User contributions for 50.81.209.157

For 50.81.209.157 talk block log logs filter log
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

9 May 2024

28 April 2024

25 April 2024

24 April 2024

21 April 2024

19 April 2024

15 April 2024

1 April 2024

31 March 2024

  • 17:3917:39, 31 March 2024 diff hist −17 WovenhandNPoV—what is unsettling for one is not necessarily for another, and whether Edwards’s approach to Christianity is “atypical” is very much a matter of opinion based on an assumption about what others privately believe. current

28 March 2024

  • 18:4418:44, 28 March 2024 diff hist −1,040 Andrew McFarlandThis article was replete with outright commentary and made such a point of using loaded language that it started mixing idioms (“a glaring lens” instead of “a glaring light”) the better to do so. Frankly, it read like a hagiography of Packard. I’ve returned us to NPoV so readers won’t be put off of the article entirely. current

26 March 2024

29 February 2024

7 February 2024

2 February 2024

31 January 2024

19 January 2024

  • 08:3408:34, 19 January 2024 diff hist +26 Arcane (TV series)More accurate—Jinx doesn’t just fire the gemstone at (and potentially miss) the council, she does in fact succeed in firing the gemstone into the council chamber as the council meets there. Tag: Reverted

18 January 2024

23 December 2023

20 December 2023

9 December 2023

18 November 2023

26 October 2023

2 October 2023

16 August 2023

15 August 2023

7 August 2023

29 July 2023

28 July 2023

6 July 2023

5 July 2023

4 July 2023

3 July 2023

23 June 2023

23 May 2023

20 May 2023

  • 05:2805:28, 20 May 2023 diff hist −24 Cotton ginConsistent with widespread use, including with numerous Wikipedia articles that, while acknowledging the potential for other more awkward phrasings, sensibly use words such as “lepers” rather than phrases such as “people who suffer from leprosy”, “people who have leprosy”, “people affected with leprosy”, etc. In any case “enslaved labor” isn’t grammatical: labor itself can’t be enslaved.

28 April 2023

27 April 2023

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)