User contributions for 24.207.125.44

29 May 2013

• 14:4214:42, 29 May 2013 diff hist −23‎ Energy Catalyzer ‎ Not true. Nowhere does he claim in his blog post that the testers are not independent just not competent. Please read the article cited before editing Wikipedia.
• 14:2214:22, 29 May 2013 diff hist +541‎ Talk:Energy Catalyzer ‎ →‎Heads-up : 3rd party report preprint -- pending a RS
• 13:3313:33, 29 May 2013 diff hist +113‎ Talk:Energy Catalyzer ‎ →‎Heads-up : 3rd party report preprint -- pending a RS
• 13:3313:33, 29 May 2013 diff hist +224‎ Talk:Energy Catalyzer ‎ →‎Heads-up : 3rd party report preprint -- pending a RS
• 13:3013:30, 29 May 2013 diff hist +15‎ Talk:Energy Catalyzer ‎ →‎Heads-up : 3rd party report preprint -- pending a RS
• 13:2913:29, 29 May 2013 diff hist +1,186‎ Talk:Energy Catalyzer ‎ →‎Heads-up : 3rd party report preprint -- pending a RS
• 08:3908:39, 29 May 2013 diff hist −416‎ Energy Catalyzer ‎ Reactant measurement, while interesting from a science p.o.v., is irrelevant from a power density p.o.v.. The real concern was how the power was being fed into the device.
• 08:1508:15, 29 May 2013 diff hist −23‎ Energy Catalyzer ‎ "supposedly independent" doesn't add anything.

15 February 2013

• 18:3618:36, 15 February 2013 diff hist −4‎ Eric Howlett ‎No edit summary
• 06:1306:13, 15 February 2013 diff hist +296‎ Escape velocity ‎ Undid revision 538359513 by 24.207.125.44 (talk)
• 06:1006:10, 15 February 2013 diff hist −296‎ Escape velocity ‎ It's not a misnomer. The statement is mathematically incorrect. Direction is critical. If you shoot something straight up it will require less velocity than if you shoot something towards the horizon.