User contributions for 73.110.36.118

For 73.110.36.118 talk block log logs filter log
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽

9 May 2024

  • 23:5523:55, 9 May 2024 diff hist +365 Timbs v. IndianaAdding a tag and an in-text note, to call the use of the three underscore law citation formalism inappropriate for a general audience, in the opening sentence of a WIkipedia article lead. Tag: Reverted

20 April 2024

  • 09:0909:09, 20 April 2024 diff hist +19 Murder of Reena VirkAdding Slate article to the lead mention of moral panic, as this is the most widely read source wherein that phrase is used, and it is a secondary source, vs. the primary research references (journal articles) that are cited.
  • 09:0509:05, 20 April 2024 diff hist −395 Murder of Reena VirkRemoving a duplicate citation, using <ref name= markup. Completed the Nothof citation. Tag: references removed
  • 08:5808:58, 20 April 2024 diff hist +130 Murder of Reena VirkIndicating that citations of audiovisual content in support of specific facts must include the timestamp within the production that the fact appears. Citations to the long AV Dateline production now bear a full citation tag ({{full... markup).
  • 08:5008:50, 20 April 2024 diff hist +2,023 Murder of Reena VirkREPLACED WHOLLY UNREFERENCED SECTION TAGGED AS SUCH FOR OVER A DECADE (!) WITH A SHORTER SOURCED SECTION. The hidden, prior content that is unsourced can be moved into the appearing shorter section as sources for the content are found. OTHERWISE, LEAVING IT WOULD CONSTITUTE WP:OR AND/OR PLAGIARISM; IT IS NOT SKY-IS-BLUE CONTENT. This edit constitutes a formal challenge to that and remaining unsourced content in this article. (Rules state that unsourced content must be removed if challenged.)

19 April 2024

21 March 2024

20 May 2023

  • 02:5702:57, 20 May 2023 diff hist +43 Samuel J. Heyman→‎Business career: Addressing persistent WP:VERIFY violations: (a) misuse of citations [placement of citations at end of paragraphs, suggesting that while of paragraph is supported by the citation, when this is untrue], and (b) paucity of citations making clear from where the material was drawn [besides the bulk of of paragraphs having just one citation at paragraph end, several have no citations at all]. Bottom line, the section is untrustworthy, even by WP's own standards (see WP:VERI... Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

17 May 2023