Jump to content

User contributions for 5.198.25.14

Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽

6 May 2023

31 May 2021

  • 15:0515:05, 31 May 2021 diff hist +145 Gospel of ThomasI have again removed the non-canknical attribution as Wikipedia should be balanced and informative and not limit itself to a religious description of content from one perspective.. screenshotting each time it is replaced with the byassed view again Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • 08:1208:12, 31 May 2021 diff hist +176 Gospel of ThomasI have again removed non-canonical attribution to the Gospel as this is making the article a Christian as opposed to scholarly focused source. Otherwise every text that wiki includes not in the Bible would require this association. This is supposed to be a fact based checkable information source not a propaganda device. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • 08:0208:02, 31 May 2021 diff hist −34 Parable of the TaresThe attribution of apocryphal to the Gospel of Thomas implies a lesser status to the text and is used by Christian's for books not included in the Bible. The test stands alone by itself without this. Tags: Manual revert Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

30 May 2021

  • 20:4220:42, 30 May 2021 diff hist −4 Gospel of ThomasI've removed the unnecessary hyperlink Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • 20:4020:40, 30 May 2021 diff hist +13 Gospel of ThomasThe use of the term non-canonical has been replaced as it implies a lesser status to the text in comparison to Biblical books. As a stand alone text it does not need this and the term would only be realistically used by Christians and not scholars or general readers. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • 18:5218:52, 30 May 2021 diff hist +109 Gospel of ThomasI have removed and alternated wording that implies the Gospel of Thomas is 'non canonical or extra Biblical as this assumes some sort of lower status. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • 18:1718:17, 30 May 2021 diff hist −34 Parable of the TaresI have removed the apocryphal connection to the Gospel of Thomas as it implies it is a lesser text of some sort (usually in comparison to a biblical one) as opposed to it being a historical source material that is used independently for religious purposes too. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

19 March 2020

20 July 2017