User contributions for 70.162.149.36

18 November 2013

• 01:0101:01, 18 November 2013 diff hist +336 Multi-factor authentication →Vulnerability to attacking
• 00:5400:54, 18 November 2013 diff hist −251 Multi-factor authentication →Vulnerability to attacking: By definition, any out-of-band method is vulnerable to MITM. Once you separate the entity being authenticated from the entity performing the auth, MITM becomes possible.
• 00:4800:48, 18 November 2013 diff hist +9 Multi-factor authentication →Magnetic stripe cards: statements such as "virtually impossible to clone" are false and should be toned down to adhere to the academic tone of this article
• 00:4600:46, 18 November 2013 diff hist −23 Multi-factor authentication →Connected tokens: the use of the term "virtual" is confusing since it may refer to virtual tokens, a process fundamentally different from the processes described within this section
• 00:4400:44, 18 November 2013 diff hist +7 Multi-factor authentication →Soft tokens (computer-simulated virtual tokens): Virtual tokens are fundamentally different from soft tokens.

27 July 2013

• 16:3416:34, 27 July 2013 diff hist +2,457 User talk:ViperSnake151 →Re: multifactor authentication reverts
• 16:2916:29, 27 July 2013 diff hist +772 User talk:ViperSnake151 →Re: multifactor authentication reverts: new section
• 16:0716:07, 27 July 2013 diff hist +1,873 Multi-factor authentication Undid revision 566028303 by ViperSnake151 (talk) this content has been part of this page for years. Please do not remove relevant information from this page.
• 14:2714:27, 27 July 2013 diff hist +1,873 Multi-factor authentication Undid revision 565968206 by ViperSnake151 (talk) Virtual token information is not spam. No vendor is referenced. Please do not remove

17 July 2013

• 01:1001:10, 17 July 2013 diff hist −140 Multi-factor authentication →External links: dead link
• 01:0301:03, 17 July 2013 diff hist +2 User talk:Lsmll →Re: Multifactor Authentication spurious content
• 01:0301:03, 17 July 2013 diff hist +1,315 User talk:Lsmll →Re: Multifactor Authentication spurious content
• 00:4300:43, 17 July 2013 diff hist −24 Multi-factor authentication No edit summary
• 00:4000:40, 17 July 2013 diff hist +335 Talk:Multi-factor authentication →Re: "Social Network Factor" - Please do not add unapproved factors to this article: to clarify this article's content
• 00:3800:38, 17 July 2013 diff hist +327 User talk:Lsmll →Re: Multifactor Authentication spurious content
• 00:3500:35, 17 July 2013 diff hist +1,209 Talk:Multi-factor authentication →Re: "Social Network Factor" - Please do not add unapproved factors to this article: additional
• 00:2800:28, 17 July 2013 diff hist +1,066 User talk:Lsmll →Re: Multifactor Authentication spurious content: new section
• 00:2300:23, 17 July 2013 diff hist −2,212 Multi-factor authentication Undid revision 564585069 by Lsmll (talk) This article's content is intended to address the THREE factors defined with the Homeland Security Presidential Directive 12 (HSPD-12).

16 July 2013

• 15:3215:32, 16 July 2013 diff hist +916 Talk:Multi-factor authentication →Re: "Social Network Factor" - Please do not add unrelated factors to this article: new section
• 15:2615:26, 16 July 2013 diff hist −1,658 Multi-factor authentication Undid revision 564488482 by Radiochemist (talk) This is not a factor recognized or approved by the FFIEC or any regulatory body

16 April 2013

• 15:4015:40, 16 April 2013 diff hist −6 User talk:178.238.147.105 →April 16 2013
• 15:3915:39, 16 April 2013 diff hist −2 User talk:178.238.147.105 →April 16 2013
• 15:3915:39, 16 April 2013 diff hist +425 N User talk:178.238.147.105 ←Created page with '== April 16 2013 == I reviewed the unsourced content on Security token and Multi-factor authentication. It is authoritativ...'
• 15:2615:26, 16 April 2013 diff hist +1,691 Security token Undo censorship attempt under the guise of source relevance. I have reviewed the references and they are appropriate and relevant to this section.
• 15:2515:25, 16 April 2013 diff hist +2,028 Multi-factor authentication Undo censorship attempt under the guise of source relevance. I have reviewed the references and they are appropriate and relevant to this section.