User contributions for 79.67.113.83

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

11:1911:19, 29 August 2022 diff hist +141‎ Talk:Disappearance of Don Banfield ‎ →‎The information given in this is not only one sided and only gives the prosecution case the judge erred in allowing the case to proceed.there are lots of joint venture cases, this was unusual due to the lack of evidence.the judge subsequently admitted that he should not have allowed it to proceed.They have also gotton many basic details wrong, and have relied on sensational tabloid reporting and solely cherry picking bits of the prosecution case Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
11:1711:17, 29 August 2022 diff hist −1‎ Talk:Disappearance of Don Banfield ‎ →‎The information given in this is not only one sided and only gives the prosecution case the judge erred in allowing the case to proceed.there are lots of joint venture cases, this was unusual due to the lack of evidence.the judge subsequently admitted that he should not have allowed it to proceed.They have also gotton many basic details wrong, and have relied on sensational tabloid reporting and solely cherry picking bits of the prosecution case Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
11:1611:16, 29 August 2022 diff hist +446‎ Talk:Disappearance of Don Banfield ‎ →‎The information given in this is not only one sided and only gives the prosecution case the judge erred in allowing the case to proceed.there are lots of joint venture cases, this was unusual due to the lack of evidence.the judge subsequently admitted that he should not have allowed it to proceed.They have also gotton many basic details wrong, and have relied on sensational tabloid reporting and solely cherry picking bits of the prosecution case Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
11:0511:05, 29 August 2022 diff hist −3‎ Talk:Disappearance of Don Banfield ‎ →‎The information given in this is not only one sided and only gives the prosecution case the judge erred in allowing the case to proceed.there are lots of joint venture cases, this was unusual due to the lack of evidence.the judge subsequently admitted that he should not have allowed it to proceed.They have also gotton many basic details wrong, and have relied on sensational tabloid reporting and solely cherry picking bits of the prosecution case Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
10:3910:39, 29 August 2022 diff hist +89‎ Talk:Disappearance of Don Banfield ‎ →‎The information given in this is not only one sided and only gives the prosecution case the judge erred in allowing the case to proceed.there are lots of joint venture cases, it this was unusual due to the lack of evidence.the judge subsequently admitted that he should not have allowed it to proceed.They have also gotton many basic details wrong, and have relied on sensational tabloid reporting and solely cherry picking bits of the prosecution case Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
10:2510:25, 29 August 2022 diff hist +680‎ Talk:Disappearance of Don Banfield ‎ →‎The information given in this is not only one sided and only gives the prosecution case the judge erred in allowing the case to proceed.there are lots of joint venture cases, it this was unusual due to the lack of evidence.the judge subsequently admitted that he should not have allowed it to proceed.They have also gotton many basic details wrong, and have relied on sensational tabloid reporting and solely cherry picking bits of the prosecution case Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
10:0610:06, 29 August 2022 diff hist −39‎ Disappearance of Don Banfield ‎ (edit summary removed) Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
10:0410:04, 29 August 2022 diff hist +109‎ Talk:Disappearance of Don Banfield ‎ →‎The information given in this is not only one sided and only gives the prosecution case the judge erred in allowing the case to proceed.there are lots of joint venture cases, it this was unusual due to the lack of evidence.the judge subsequently admitted that he should not have allowed it to proceed.They have also gotton many basic details wrong, and have relied on sensational tabloid reporting and solely cherry picking bits of the prosecution case Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
09:5909:59, 29 August 2022 diff hist 0‎ Talk:Disappearance of Don Banfield ‎ →‎The information given in this is not only one sided and only gives the prosecution case the judge erred in allowing the case to proceed.there are lots of joint venture cases, it this was unusual due to the lack of evidence.the judge subsequently admitted that he should not have allowed it to proceed.They have also gotton many basic details wrong, and have relied on sensational tabloid reporting and solely cherry picking bits of the prosecution case Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
09:5809:58, 29 August 2022 diff hist +3,469‎ Talk:Disappearance of Don Banfield ‎ →‎The information given in this is not only one sided and only gives the prosecution case the judge erred in allowing the case to proceed.there are lots of joint venture cases, it this was unusual due to the lack of evidence.the judge subsequently admitted that he should not have allowed it to proceed.They have also bottom many basic details wrong, and have relied on sensational tabloid reporting and solely cherry picking bits of the prosecution case: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
09:1509:15, 29 August 2022 diff hist +426‎ Disappearance of Don Banfield ‎ (edit summary removed) Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

21:1921:19, 28 August 2022 diff hist +132‎ Disappearance of Don Banfield ‎ (edit summary removed) Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
21:1421:14, 28 August 2022 diff hist +65‎ Disappearance of Don Banfield ‎ (edit summary removed) Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
21:1121:11, 28 August 2022 diff hist −391‎ Talk:Disappearance of Don Banfield ‎ Fixed mistakes Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
20:5920:59, 28 August 2022 diff hist −1,086‎ Talk:Disappearance of Don Banfield ‎No edit summary Tags: Manual revert Mobile edit Mobile web edit
20:5520:55, 28 August 2022 diff hist +1,086‎ Talk:Disappearance of Don Banfield ‎ →‎Inaccurate information about this case.we will sue you personally.not the sources cited.basic facts my father's name NEVER was and never has been Donald.he is not known by Don it is on his birth certificate and you have his date of birth wrong.and SO much more.I'm contacting my solicitors: new section Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
20:3320:33, 28 August 2022 diff hist +231‎ Disappearance of Don Banfield ‎ (edit summary removed) Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

29 August 2022

28 August 2022