User contributions for 222.153.250.135

26 January 2018

• 09:3409:34, 26 January 2018 diff hist +299 Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard →Tennys Sandgren: length and detail
• 06:4906:49, 26 January 2018 diff hist +2 Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard →Tennys Sandgren: I need to use preview
• 06:4806:48, 26 January 2018 diff hist +17 Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard →Tennys Sandgren: ok this is the right way to do it appaerently
• 06:4706:47, 26 January 2018 diff hist +4 Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard →Tennys Sandgren: wl header
• 06:4706:47, 26 January 2018 diff hist +405 Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard →Tennys Sandgren: new section
• 06:4106:41, 26 January 2018 diff hist +413 Talk:Tennys Sandgren →"Personal" sub-section of article: undue and blp

24 January 2018

• 06:3306:33, 24 January 2018 diff hist +434 Talk:Tennys Sandgren →"Personal" sub-section of article: undue
• 06:2706:27, 24 January 2018 diff hist 0 Tennys Sandgren →Twitter controversy: Twitter is capitalized
• 06:2506:25, 24 January 2018 diff hist +8 Tennys Sandgren →Personal life: more specific
• 06:2506:25, 24 January 2018 diff hist −314 Tennys Sandgren →2018: Australian Open quarterfinal: covered in personal, not needed here Tag: references removed
• 06:1806:18, 24 January 2018 diff hist +16 CoCo Vandeweghe →2018: ce
• 05:0005:00, 24 January 2018 diff hist −9 Tennys Sandgren →Controversy: remove pov
• 04:1504:15, 24 January 2018 diff hist +45 CoCo Vandeweghe →2018: wl
• 04:1404:14, 24 January 2018 diff hist +939 CoCo Vandeweghe →Professional career: ok... this is doing it right. Just the facts, and reflect the source. If the incident reflects a pattern, then that must be sourced.
• 03:4503:45, 24 January 2018 diff hist +5 Tennys Sandgren personal and controversy stuff should be at the end, main emphasis should be on his tennis
• 03:3903:39, 24 January 2018 diff hist −4 Tennys Sandgren MOS:INFOBOXFLAG is very clear about this and WP:TENNIS does not exist in a bubble where the MOS does not apply
• 03:3703:37, 24 January 2018 diff hist +2 Tennys Sandgren don't agree with this move, it's WP:UNDUE to give "Controversy" a whole section
• 03:3503:35, 24 January 2018 diff hist +53 Tennys Sandgren →Controversy: note that tweets have been deleted

22 January 2018

• 00:0200:02, 22 January 2018 diff hist −305 List of chess gambits revert, it's already under Reti Opening

21 January 2018

• 04:5204:52, 21 January 2018 diff hist −589 CoCo Vandeweghe Undid revision 821543852 by Glo145 (talk) I gave reasons for the deletion, also explained on talk page. Don't just restore it without addressing concerns Tag: Undo

20 January 2018

• 08:4708:47, 20 January 2018 diff hist +502 Talk:CoCo Vandeweghe →Recent incident: new section
• 08:3708:37, 20 January 2018 diff hist −589 CoCo Vandeweghe →Playing style: isn't Daily Mail "banned" as a source? In any case the text does not reflect the ESPN source, which refers only to a single very recent incident, not the implied past pattern of behaviour
• 07:5607:56, 20 January 2018 diff hist −425 CoCo Vandeweghe →Professional career: remove whole section per WP:BLP. Restore it when you have a source.

17 January 2018

• 11:0711:07, 17 January 2018 diff hist +324 Glossary of chess →C: country move

13 January 2018

• 22:2522:25, 13 January 2018 diff hist +323 Wikipedia:Requests for page protection →Current requests for increase in protection level: Craig McLachlan
• 21:5921:59, 13 January 2018 diff hist +270 User talk:Gareth Griffith-Jones →Just because I'm an IP....: new section
• 10:0910:09, 13 January 2018 diff hist +294 First-move advantage in chess →Solving chess: note on shannon's calculation
• 09:5509:55, 13 January 2018 diff hist +17 First-move advantage in chess →Solving chess: move explanation of "solved" to first para

12 January 2018

• 12:2312:23, 12 January 2018 diff hist +20 Craig McLachlan Undid revision 819987673 by 120.18.79.113 (talk) stop it. this is the wrong approach. discuss any changes to the lead on the talk page. Tag: Undo
• 10:1610:16, 12 January 2018 diff hist +334 User talk:Outdooradventurer121 →Stop the edit warring on the Craig McLachlan article: new section

11 January 2018

• 08:5808:58, 11 January 2018 diff hist +1 First-move advantage in chess →Quotations: couldn't get author-link to work so just wikilinking it
• 08:5608:56, 11 January 2018 diff hist −29 First-move advantage in chess →Quotations: omit publication place (looks a bit odd)
• 08:5308:53, 11 January 2018 diff hist +301 First-move advantage in chess →Quotations: cool Tal quote

10 January 2018

• 22:5722:57, 10 January 2018 diff hist +129 User talk:JayBeeEll →Thx: +1
• 22:0822:08, 10 January 2018 diff hist −15 Solving chess →Predictions on when/if chess will be solved: Shannon did underestimate the speed of future processors, but that only knocks a few zeros off his 10^90 guesstimate
• 21:4721:47, 10 January 2018 diff hist −16 First-move advantage in chess →Solving chess: rem duplicat link
• 21:4121:41, 10 January 2018 diff hist +230 First-move advantage in chess →Solving chess: tldr summary
• 21:3721:37, 10 January 2018 diff hist +9 First-move advantage in chess →Solving chess: scientific -> computer science
• 21:3521:35, 10 January 2018 diff hist −3 First-move advantage in chess →Solving chess: rejig, ce
• 21:3121:31, 10 January 2018 diff hist −1 First-move advantage in chess →Solving chess: move sentence
• 21:3021:30, 10 January 2018 diff hist −1,250 First-move advantage in chess →Solving chess: summarize and paraphrase rather than give lengthy block quote, interested readers can always check the source
• 21:2221:22, 10 January 2018 diff hist +32 First-move advantage in chess →Solving chess: ce
• 21:2121:21, 10 January 2018 diff hist 0 First-move advantage in chess →Solving chess: capitalize
• 21:2021:20, 10 January 2018 diff hist −315 First-move advantage in chess →Solving chess: slim down and de-emphasize this section (WP:UNDUE). Rowson's speculation is simply ill-informed Tag: references removed
• 21:1921:19, 10 January 2018 diff hist −32 First-move advantage in chess Undid revision 819706122 by Jasper Deng (talk) no, solving chess is *not* the main subject of the article, there is a separate article for that Tag: Undo
• 21:1221:12, 10 January 2018 diff hist −32 First-move advantage in chess not a game theory article, it focuses on the chessiverse
• 20:1320:13, 10 January 2018 diff hist +154 Wikipedia:Closure requests →Other types of closing requests: withdrawn following SPI
• 12:3912:39, 10 January 2018 diff hist +188 Talk:First-move advantage in chess →Yet another disruptive edit: template
• 10:3410:34, 10 January 2018 diff hist +656 Talk:First-move advantage in chess →Yet another disruptive edit: unfair....
• 10:2610:26, 10 January 2018 diff hist +5 Craig McLachlan →Sexual harassment allegations: ce