User contributions for 222.152.171.61

3 February 2010

• 08:4908:49, 3 February 2010 diff hist −22‎ Jodie Foster ‎ Use style for other bios
• 08:4208:42, 3 February 2010 diff hist +669‎ User talk:222.152.171.61 ‎ →‎Welcome: are you here just as a policeman, or to help build an encyclopedia
• 01:5801:58, 3 February 2010 diff hist −22‎ Jodie Foster ‎ use name she is known by , and title of this article
• 00:3100:31, 3 February 2010 diff hist −47‎ Nellie Bly ‎ Of course she did
• 00:2300:23, 3 February 2010 diff hist −70‎ Match of the Century (1953 England v Hungary football match) ‎ Remove unreferenced OR. Many games could fit the same description, so meaningless really.

2 February 2010

• 20:0920:09, 2 February 2010 diff hist +1,093‎ User talk:Boing! said Zebedee ‎ No, I don't mind
• 20:0620:06, 2 February 2010 diff hist −13‎ Nellie Bly ‎ The article is Nellie Bly, and she was universally known as Nellie Bly.
• 19:5619:56, 2 February 2010 diff hist +924‎ User talk:222.152.171.61 ‎ →‎Welcome
• 05:3705:37, 2 February 2010 diff hist −100‎ Nellie Bly ‎ →‎Mentions of her: So what? She is not the subject of this article. Do a disamb page if you need to add such silliness
• 05:3505:35, 2 February 2010 diff hist −256‎ Nellie Bly ‎ →‎Mentions of her: So what. Totally irrelevant. My neighbours cat is called Nellie (shock horror). Should that be included?
• 05:3405:34, 2 February 2010 diff hist −174‎ Nellie Bly ‎ →‎Mentions of her: So what. Totally irrelevant
• 05:3305:33, 2 February 2010 diff hist −416‎ Nellie Bly ‎ Whatever happened to wikipedia needing references

1 February 2010

• 08:3008:30, 1 February 2010 diff hist −115‎ Royal New Zealand Navy ‎ Undid revision 341221840 by Gadfium (talk) Unreferenced, original research. Qualify with "known"

31 January 2010

• 22:3722:37, 31 January 2010 diff hist +318‎ Talk:Throttle ‎ →‎removed Computing section
• 21:3921:39, 31 January 2010 diff hist −121‎ Royal New Zealand Navy ‎ →‎Pre-World War I: hardly
• 21:3121:31, 31 January 2010 diff hist +27‎ Talk:Steorn ‎ →‎The latest e-mail -- "McCarthy will demonstrate and prove that Orbo is an overunity technology"

30 January 2010

• 23:3923:39, 30 January 2010 diff hist +125‎ User talk:Maury Markowitz ‎ →‎The Wikipedia Signpost: 25 January 2010
• 22:5522:55, 30 January 2010 diff hist +405‎ Talk:Steorn ‎ →‎The latest e-mail -- "McCarthy will demonstrate and prove that Orbo is an overunity technology"
• 22:3622:36, 30 January 2010 diff hist +692‎ Talk:Steorn ‎ Shouldn't we mention they are promising to prove the overunity technology?
• 22:1622:16, 30 January 2010 diff hist +424‎ Talk:Torpedo ‎ spar torpedo

28 January 2010

• 08:4508:45, 28 January 2010 diff hist −63‎ De Havilland Vampire ‎ less weaselly

26 January 2010

• 02:4702:47, 26 January 2010 diff hist +8‎ 1931 Hawke's Bay earthquake ‎ →‎Tectonic setting: local usage
• 02:4602:46, 26 January 2010 diff hist −3‎ 1931 Hawke's Bay earthquake ‎No edit summary

25 January 2010

• 23:3123:31, 25 January 2010 diff hist −10‎ Bionicle ‎ →‎Māori language controversy: remove POV

23 January 2010

• 22:5122:51, 23 January 2010 diff hist +115‎ Napier (New Zealand electorate) ‎ →‎Members of Parliament for Napier: add buchanan
• 21:4321:43, 23 January 2010 diff hist −4‎ ADE 651 ‎ spacing fix
• 21:4321:43, 23 January 2010 diff hist +382‎ ADE 651 ‎ surely we have to keep up with developments

22 January 2010

• 21:2521:25, 22 January 2010 diff hist −36‎ Search for extraterrestrial intelligence ‎ →‎Criticism: who writes these ads

21 January 2010

• 20:5720:57, 21 January 2010 diff hist −5‎ Reason (magazine) ‎No edit summary

17 January 2010

• 20:3920:39, 17 January 2010 diff hist +92‎ Codd ‎ add olde hiram, he of olde bottle fame

15 January 2010

• 07:5407:54, 15 January 2010 diff hist −24‎ Wikipedia:New Zealand Wikipedians' notice board ‎ →‎Religion graph: Fix racism. If people are xtian then they are xtian regardless of ethnicity

12 January 2010

• 00:3000:30, 12 January 2010 diff hist −201‎ Nick Smith (New Zealand politician) ‎ confused with who? Not prominent, even in Wellywood, and the ref did not support the statement anyway