User contributions for 67.194.202.113

16 December 2008

• 15:4815:48, 16 December 2008 diff hist +374‎ Talk:Sikh religious extremism ‎ →‎Constituent Assembly to form a Theocratic State?: Throw this down quickly, I gotta go.
• 15:4115:41, 16 December 2008 diff hist +674‎ Talk:Sikh religious extremism ‎ →‎It can't be theocratic!: *Sigh*
• 15:3615:36, 16 December 2008 diff hist +430‎ Talk:Sikh religious extremism ‎ →‎Constituent Assembly to form a Theocratic State?: Ignoring the academic sources I brought even after I reminded you? Not cool.
• 15:2715:27, 16 December 2008 diff hist +367‎ Talk:Sikh religious extremism ‎ →‎Constituent Assembly to form a Theocratic State?: The basics, again.
• 15:2015:20, 16 December 2008 diff hist +644‎ Talk:Sikh religious extremism ‎ →‎It can't be theocratic!: Need to strike out.
• 15:1715:17, 16 December 2008 diff hist +614‎ Talk:Sikh religious extremism ‎ →‎It can't be theocratic!: We are not here to be original researchers.
• 15:0815:08, 16 December 2008 diff hist +596‎ Talk:Sikh religious extremism ‎ →‎Constituent Assembly to form a Theocratic State?: Absurd requirement.
• 15:0515:05, 16 December 2008 diff hist +25‎ Talk:Sikh religious extremism ‎ →‎It can't be theocratic!: Not cool
• 15:0515:05, 16 December 2008 diff hist +180‎ Talk:Sikh religious extremism ‎ →‎It can't be theocratic!: Now that's not cool.
• 15:0315:03, 16 December 2008 diff hist +202‎ Talk:Sikh religious extremism ‎ →‎It can't be theocratic!: Does "trump" mean "absolute"? Not my intended meaning.
• 15:0115:01, 16 December 2008 diff hist +476‎ Talk:Sikh religious extremism ‎ →‎It can't be theocratic!: It doesn't matter how many reliable sources I bring for you.
• 14:5814:58, 16 December 2008 diff hist +14‎ Talk:Sikh religious extremism ‎ →‎Constituent Assembly to form a Theocratic State?: Forgot this one.
• 14:5514:55, 16 December 2008 diff hist +1,023‎ Talk:Sikh religious extremism ‎ →‎Constituent Assembly to form a Theocratic State?: "These rules do not appply here." - classic!
• 14:4614:46, 16 December 2008 diff hist +1,111‎ Talk:Sikh religious extremism ‎ →‎It can't be theocratic!: This all seems a bit disingenuous now.
• 14:4614:46, 16 December 2008 diff hist +502‎ Talk:Sikh religious extremism ‎ →‎It can't be theocratic!: Admits that he does not wish to be constructive.
• 14:3414:34, 16 December 2008 diff hist +389‎ Talk:Sikh religious extremism ‎ →‎Constituent Assembly to form a Theocratic State?: The content rules prove remarkably hard for some to follow under very specific circumstances.
• 14:2114:21, 16 December 2008 diff hist +928‎ Talk:Sikh religious extremism ‎ →‎It can't be theocratic!: Brilliance strikes again.
• 14:1214:12, 16 December 2008 diff hist +647‎ User talk:67.194.202.113 ‎ →‎I am not yelling. I am not your buddy. You are insulting me whether you intend to or not. Stop It!: *Sniffle* I'm just trying to be friendly man.
• 12:3212:32, 16 December 2008 diff hist +8,783‎ Talk:Sikh religious extremism ‎ →‎It can't be theocratic!: new section
• 02:3302:33, 16 December 2008 diff hist +243‎ User talk:Roadahead ‎ →‎Style of editing at Sikh Extremism: Lions and tigers and bears! Oh my!
• 02:3002:30, 16 December 2008 diff hist +305‎ Talk:Sikh religious extremism ‎ →‎Sources. Lead-in content. Do we need theocratic and democratic in the lead-in?: Your personal objections are irrelevant.
• 02:2202:22, 16 December 2008 diff hist +165‎ User talk:67.194.202.113 ‎ →‎I am not yelling. I am not your buddy. You are insulting me whether you intend to or not. Stop It!: For the lulz.
• 01:5801:58, 16 December 2008 diff hist +444‎ Talk:Sikh religious extremism ‎ →‎Consensus for flag removal: Keep them, please.
• 01:5501:55, 16 December 2008 diff hist +603‎ Talk:Sikh religious extremism ‎ →‎Synthesis and cherry-picking: More of the same.
• 01:5301:53, 16 December 2008 diff hist +201‎ User talk:67.194.202.113 ‎ →‎I am not yelling. I am not your buddy. You are insulting me whether you intend to or not. Stop It!: How quaint.
• 01:4301:43, 16 December 2008 diff hist +993‎ User talk:67.194.202.113 ‎ →‎I am not yelling. I am not your buddy. You are insulting me whether you intend to or not. Stop It!: Why a politician advocating a cause should be treated like a expert is beyond me.
• 00:5600:56, 16 December 2008 diff hist +1,234‎ Talk:Ruhollah Khomeini ‎ →‎Lead neutrality: Yawn. Wow.
• 00:5400:54, 16 December 2008 diff hist +478‎ User talk:67.194.202.113 ‎ →‎I am not yelling. I am not your buddy. You are insulting me whether you intend to or not. Stop It!: More
• 00:0200:02, 16 December 2008 diff hist +1,142‎ Talk:Sikh religious extremism ‎ →‎Sikh Terrorism: Any extremism noted outside of the context of separatism?

15 December 2008

• 23:5523:55, 15 December 2008 diff hist +191‎ Talk:Sikh religious extremism ‎ →‎Sections still needed in support of the Lead-In.: WP:RS say theocracy, yay.
• 23:5323:53, 15 December 2008 diff hist +318‎ User talk:67.194.202.113 ‎ →‎I am not yelling. I am not your buddy. You are insulting me whether you intend to or not. Stop It!: Both count.
• 23:5223:52, 15 December 2008 diff hist +198‎ User talk:67.194.202.113 ‎ →‎I am not your editing secretary: False.
• 21:5621:56, 15 December 2008 diff hist +426‎ Talk:Sikh religious extremism ‎ →‎The Issue Is Far More Complex Than This: It ain't your name, honey-chile.
• 21:5321:53, 15 December 2008 diff hist +1,177‎ Talk:Sikh religious extremism ‎ →‎The Issue Is Far More Complex Than This: Be nice, guys.
• 21:4221:42, 15 December 2008 diff hist +571‎ Talk:Khalistan ‎ →‎Synthesis and cherry-picking: That's gotta' be a joke.
• 21:3821:38, 15 December 2008 diff hist +3‎ Khalistan ‎ We need this "or," though it doesn't go far enough (our article should emphasize "theocratic" MUCH more than any of these this fringe PR whitewash from unreliable sources claiming "democratic")
• 21:3621:36, 15 December 2008 diff hist −220‎ Khalistan ‎ Does not explicitly attest to "democratic" or "democracy."
• 18:5418:54, 15 December 2008 diff hist −92‎ Sikh religious extremism ‎ Correct me if am wrong, but I don't see anything about Khalistan being "democratic" in that source.
• 18:5118:51, 15 December 2008 diff hist +613‎ Talk:Sikh religious extremism ‎ →‎The Issue Is Far More Complex Than This: More of the same
• 18:4718:47, 15 December 2008 diff hist +571‎ User talk:67.194.202.113 ‎ →‎Sikh Extremism: The problem as I see it.
• 18:4418:44, 15 December 2008 diff hist +1,147‎ User talk:67.194.202.113 ‎ →‎I am not your editing secretary: Response to temper tantrum.
• 08:0208:02, 15 December 2008 diff hist +172‎ User talk:Roadahead ‎ →‎Question: new section
• 08:0108:01, 15 December 2008 diff hist +777‎ Talk:Diet in Sikhism ‎ →‎What is this edit war?: Still not clear how you have concluded the semantic opposite of the actual wording.
• 07:5007:50, 15 December 2008 diff hist +2,153‎ Talk:Sikh religious extremism ‎ →‎Synthesis and cherry-picking: Throwing it over here, with a de-indent because I am lazy.
• 07:4907:49, 15 December 2008 diff hist +2,153‎ Talk:Khalistan ‎ →‎Synthesis and cherry-picking: Extremist sources must not be used to obscure the mainstream view.
• 04:5404:54, 15 December 2008 diff hist +490‎ Talk:Sikh religious extremism ‎ →‎Sourcing - you can do better.: Please at least stop the synthesis.
• 04:5204:52, 15 December 2008 diff hist +2,460‎ Talk:Sikh religious extremism ‎ →‎Synthesis and cherry-picking: Same response here. I'd love it if this discussion was centralized.
• 04:5004:50, 15 December 2008 diff hist −199‎ Khalistan ‎ See talk page; this is synthesis, and a politician lobbying for a separatist or "human rights" cause cannot be placed among academics with regard to reliability.
• 04:5004:50, 15 December 2008 diff hist +2,460‎ Talk:Khalistan ‎ →‎Synthesis and cherry-picking: See this as several issues that remain unresolved.
• 00:3000:30, 15 December 2008 diff hist +799‎ Talk:Sikh religious extremism ‎ →‎Sources. Lead-in content. Do we need theocratic and democratic in the lead-in?: Hyphenation not justified by source, please stop soapboxing, and beware undue weight.