User contributions for 67.193.128.233

13 April 2009

• 22:0822:08, 13 April 2009 diff hist +1,964‎ Cauchy–Riemann equations ‎ Added proof (in both directions) of Cauchy Riemann equations
• 21:3221:32, 13 April 2009 diff hist +165‎ Talk:Cauchy–Riemann equations ‎ →‎Derivation
• 21:3021:30, 13 April 2009 diff hist +459‎ Talk:Cauchy–Riemann equations ‎ →‎"Not necessarily sufficient" ??!!

7 April 2009

• 14:3014:30, 7 April 2009 diff hist +475‎ Talk:Monty Hall problem ‎ →‎Is it just me or does this appear to be illogical?

20 March 2009

• 13:2913:29, 20 March 2009 diff hist +375‎ Talk:Monty Hall problem/Arguments ‎ →‎What is the effect of referring to one specific case?

19 March 2009

• 00:0300:03, 19 March 2009 diff hist +535‎ Talk:Monty Hall problem/Arguments ‎ →‎What is the effect of referring to one specific case?

12 March 2009

• 04:0204:02, 12 March 2009 diff hist +243‎ Talk:Gambler's fallacy ‎ →‎interesting charts

11 March 2009

• 20:2820:28, 11 March 2009 diff hist +424‎ Talk:Gambler's fallacy ‎ →‎interesting charts
• 20:1420:14, 11 March 2009 diff hist +415‎ Talk:Gambler's fallacy ‎ →‎interesting charts
• 20:0520:05, 11 March 2009 diff hist +346‎ Talk:Gambler's fallacy ‎ →‎interesting charts
• 12:3412:34, 11 March 2009 diff hist +1,262‎ Talk:Gambler's fallacy ‎ →‎interesting charts

10 March 2009

• 21:3121:31, 10 March 2009 diff hist +593‎ Talk:Gambler's fallacy ‎ →‎so doubling down does work?...
• 20:5620:56, 10 March 2009 diff hist +543‎ Talk:Gambler's fallacy ‎ →‎so doubling down does work?...
• 13:1513:15, 10 March 2009 diff hist +634‎ Talk:Gambler's fallacy ‎ →‎so doubling down does work?...
• 13:0113:01, 10 March 2009 diff hist +682‎ Talk:Gambler's fallacy ‎ →‎so doubling down does work?...
• 12:4012:40, 10 March 2009 diff hist +478‎ Talk:Expected value ‎ →‎Assumption missing?

9 March 2009

• 01:3901:39, 9 March 2009 diff hist −32‎ Talk:Dirac delta function ‎ →‎Definition of the Dirac Delta
• 01:3401:34, 9 March 2009 diff hist +521‎ Talk:Dirac delta function ‎ →‎Definition of the Dirac Delta

8 March 2009

• 18:1518:15, 8 March 2009 diff hist +167‎ Talk:Non-measurable set ‎ →‎Opening sentence
• 18:1218:12, 8 March 2009 diff hist +222‎ Talk:Non-measurable set ‎ →‎Opening sentence
• 17:3817:38, 8 March 2009 diff hist +595‎ Talk:Probability theory ‎ →‎Is a measure always positive?
• 13:5813:58, 8 March 2009 diff hist +444‎ Talk:Gambler's fallacy ‎ →‎so doubling down does work?...
• 13:4513:45, 8 March 2009 diff hist +713‎ Talk:Gambler's fallacy ‎ →‎so doubling down does work?...

7 March 2009

• 23:5223:52, 7 March 2009 diff hist +506‎ Talk:Gambler's fallacy ‎ →‎so doubling down does work?...
• 22:2022:20, 7 March 2009 diff hist +1,536‎ Talk:Gambler's fallacy ‎ →‎so doubling down does work?...
• 19:4219:42, 7 March 2009 diff hist +340‎ Talk:Gambler's fallacy ‎ →‎attrition

6 March 2009

• 02:0402:04, 6 March 2009 diff hist −749‎ User talk:67.193.128.233 ‎ →‎Your recent edits
• 00:3200:32, 6 March 2009 diff hist +30‎ Talk:Gambler's fallacy ‎ →‎Problem

4 March 2009

• 19:4019:40, 4 March 2009 diff hist +439‎ Talk:Gambler's fallacy ‎ →‎67 offers aid
• 15:4115:41, 4 March 2009 diff hist +984‎ Talk:Gambler's fallacy ‎ →‎Problem
• 14:5914:59, 4 March 2009 diff hist +778‎ Talk:Gambler's fallacy ‎ →‎67 offers aid
• 00:5000:50, 4 March 2009 diff hist +366‎ Talk:Gambler's fallacy ‎ →‎Problem
• 00:4100:41, 4 March 2009 diff hist +1,069‎ Talk:Gambler's fallacy ‎ →‎67 offers aid

3 March 2009

• 20:4120:41, 3 March 2009 diff hist +915‎ Talk:Gambler's fallacy ‎ →‎Ion is correct
• 14:3514:35, 3 March 2009 diff hist +272‎ Talk:Gambler's fallacy ‎ →‎Ion is correct
• 14:1514:15, 3 March 2009 diff hist +4,039‎ Talk:Gambler's fallacy ‎ →‎Ion is correct
• 13:0913:09, 3 March 2009 diff hist +1,203‎ Talk:Gambler's fallacy ‎ →‎attrition
• 03:3803:38, 3 March 2009 diff hist +738‎ Talk:Gambler's fallacy ‎ →‎attrition

2 March 2009

• 18:2418:24, 2 March 2009 diff hist +649‎ Talk:Monty Hall problem/Arguments ‎ →‎Paper by Morgan et al.
• 18:1218:12, 2 March 2009 diff hist +890‎ Talk:Monty Hall problem/Arguments ‎ →‎What is the sample space?
• 18:0418:04, 2 March 2009 diff hist +550‎ Talk:Gambler's fallacy ‎ →‎attrition
• 03:5903:59, 2 March 2009 diff hist +871‎ Talk:Gambler's fallacy ‎ →‎attrition
• 03:0703:07, 2 March 2009 diff hist +1,193‎ Talk:Monty Hall problem/Arguments ‎ →‎"Choice" vs. "Guess"
• 02:3402:34, 2 March 2009 diff hist +436‎ Talk:Gambler's fallacy ‎ →‎attrition
• 01:4701:47, 2 March 2009 diff hist +400‎ Talk:Gambler's fallacy ‎ →‎Sample space size is the key
• 01:4101:41, 2 March 2009 diff hist +120‎ Talk:Gambler's fallacy ‎ →‎Sample space size is the key
• 01:4001:40, 2 March 2009 diff hist +486‎ Talk:Gambler's fallacy ‎ →‎Sample space size is the key
• 00:3600:36, 2 March 2009 diff hist +684‎ Talk:Gambler's fallacy ‎ →‎Sample space size is the key

1 March 2009

• 23:4523:45, 1 March 2009 diff hist +121‎ Talk:Gambler's fallacy ‎ →‎Sample space size is the key
• 23:4423:44, 1 March 2009 diff hist +2,177‎ Talk:Gambler's fallacy ‎ →‎Sample space size is the key