User contributions for 82.171.192.178

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

22:0722:07, 7 June 2015 diff hist +26‎ June 2015 Turkish general election ‎ →‎Contesting parties: HDP is the de facto successor of the parliamentary faction consisting out of Kurdish MP's who entered as independant candidates (without a party)

02:4002:40, 1 June 2015 diff hist −8‎ Gaza flotilla raid ‎ →‎Domestic reactions: Removed a biased adjective Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

16:3416:34, 2 February 2015 diff hist −306‎ Ahl al-Bayt ‎ →‎In the Qur'an: There is no reference presented at all in the first place for this fact.
16:3016:30, 2 February 2015 diff hist −699‎ Ridda Wars ‎ →‎Najd: again there is no evidence in the references for this big claim. If this was true, Umar would not appoint Khalid as the general of the muslim armies and rather kill him as the claim was here which no proof is of in the references.
16:2516:25, 2 February 2015 diff hist −13‎ Saladin ‎ There are in the summarised references no evidences that he was a ashari, only that he was a sunni muslim.

21:4921:49, 28 January 2015 diff hist −5‎ Muhammad ibn Abi Bakr ‎ no proof for this claim
21:4321:43, 28 January 2015 diff hist −1,639‎ Ridda Wars ‎ →‎Najd: Their is no proof or evidence from the so-called ''referention". Rather i assume that the one who wrote it was a shiite. Shiites hate Umar ibn Al-Khattab & Khalid ibn Waleed, thus trying to spread such ideas by way of "taqiyya'' (shiite princ.)
21:4021:40, 28 January 2015 diff hist −1,639‎ Ridda Wars ‎ →‎Najd: Their is no proof or evidence from the so-called ''referention

21:4121:41, 19 May 2014 diff hist −2,891‎ Christ myth theory ‎ Deleted a paragraph which blatantly stated that all scholars agree Jesus existed (which would not really fit in the Christ-myth). Let readers read the whole article and make up their own mind.
21:0621:06, 19 May 2014 diff hist −827‎ User talk:82.171.192.178 ‎ ←Blanked the page
21:0321:03, 19 May 2014 diff hist +2‎ Talk:Historicity of Jesus ‎ →‎Proposal: delete all religous-inspired sources
21:0221:02, 19 May 2014 diff hist +1,527‎ Talk:Historicity of Jesus ‎ →‎Proposal: delete all religous-inspired sources

15:0815:08, 18 May 2014 diff hist +873‎ Talk:Historicity of Jesus ‎ →‎Proposal: delete all religous-inspired sources: new section
14:5714:57, 18 May 2014 diff hist −68‎ Historicity of Jesus ‎ →‎Existence: Stating the obvious. Only Biblical scholars are cited. Non of which would qualify as a scholar of antiquity. Also cleared up some biased interpretation of Greco-Roman sources. Non of which are contemporary to so-called Jesus of Nazareth

17:3217:32, 28 March 2014 diff hist −28‎ Herbert Jones (jockey) ‎ him being 'haunted' is folkore

23:4623:46, 27 March 2014 diff hist −145‎ Mikoyan MiG-29 ‎ →‎Syria: That is not what the source says at all.

14:2414:24, 24 February 2014 diff hist +28‎ Kurdistan Workers' Party ‎ →‎International support
14:2014:20, 24 February 2014 diff hist −1,794‎ Kurdistan Workers' Party ‎ →‎Tactics: Source is the same nationalistic newspaper mentioned earlier. Such strong claims should come from independant sources.
14:1614:16, 24 February 2014 diff hist −415‎ Kurdistan Workers' Party ‎ →‎History: Source is a nationalistic Turkish newspaper. such allegations should come from more viable sources.