User contributions for 66.167.204.242

21 April 2014

• 08:1508:15, 21 April 2014 diff hist +52‎ Spectral density ‎ de-emphasised the measure~~~~

20 April 2014

• 08:1108:11, 20 April 2014 diff hist +397‎ N Talk:Limit in mean ‎ This redirect is not a good idea.
• 07:5307:53, 20 April 2014 diff hist +47‎ Spectral density ‎ →‎Motivating example: better to keep repeating the word "average"~~~~
• 07:4507:45, 20 April 2014 diff hist 0‎ Spectral density ‎ →‎Motivating example: Change F to S for consistency with the Introduction and elsewhere~~~~
• 04:4104:41, 20 April 2014 diff hist +59‎ Spectral density ‎ more emphasis put on the function S
• 03:5103:51, 20 April 2014 diff hist −11‎ Spectral density ‎ reference formatting error~~~~
• 01:5901:59, 20 April 2014 diff hist +424‎ Spectral density ‎ →‎Motivating example: preview of relation to the general case added~~~~
• 01:4901:49, 20 April 2014 diff hist +137‎ Spectral density ‎No edit summary
• 01:4601:46, 20 April 2014 diff hist +202‎ Spectral density ‎ formatting error~~~~
• 01:3901:39, 20 April 2014 diff hist +2,805‎ Spectral density ‎ The existing introduction was biased, and did not even state briefly what the spectral density was, except for saying it was a positive function

19 April 2014

• 18:3218:32, 19 April 2014 diff hist +222‎ Spectral density ‎ the terminology is not completely standardised.~~~~
• 18:1918:19, 19 April 2014 diff hist +582‎ Spectral density ‎ →‎Preliminary conventions on notations for time series: alert to variations in the terminology used in the literature~~~~
• 18:1018:10, 19 April 2014 diff hist +1,412‎ Talk:Spectral power distribution ‎ →‎Title and "not to be confused with": new section
• 18:0418:04, 19 April 2014 diff hist +510‎ Spectral power distribution ‎ An almost identical term is used in different fields for a different concept (although a related one).~~~~

18 April 2014

• 18:0918:09, 18 April 2014 diff hist −3,414‎ Talk:Spectral power distribution ‎ Undid revision 604768758 by 66.167.204.242 (talk) sorry, put this on wrong page~~~~
• 18:0118:01, 18 April 2014 diff hist +520‎ Talk:Spectral density ‎ →‎Spectral intensity: Schuster's use of "intensity"~~~~
• 17:5817:58, 18 April 2014 diff hist −73‎ Talk:Spectral density ‎ my formatting error~~~~
• 17:5617:56, 18 April 2014 diff hist +1,676‎ Talk:Spectral density ‎ →‎Beware of internet sources and non-famous textbooks on this topic: examples that may have influenced some of the editors of this section in making their mistakes~~~~
• 17:5317:53, 18 April 2014 diff hist +1,811‎ Talk:Spectral density ‎ →‎Beware of internet sources and non-famous textbooks on this topic: new section
• 17:4817:48, 18 April 2014 diff hist +3,414‎ Talk:Spectral power distribution ‎ →‎Beware of internet sources and non-famous textbooks on this topic: new section
• 17:1717:17, 18 April 2014 diff hist −12‎ Spectral power distribution ‎ →‎Source SPD and Matter: still capitalised since not a unit
• 17:1017:10, 18 April 2014 diff hist +407‎ Talk:Spectral power distribution ‎ →‎Not technical enough for me ...: comment
• 07:4407:44, 18 April 2014 diff hist +1,132‎ Talk:Spectral density ‎ pointing out the nonsensical definition that has been offered~~~~
• 07:3007:30, 18 April 2014 diff hist 0‎ Spectral density ‎ →‎Related concepts: grammar
• 07:1307:13, 18 April 2014 diff hist +1,479‎ Talk:Spectral density ‎ Bad choice of title
• 07:0407:04, 18 April 2014 diff hist +576‎ N Talk:Power spectrum ‎ This term is more basic than that to which it redirects.
• 06:5906:59, 18 April 2014 diff hist −22‎ Spectral density ‎ →‎Explanation
• 06:5306:53, 18 April 2014 diff hist +1,281‎ N User talk:Mct mht/Wide-sense stationary time series ‎ comment current
• 06:4406:44, 18 April 2014 diff hist +433‎ Talk:Spectral density ‎ →‎Definition: objection to the clean, abstract, mathematical route to the definition of the power spectrum
• 06:3506:35, 18 April 2014 diff hist +784‎ Talk:Spectral density ‎ →‎notational consistency
• 06:2706:27, 18 April 2014 diff hist +733‎ Talk:Spectral density ‎ →‎terminology, scaling
• 06:2006:20, 18 April 2014 diff hist +3,367‎ Talk:Spectral density ‎ →‎Recent changes that confuse power and energy spectral density: addressing some of your valid points