User contributions for 75.152.124.107

2 March 2014

• 15:5115:51, 2 March 2014 diff hist +711 User talk:Zad68 →Baby colic Do not use primary source when secondary source available.: new section
• 11:0711:07, 2 March 2014 diff hist +410 User talk:QuackGuru →Baby colic: new section
• 10:5310:53, 2 March 2014 diff hist +388 User talk:Doc James →Ultimatum: new section
• 07:2507:25, 2 March 2014 diff hist +3 Talk:Baby colic Downgrading rating.
• 07:2007:20, 2 March 2014 diff hist +233 Talk:Baby colic →You are off topic
• 07:1407:14, 2 March 2014 diff hist +2 User talk:QuackGuru →"The only criterion for inclusion is never verifiability."
• 07:1307:13, 2 March 2014 diff hist +51 User talk:QuackGuru →"The only criterion for inclusion is never verifiability."
• 07:0407:04, 2 March 2014 diff hist +220 User talk:QuackGuru →"The only criterion for inclusion is never verifiability.": new section
• 07:0007:00, 2 March 2014 diff hist +328 Talk:Baby colic →Why can't I refute a secondary source with a primary source?
• 06:5406:54, 2 March 2014 diff hist +24 Talk:Baby colic →Why can't I refute a secondary source with a primary source?: new section
• 03:5703:57, 2 March 2014 diff hist −4,179 User talk:Doc James →Why can't I refute a secondary source with a primary source?
• 03:5303:53, 2 March 2014 diff hist −68 Talk:Baby colic →Why can't I refute a secondary source with a primary source?: Deleting duplicate.
• 03:5103:51, 2 March 2014 diff hist +4,447 Talk:Baby colic →Why can't I refute a secondary source with a primary source?: new section
• 03:4003:40, 2 March 2014 diff hist +51,051 Baby colic Policy allows primary sources. Eliminating deletionistic input from Doc James in reversion to 2013-06-22 11:54. The only criterion for inclusion iz verifiability.
• 03:2203:22, 2 March 2014 diff hist +1,141 User talk:Doc James →Why can't I refute a secondary source with a primary source?