User contributions for 76.164.84.194

12 July 2023

• 21:2821:28, 12 July 2023 diff hist +48‎ Talk:Operation Jupiter (1944) ‎ →‎German victory…is there even an argument against this? Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 21:2321:23, 12 July 2023 diff hist +104‎ Talk:Operation Jupiter (1944) ‎ →‎German victory…is there even an argument against this? Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 21:2221:22, 12 July 2023 diff hist +1,491‎ Talk:Operation Jupiter (1944) ‎ →‎German victory…is there even an argument against this?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
• 20:2920:29, 12 July 2023 diff hist +558‎ Operation Windsor ‎ See talkpage.
• 20:2120:21, 12 July 2023 diff hist +957‎ Talk:Operation Windsor ‎ →‎Result: new section Tag: New topic
• 20:0920:09, 12 July 2023 diff hist +39‎ Operation Windsor ‎ Undid revision 1165062150 by Keith-264 (talk) “original research”? All the sources I can find say that the village was captured, and the airfield was not. All I did is put “see Aftermath”, I cant find a single source calling this operation an allied victory or allied defeat, in the meantime “see aftermath” it is, you’re the one that needs a source to call it one way or the other. Tag: Undo
• 15:2015:20, 12 July 2023 diff hist +39‎ Operation Windsor ‎ One of the two objectives, arguably the more important one, was not acheived. More complicated result than implied Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 04:2904:29, 12 July 2023 diff hist +1‎ Operation Charnwood ‎ Still fighting north of the orne on the 10th Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

8 July 2023

• 13:2213:22, 8 July 2023 diff hist 0‎ Second Battle of the Marne ‎ →‎Assessment Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 13:1213:12, 8 July 2023 diff hist −23‎ Battle of the Somme ‎ Restored earlier version. Why did the user up the German casualty to 500,000 when c. 440,000 was the balanced one? Tag: Manual revert
• 13:0713:07, 8 July 2023 diff hist +516‎ Second Battle of the Marne ‎ →‎Assessment: why do virtually all the authors cite 110,000 German casualties, including Zebecki btw despite being cited for 168,000 elsewhere, while Hart gives the higher number? I would like an explanation for why the high number is preferred if people want to add it back Tag: Reverted
• 12:5812:58, 8 July 2023 diff hist +277‎ Battle of Soissons (1918) ‎ Idib Tags: Manual revert Reverted
• 12:5712:57, 8 July 2023 diff hist +476‎ Battle of Soissons (1918) ‎ Same problems as 2nd Marne page, same reasons for changing it back (check its edit history). Id like an actual reason for reversion. Tags: Manual revert Reverted
• 12:5512:55, 8 July 2023 diff hist +584‎ Second Battle of the Marne ‎ Ummm the number you removed is also “sourced”, and better I might add. Btw your explanation on the dates makes no sense, 2nd Marne was agreed to be July 15-August 6 before you changed it, and the American number is from the CMH (Center of Military History) the official military history of the US military Tags: Manual revert Reverted