User contributions for 70.109.180.126

23 March 2010

• 02:5202:52, 23 March 2010 diff hist +371‎ Talk:Planck units ‎ →‎Excuse the naivete of a non-physicist

22 March 2010

• 20:4220:42, 22 March 2010 diff hist +3‎ Talk:Fine-tuned universe ‎ →‎There is no firm scientific consensus that the fine-tuning hypothesis...
• 20:4120:41, 22 March 2010 diff hist +1,228‎ Talk:Fine-tuned universe ‎ →‎There is no firm scientific consensus that the fine-tuning hypothesis...
• 20:0420:04, 22 March 2010 diff hist +1,361‎ Talk:Wavetable synthesis ‎ →‎Ugh! This article is as clear as mud.
• 01:3401:34, 22 March 2010 diff hist +360‎ Fine-tuned universe ‎ Put in a Stenger quote to balance the Davies quote. It's not the strongest, because it is essentially arguing against Carbon chauvinism.

20 March 2010

• 20:5520:55, 20 March 2010 diff hist +728‎ User talk:Excirial ‎ →‎About Fine-tuned Universe: new section
• 20:4420:44, 20 March 2010 diff hist +75‎ Fine-tuned universe ‎ Trying to head of an edit war. Returned disputed statement that existed in this article previously.
• 20:4120:41, 20 March 2010 diff hist +2,337‎ Talk:Fine-tuned universe ‎ →‎There is no firm scientific consensus that the fine-tuning hypothesis...
• 04:2404:24, 20 March 2010 diff hist −39‎ Dimensionless physical constant ‎ →‎The Standard Model: See talk page.
• 04:2204:22, 20 March 2010 diff hist +1,037‎ Talk:Dimensionless physical constant ‎ →‎Masses of quarks and leptons..: new section

19 March 2010

• 18:5618:56, 19 March 2010 diff hist +1,387‎ Talk:Fine-tuned universe ‎ →‎There is no firm scientific consensus that the fine-tuning hypothesis...
• 06:4206:42, 19 March 2010 diff hist −6‎ Talk:Fine-tuned universe ‎ →‎There is no firm scientific consensus that the fine-tuning hypothesis...: m
• 06:4006:40, 19 March 2010 diff hist +602‎ Talk:Fine-tuned universe ‎ →‎There is no firm scientific consensus that the fine-tuning hypothesis...

18 March 2010

• 17:3817:38, 18 March 2010 diff hist +9‎ Filter design ‎ →‎Digital filters: There are FIR filters that *may* have feedback. e.g. Moving average filters.
• 15:3015:30, 18 March 2010 diff hist +14‎ Huntington–Hill method ‎ Cosmetic
• 04:5704:57, 18 March 2010 diff hist +12‎ Planck units ‎ →‎Planck units and the invariant scaling of nature: Fix red link.

17 March 2010

• 17:2017:20, 17 March 2010 diff hist +1‎ Fine-tuned universe ‎ Undid revision 350393363 by 130.88.30.112 (talk) "Paul Davies" is the object of the sentence. "Proponents" is the subject.
• 01:2701:27, 17 March 2010 diff hist +174‎ Talk:Big ball of mud ‎ →‎How is this different from spaghetti code?: new section
• 01:2301:23, 17 March 2010 diff hist +58‎ Workaround ‎ Connect to the concept of anti-pattern.

16 March 2010

• 16:4416:44, 16 March 2010 diff hist +18‎ MATLAB ‎ →‎Limitations: Actually there *are* several differing standard definitions of the DFT, but *none* put the DC term into X[1] (except MATLAB). So it's not redundant.

14 March 2010

• 06:5106:51, 14 March 2010 diff hist +101‎ Fine-tuned universe ‎ Linkify a little.
• 06:3006:30, 14 March 2010 diff hist +645‎ Fine-tuned universe ‎ There is no firm consensus, but the fact that there are physicists on both sides should be cited. If anyone can yank a good quote out of Stenger's writings, please include it.