User contributions for 68.9.116.87

19 November 2006

• 20:4020:40, 19 November 2006 diff hist +274‎ Talk:Leo Frank ‎ →‎Why does SlimVirgin revert without explaining?
• 20:3720:37, 19 November 2006 diff hist +46‎ Leo Frank ‎ SlimVirgin, please stop reverting WITHOUT explaination. Isn't that considered vandalism or something. Lets take it to the talk page or don't you do that??
• 20:1620:16, 19 November 2006 diff hist +135‎ Leo Frank ‎ →‎Clemency
• 20:1520:15, 19 November 2006 diff hist −23‎ Leo Frank ‎ →‎Clemency: rewrite of attempted mob attack.
• 20:1120:11, 19 November 2006 diff hist +486‎ Talk:Anti-Defamation League ‎ →‎Leo Frank case
• 20:0720:07, 19 November 2006 diff hist +55‎ Anti-Defamation League ‎ ok, did it.
• 19:5519:55, 19 November 2006 diff hist −66‎ Leo Frank ‎ See talk page.
• 19:5119:51, 19 November 2006 diff hist +580‎ Talk:Anti-Defamation League ‎ →‎Leo Frank case
• 19:4419:44, 19 November 2006 diff hist −248‎ Anti-Defamation League ‎ →‎History: removed POV statement.Slaton NEVER said he was innocent, he said he believed that Frank had not received a fair trial and had been convicted on circumstantial evidence, BIG DIFFERENCE...
• 17:1517:15, 19 November 2006 diff hist +369‎ Talk:Anti-Defamation League ‎ →‎Leo Frank case
• 17:0617:06, 19 November 2006 diff hist +176‎ Talk:Anti-Defamation League ‎ →‎Leo Frank case
• 17:0417:04, 19 November 2006 diff hist −54‎ Anti-Defamation League ‎ That source DOES NOT say that he was proven innocent, DOES IT?? NO. So please provide a source that says "he was PROVEN INNOCENT" or remove that claim, thats all.
• 17:0117:01, 19 November 2006 diff hist −66‎ Leo Frank ‎ Please see talk page and discuss there before reverting wothout explaination, isn't that considered vandalism?
• 17:0017:00, 19 November 2006 diff hist +156‎ Talk:Leo Frank ‎ →‎Category Wrongly convicted Americans or whatever
• 14:0114:01, 19 November 2006 diff hist +603‎ Talk:Leo Frank ‎ →‎Category Wrongly convicted Americans or whatever
• 13:5513:55, 19 November 2006 diff hist −66‎ Leo Frank ‎ Still NO sources. Frank was pardoned, which is TOTALLY different from being wrongly convicted. Please do not add this back in. Go look at ALL the other people in that category.ADL article???
• 13:5313:53, 19 November 2006 diff hist +8‎ Anti-Defamation League ‎ →‎History: asked for source
• 13:5213:52, 19 November 2006 diff hist +87‎ Talk:Anti-Defamation League ‎ →‎Leo Frank case

18 November 2006

• 01:5601:56, 18 November 2006 diff hist −66‎ Leo Frank ‎ Still NO sources. Frank was pardoned, which is TOTALLY different from being wrongly convicted. Please do not add this back in. Go look at ALL the other people in that category.Thanks.

17 November 2006

• 04:5904:59, 17 November 2006 diff hist +162‎ Talk:Anthony Johnson (colonist) ‎No edit summary
• 04:5504:55, 17 November 2006 diff hist +235‎ Talk:Leo Frank ‎ →‎Category Wrongly convicted Americans or whatever
• 04:4804:48, 17 November 2006 diff hist −49‎ Tony Roper (racing driver) ‎ pov
• 04:4404:44, 17 November 2006 diff hist −7‎ Albrecht Brandi ‎No edit summary
• 04:4304:43, 17 November 2006 diff hist +8‎ Royaumont Abbey ‎No edit summary
• 04:3804:38, 17 November 2006 diff hist −15‎ Tetsuya (musician) ‎ pov
• 04:3404:34, 17 November 2006 diff hist +162‎ User talk:IronDuke ‎ →‎Why delete comments from your talk page??
• 04:2704:27, 17 November 2006 diff hist +288‎ User talk:SlimVirgin/History 2 ‎ Leo Frank article comment
• 04:2404:24, 17 November 2006 diff hist +271‎ Talk:Leo Frank ‎ →‎Category Wrongly convicted Americans or whatever
• 03:5903:59, 17 November 2006 diff hist +197‎ Talk:Leo Frank ‎No edit summary
• 03:5803:58, 17 November 2006 diff hist −66‎ Leo Frank ‎ standard view?? Just provide SOURCES saying that this man was wrongly convicted and then add it back in. Why is that difficult??
• 03:1403:14, 17 November 2006 diff hist −66‎ Leo Frank ‎ Ironduke, please stop adding UNSOURCED material to this article, thanks
• 02:3902:39, 17 November 2006 diff hist −66‎ Leo Frank ‎ removed unsourced material...
• 02:3802:38, 17 November 2006 diff hist 0‎ Alan Berg ‎ spelling
• 02:3702:37, 17 November 2006 diff hist −30‎ Alan Berg ‎ wiki style
• 02:0902:09, 17 November 2006 diff hist +286‎ User talk:IronDuke ‎ comment
• 01:5201:52, 17 November 2006 diff hist −8‎ Leo Frank ‎ does not belong in the header
• 01:2901:29, 17 November 2006 diff hist +48‎ Kahanism ‎ please stop, now you have delted TWO relevant categores, stop POV and leave them in, they are BOTH relevant to THIS article
• 01:2601:26, 17 November 2006 diff hist +82‎ Talk:Kahanism ‎ →‎Why [[:Category:Racism]] is Redundant
• 01:2401:24, 17 November 2006 diff hist −139‎ Talk:Kahanism ‎ →‎Added category Racism: sorry, wrong paragraph
• 01:2201:22, 17 November 2006 diff hist +772‎ Talk:Kahanism ‎ →‎Added category Racism
• 01:1901:19, 17 November 2006 diff hist +202‎ Talk:Kahanism ‎No edit summary
• 01:1701:17, 17 November 2006 diff hist +21‎ Kahanism ‎ revert, HOW is it redundant?? Do you deny that racism is discussed or that it is relevant?? Why don't you want this category included, please come clean...
• 00:4100:41, 17 November 2006 diff hist +21‎ Kahanism ‎ no its NOT and if it was SO WHAT!! This category is VERY appropriate to this article, stop agenda pushing please, thanks
• 00:3900:39, 17 November 2006 diff hist +36‎ Baruch Marzel ‎ please stop, racism is NOT listed anywhere, this category is approriate, stop POV agenda pushing, thanks

16 November 2006

• 21:5121:51, 16 November 2006 diff hist +21‎ Kahanism ‎ →‎Kahanist and Kahane related websites: added category
• 21:4921:49, 16 November 2006 diff hist +36‎ Baruch Marzel ‎ re added category, not redundant at all
• 21:4321:43, 16 November 2006 diff hist −80‎ Forest Hills, Queens ‎ not notable
• 21:3521:35, 16 November 2006 diff hist +5‎ Amy Gutmann ‎ →‎Halloween Controversy
• 21:3121:31, 16 November 2006 diff hist +19‎ University of Pennsylvania ‎ →‎Halloween incident: updated
• 00:5900:59, 16 November 2006 diff hist +183‎ User talk:Netscott/Archive-05 ‎No edit summary