User contributions for 66.101.59.248

16 February 2006

• 17:0417:04, 16 February 2006 diff hist +122‎ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Verbungula ‎ →‎[[Verbungula]]

13 February 2006

• 18:0618:06, 13 February 2006 diff hist −6,282‎ User talk:66.101.59.248 ‎No edit summary
• 17:5117:51, 13 February 2006 diff hist +1,045‎ User talk:66.101.59.248 ‎No edit summary
• 17:4117:41, 13 February 2006 diff hist +911‎ User talk:66.101.59.248 ‎No edit summary

12 February 2006

• 17:0317:03, 12 February 2006 diff hist +239‎ User talk:66.101.59.248 ‎No edit summary
• 17:0117:01, 12 February 2006 diff hist +330‎ User talk:66.101.59.248 ‎No edit summary
• 16:5816:58, 12 February 2006 diff hist +1,087‎ User talk:66.101.59.248 ‎No edit summary
• 12:0012:00, 12 February 2006 diff hist +151‎ User talk:66.101.59.248 ‎No edit summary
• 02:5602:56, 12 February 2006 diff hist +948‎ User talk:66.101.59.248 ‎No edit summary

11 February 2006

• 19:4619:46, 11 February 2006 diff hist −13,877‎ Online creation ‎ rv I think this article is more concise. Go to the talk page and tell us why you think all of the docs from all of these editors should be redudantly cited and included in the article.
• 19:4019:40, 11 February 2006 diff hist +378‎ Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring ‎ →‎[[User:Netoholic]]
• 19:3319:33, 11 February 2006 diff hist −13,877‎ Online creation ‎ rv I am not Locke, but from what I've read, this article is more concise
• 19:0719:07, 11 February 2006 diff hist −2‎ Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser ‎ →‎{{user|jlambert 9)) & {{user|Ehheh}} & {{user|Atari2600tim}}
• 19:0619:06, 11 February 2006 diff hist +271‎ Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser ‎ →‎{{user|Burman 9}} & {{user|Simp123457}}
• 19:0019:00, 11 February 2006 diff hist −13,877‎ Online creation ‎ rv Locke's edits are fine