User contributions for 71.161.114.16
Appearance
Results for 71.161.114.16 talk block log logs global block log filter log
9 October 2024
- 20:0220:02, 9 October 2024 diff hist +882 Elizabeth Prelogar Undid revision 1250332208 by Snickers2686 (talk) Again, no reason provided. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 19:5819:58, 9 October 2024 diff hist +882 Elizabeth Prelogar Undid revision 1250331035 by Snickers2686 (talk) No reason for reversion given. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 19:5519:55, 9 October 2024 diff hist +671 User talk:71.161.114.16 →October 2024: Reply Tag: Reply
- 19:4719:47, 9 October 2024 diff hist +645 User talk:71.161.114.16 →October 2024: Reply Tag: Reply
- 19:4019:40, 9 October 2024 diff hist +882 Elizabeth Prelogar Undid revision 1250327715 by Snickers2686 (talk) Where do you see the word controversy here? It's literally her own words, from the SCOTUS transcripts. Absolutely nothing more than that. Now, I was in the process of adding further citations of controversy (that would support it), but was reverted before I had the chance. But its not even needed after I thought about it. Tag: Undo
- 19:2419:24, 9 October 2024 diff hist +239 User talk:71.161.114.16 →October 2024: Reply Tag: Reply
- 19:1519:15, 9 October 2024 diff hist +882 Elizabeth Prelogar Undid revision 1250324299 by Innisfree987 (talk) A statement of FACT isn't "Original Research". Stop undo'ing LEGAL STATEMENTS made at SCOTUS lmfao. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 19:0019:00, 9 October 2024 diff hist +882 Elizabeth Prelogar →Career Tag: Reverted
- 16:2616:26, 9 October 2024 diff hist +1,619 Elizabeth Prelogar →Career Tag: Reverted