User contributions for 79.6.146.208

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

06:2506:25, 6 October 2011 diff hist +16‎ Talk:Energy Catalyzer ‎ →‎Lead section: where are the "other sources" which "published less favourable reports"?
06:2406:24, 6 October 2011 diff hist +504‎ Talk:Energy Catalyzer ‎ →‎Lead section: where are the "other sources" which "published less favourable reports"?
06:1406:14, 6 October 2011 diff hist +10‎ Talk:Energy Catalyzer ‎ →‎Lead section: Ny Teknik remains both "rational sceptic" and very positive on the E-Cat
06:1006:10, 6 October 2011 diff hist 0‎ Talk:Energy Catalyzer ‎ →‎Lead section: Ny Teknik remains both "rational sceptic" and very positive on the E-Cat
04:5904:59, 6 October 2011 diff hist 0‎ Talk:Energy Catalyzer ‎ →‎Lead section: Ny Teknik remains both "rational sceptic" and very positive on the E-Cat
04:5704:57, 6 October 2011 diff hist +2‎ Talk:Energy Catalyzer ‎ →‎Lead section: Ny Teknik remains both "rational sceptic" and very positive on the E-Cat
04:5504:55, 6 October 2011 diff hist +431‎ Talk:Energy Catalyzer ‎ →‎Lead section: Ny Teknik remains both "rational sceptic" and very positive on the E-Cat
03:5203:52, 6 October 2011 diff hist +1‎ Talk:Energy Catalyzer ‎ →‎Lead section: where are the "other sources" which "published less favourable reports"?
03:5203:52, 6 October 2011 diff hist −4‎ Talk:Energy Catalyzer ‎ →‎Lead section: where are the "other sources" which "published less favourable reports"?
03:4203:42, 6 October 2011 diff hist +8‎ Talk:Energy Catalyzer ‎ →‎Lead section: where are the "other sources" which "published less favourable reports"?
03:4103:41, 6 October 2011 diff hist −27‎ Talk:Energy Catalyzer ‎ →‎Lead section: apart from New Energy Times, where are the other sources which "published less favourable reports"?
03:4103:41, 6 October 2011 diff hist +615‎ Talk:Energy Catalyzer ‎ →‎Lead section: Ny Teknik remains both "rational sceptic" and very positive on the E-Cat
03:3503:35, 6 October 2011 diff hist +15‎ Talk:Energy Catalyzer ‎ →‎Lead section: Ny Teknik remains both "rational sceptic" and very positive on the E-Cat
03:3403:34, 6 October 2011 diff hist +301‎ Talk:Energy Catalyzer ‎ →‎Lead section: New Energy Times lacks enough credibility
03:2803:28, 6 October 2011 diff hist +4‎ Talk:Energy Catalyzer ‎ →‎Lead section: New Energy Times lacks enough credibility
03:2603:26, 6 October 2011 diff hist +75‎ Talk:Energy Catalyzer ‎ →‎Lead section: New Energy Times lacks enough credibility
03:2203:22, 6 October 2011 diff hist +11‎ Talk:Energy Catalyzer ‎ →‎Lead section: New Energy Times lacks enough credibility
03:2103:21, 6 October 2011 diff hist +550‎ Talk:Energy Catalyzer ‎ →‎Lead section: New Energy Times lacks enough credibility
03:1403:14, 6 October 2011 diff hist +7‎ Talk:Energy Catalyzer ‎ →‎Lead section: New Energy Times lacks credibility
03:0103:01, 6 October 2011 diff hist +2‎ Talk:Energy Catalyzer ‎ →‎Lead section: New Energy Times lacks credibility
03:0103:01, 6 October 2011 diff hist +698‎ Talk:Energy Catalyzer ‎ →‎Lead section
02:4502:45, 6 October 2011 diff hist −30‎ Energy Catalyzer ‎ The only "other source" I have found so far is Physorg: http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-08-controversial-energy-generating-lacking-credibility-video.html however Physorg stated that its claims are from New Energy Times, so it is an information loop
02:4102:41, 6 October 2011 diff hist −136‎ Energy Catalyzer ‎ Ny Teknik remains both "rational sceptic" and very positive on the E-Cat. POST SCRIPTUM: Ny Teknik is going to release a new article about the test of 6 October 2011

6 October 2011