User contributions for 74.98.44.216

8 November 2009

• 03:2903:29, 8 November 2009 diff hist +35‎ Mathematical fallacy ‎ →‎Proof that 2 = 1
• 03:2803:28, 8 November 2009 diff hist −7‎ Mathematical fallacy ‎ →‎Proof that 2 = 1
• 03:2503:25, 8 November 2009 diff hist −5‎ User talk:Point-set topologist ‎ ce →‎Regarding the revert
• 03:2403:24, 8 November 2009 diff hist −2‎ Mathematical fallacy ‎ perhaps this will clarify things. →‎Proof that 2 = 1
• 03:1603:16, 8 November 2009 diff hist +410‎ User talk:Point-set topologist ‎ explanation of revert →‎Regarding the revert
• 03:1403:14, 8 November 2009 diff hist +346‎ Mathematical fallacy ‎ revert removal of properly sourced content. Undid revision 324574908 by Point-set topologist (talk)
• 02:0102:01, 8 November 2009 diff hist +236‎ Ham sandwich theorem ‎ state "ham and cheese" version in the lead.

7 November 2009

• 23:4123:41, 7 November 2009 diff hist −627‎ Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics ‎ on second thouht, not really Undid revision 324541608 by 74.98.44.216 (talk)
• 23:0823:08, 7 November 2009 diff hist +627‎ Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics ‎ actually, already covered. →‎Continued fractions
• 23:0423:04, 7 November 2009 diff hist −95‎ Nth root ‎ shortened continued fraction display →‎Computing principal roots
• 23:0223:02, 7 November 2009 diff hist −1,457‎ Nth root ‎ tightened recent addition. This is too detailed for the main article. Consider forking off to a different article. →‎Computing principal roots
• 22:5622:56, 7 November 2009 diff hist +441‎ Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics ‎ move to a new article? →‎Continued fractions
• 21:5321:53, 7 November 2009 diff hist +78‎ Mathematical fallacy ‎ added diagram →‎Proof that any triangle is isosceles
• 21:2921:29, 7 November 2009 diff hist +5‎ Mathematical fallacy ‎ Ok. Barbeau does analyze a variant of this as we have done. Moved citation up to a better spot. Added {{cn}} tag to pushforward part. →‎Proof that 2 = 1
• 20:5920:59, 7 November 2009 diff hist +174‎ Mathematical fallacy ‎ added another citation, unforunately also without explicit analysis. →‎Proof that 2 = 1
• 17:3017:30, 7 November 2009 diff hist −12‎ Mathematical fallacy ‎ removed unnecessary bold
• 17:2917:29, 7 November 2009 diff hist +95‎ Howler ‎ *A kind of mathematical fallacy
• 17:1117:11, 7 November 2009 diff hist +8‎ Mathematical fallacy ‎ More authoritative reference. →‎Introduction
• 17:1017:10, 7 November 2009 diff hist +504‎ Mathematical fallacy ‎ howlers →‎Introduction
• 17:0217:02, 7 November 2009 diff hist +538‎ Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics ‎ r →‎What to do with article invalid proof
• 16:5816:58, 7 November 2009 diff hist +216‎ Mathematical fallacy ‎ another reference →‎References
• 16:2316:23, 7 November 2009 diff hist +87‎ Mathematical fallacy ‎ outworn →‎Introduction
• 16:1816:18, 7 November 2009 diff hist −29‎ Mathematical fallacy ‎ complex numbers should not be mentioned, except in the resolution of the fallacy (which here seems unnecessary). →‎Version 3
• 16:1216:12, 7 November 2009 diff hist −7‎ Mathematical fallacy ‎ reordered examples. Gave a reference. Copyedits. →‎Power and root
• 16:0716:07, 7 November 2009 diff hist −617‎ Mathematical fallacy ‎ This fallacy is now already mentioned above, more tightly. →‎Proof that all numbers are equal Tag: section blanking
• 16:0716:07, 7 November 2009 diff hist +71‎ Mathematical fallacy ‎ further condensing. →‎Proof that 2 = 1
• 16:0516:05, 7 November 2009 diff hist −336‎ Mathematical fallacy ‎ condensed. This really is just a trivial variant of the above. No "correction" to the proof is implied. →‎Division by zero
• 15:5315:53, 7 November 2009 diff hist +606‎ Mathematical fallacy ‎ Started to write an introduction
• 15:3515:35, 7 November 2009 diff hist +777‎ Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics ‎ r →‎What to do with article invalid proof
• 15:2515:25, 7 November 2009 diff hist +33‎ Mathematical fallacy ‎ fair warning →‎Proof that 1 = 0
• 15:2415:24, 7 November 2009 diff hist +34‎ Mathematical fallacy ‎ {{OR section}}: consider this fair warning (if the year-old "unreferenced" tag wasn't enough). →‎Proof that 1 = 0
• 15:2215:22, 7 November 2009 diff hist +407‎ Mathematical fallacy ‎ added a paragraph as a preliminary attempt to summarize the contents of the article.
• 15:1415:14, 7 November 2009 diff hist +32‎ Mathematical fallacy ‎ +
• 15:1315:13, 7 November 2009 diff hist +219‎ Mathematical fallacy ‎ Reference for Pseudaria.
• 14:5714:57, 7 November 2009 diff hist +553‎ Mathematical fallacy ‎ rewrote lead from sources
• 14:4314:43, 7 November 2009 diff hist +2‎ Mathematical fallacy ‎ fmt →‎References
• 14:4314:43, 7 November 2009 diff hist +168‎ Mathematical fallacy ‎ Another general reference on the subject of the article. →‎References
• 14:3614:36, 7 November 2009 diff hist +1,029‎ Talk:Mathematical fallacy ‎ reply →‎Error in Proof that 2 =1 in section Calculus
• 14:2914:29, 7 November 2009 diff hist +2‎ Mathematical fallacy ‎ corrected →‎Proof that 2 = 1
• 14:2114:21, 7 November 2009 diff hist +521‎ Christoffel symbols ‎ proper definition
• 14:1514:15, 7 November 2009 diff hist +137‎ Christoffel symbols ‎ mention Riemann curvature tensor as an example
• 14:1314:13, 7 November 2009 diff hist +909‎ Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics ‎ →‎What to do with article invalid proof: new section
• 14:0814:08, 7 November 2009 diff hist +368‎ Talk:Mathematical fallacy ‎ r →‎Explanation of revert
• 14:0414:04, 7 November 2009 diff hist +25‎ Talk:Mathematical fallacy ‎ refactoring. PST does not address the "cleanup" issue, but rather attempts to justify the revert.→‎Proposed cleanup
• 14:0214:02, 7 November 2009 diff hist +687‎ Talk:Mathematical fallacy ‎ r →‎Proposed cleanup
• 13:5613:56, 7 November 2009 diff hist +106‎ Christoffel symbols ‎ corrections, cleanup. →‎Definition
• 13:5113:51, 7 November 2009 diff hist −317‎ Christoffel symbols ‎ Removed editorialization.
• 13:5013:50, 7 November 2009 diff hist −1‎ Christoffel symbols ‎ often -> also
• 13:5013:50, 7 November 2009 diff hist −392‎ Christoffel symbols ‎ corrected and tightened lead. (They don't "measure curvature" as the old version stated, etc.)
• 13:4013:40, 7 November 2009 diff hist +59‎ Christoffel symbols ‎ seems important to point out that it does not behave tensorially under general coordinate transformations.