User contributions for 69.196.135.120

4 September 2011

• 05:0905:09, 4 September 2011 diff hist +483‎ User talk:RiseupRiseup ‎No edit summary
• 04:1204:12, 4 September 2011 diff hist +658‎ User talk:RiseupRiseup ‎No edit summary
• 03:5603:56, 4 September 2011 diff hist +221‎ User talk:RiseupRiseup ‎No edit summary
• 03:5403:54, 4 September 2011 diff hist +69‎ CKLN-FM ‎ the article is about both. No reason to remove logo or former frequency or other info.
• 03:4203:42, 4 September 2011 diff hist +69‎ CKLN-FM ‎ The article is also about a former FM radio station so including their logo is legit.
• 03:3903:39, 4 September 2011 diff hist +375‎ User talk:RiseupRiseup ‎No edit summary
• 03:3603:36, 4 September 2011 diff hist +233‎ Wikipedia:Requests for page protection ‎ →‎Current requests for protection
• 03:3403:34, 4 September 2011 diff hist −1,974‎ CKLN-FM ‎ Removing personal observations and original research. Tag: references removed
• 03:2803:28, 4 September 2011 diff hist +262‎ N User talk:RiseupRiseup ‎ ←Created page with 'Please see Wikipedia:No original research. You're not permitted to add personal observations or original research to Wikipedia articles. ~~~~'
• 03:2403:24, 4 September 2011 diff hist +347‎ Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard ‎ →‎CKLN.fm: new section

2 September 2011

• 04:2304:23, 2 September 2011 diff hist +82‎ CKLN-FM ‎ →‎Internal conflict and loss of licence
• 04:2104:21, 2 September 2011 diff hist −573‎ CKLN-FM ‎ it's not notable that each board accused the other of being illegitimate or of using letterhead without authorization. It's a violation of NPOV to list Board 1's claim that Board 2 was illigetimate without also detailing the reverse claims.
• 04:1904:19, 2 September 2011 diff hist +573‎ CKLN-FM ‎No edit summary
• 04:1604:16, 2 September 2011 diff hist +1‎ CKLN-FM ‎ →‎Internal conflict and loss of licence
• 04:1404:14, 2 September 2011 diff hist −397‎ CKLN-FM ‎ unsourced
• 04:1404:14, 2 September 2011 diff hist −177‎ CKLN-FM ‎ NPOV, article can't take sides on which board was legitimate, particularly as the courts never resolved the issue. Saying there were two rival boards is neutral. Saying one board was legit and the other a "shadow" takes sides

1 September 2011

• 02:3502:35, 1 September 2011 diff hist +714‎ User talk:Prawnsyscheme ‎ →‎Bad quoting: new section current
• 02:3102:31, 1 September 2011 diff hist −229‎ CKLN-FM ‎ That's not how you quote articles (ie pass off paraphrasing as a direct quote from an individual).
• 02:2702:27, 1 September 2011 diff hist 0‎ CKLN-FM ‎No edit summary
• 02:2502:25, 1 September 2011 diff hist −4‎ CKLN-FM ‎No edit summary
• 02:2502:25, 1 September 2011 diff hist 0‎ CKLN-FM ‎ While individual reps on Palin Foundation has changed, the institutional representation on the Foundation board remains the same (ie university admin, RSU, CESAR etc) so citation is still relevant.
• 02:2302:23, 1 September 2011 diff hist +228‎ CKLN-FM ‎ That's not a legitimate reason for removing Ryerson Free Press citation.

31 August 2011

• 03:1503:15, 31 August 2011 diff hist −3‎ CKLN-FM ‎ →‎Move to Regent Park
• 03:1403:14, 31 August 2011 diff hist +36‎ CKLN-FM ‎No edit summary