User contributions for 67.246.15.110

25 November 2020

• 15:2015:20, 25 November 2020 diff hist +482‎ Talk:Acupressure ‎ →‎Please stop removing new scientific information from the last 10 years and reverting to quackwatch
• 15:1715:17, 25 November 2020 diff hist +243‎ Talk:Acupressure ‎ →‎Please stop removing new scientific information from the last 10 years and reverting to quackwatch
• 15:1615:16, 25 November 2020 diff hist +181‎ Talk:Acupressure ‎ →‎Please stop removing new scientific information from the last 10 years and reverting to quackwatch
• 15:0615:06, 25 November 2020 diff hist +157‎ Talk:Acupressure ‎ →‎Please stop removing new scientific information from the last 10 years and reverting to quackwatch
• 14:5514:55, 25 November 2020 diff hist 0‎ User talk:Pepperbeast ‎ →‎Acupressuer
• 14:5514:55, 25 November 2020 diff hist +1,377‎ User talk:Pepperbeast ‎ →‎Acupressuer: new section
• 14:2514:25, 25 November 2020 diff hist +867‎ Talk:Acupressure ‎ →‎Please stop removing new scientific information from the last 10 years and reverting to quackwatch: new section
• 14:2114:21, 25 November 2020 diff hist +2,720‎ Acupressure ‎ Undid revision 990613511 by Pepperbeast (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted
• 14:1514:15, 25 November 2020 diff hist +715‎ Acupressure ‎ included more detailed research demonstrating the existence of acupoints by using amperometric oxygen microsensor imaging. the science is out there, if people want to look for it. quackwatch is biased and out of date. new research is happening every year. Tags: Reverted Visual edit
• 13:5513:55, 25 November 2020 diff hist +2,005‎ Acupressure ‎ Undid revision 990604984 by Pepperbeast (talk) undoing removal of new information from science Tags: Undo Reverted
• 01:5401:54, 25 November 2020 diff hist +1,205‎ Talk:Acupressure ‎ →‎scientific updates in last 5-10 years: new section
• 01:4501:45, 25 November 2020 diff hist +2,005‎ Acupressure ‎ Undid revision 990534001 by McSly (talk) This article is out of date and contains evidence of clear bias, which was removed, and replaced with scientific studies. One can't simply say they are not good studies and yet consider quackwatch, a website promoted by a discredited non practicing psychologist somehow more credible. Please let the factual citations speak for themselves. Tags: Undo Reverted
• 00:3300:33, 25 November 2020 diff hist +2,005‎ Acupressure ‎ Undid revision 990528585 by Pepperbeast (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted

24 November 2020

• 23:2323:23, 24 November 2020 diff hist +2,618‎ Acupressure ‎ →‎Effectiveness: the section relied heavily on a study from 1996 and was missing the last 10 years worth of research demonstrating the structural existence of acupuncture points, as well as effectiveness of treatment in animal models (beyond placebo or bias). The article benefits from the addition of studies from the last 5 years, quotations, and summary of this new understanding. Tags: Reverted Visual edit