Sinclair ‎ →‎is an English singer, actress, record producer, fashion designer, and director - REALLY!!!
• 09:3209:32, 16 March 2015 diff hist −4‎ Talk:Teddy Sinclair ‎ →‎is an English singer, actress, record producer, fashion designer, and director - REALLY!!!
• 09:2909:29, 16 March 2015 diff hist +239‎ Talk:Teddy Sinclair ‎ →‎is an English singer, actress, record producer, fashion designer, and director - REALLY!!!: new section

22 December 2012

• 15:3015:30, 22 December 2012 diff hist +8‎ Paulie ‎ →‎Plot