User contributions for 220.233.29.226

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

08:2108:21, 29 July 2012 diff hist −288‎ Race and intelligence ‎ Undid revision 504714950 by Dgw (talk) Content removed due to having no references, burden of proof on editors who re-insert it.
06:5806:58, 29 July 2012 diff hist −288‎ Race and intelligence ‎ it all comes back to WP:Burden - edit warring is no substitute for references for statements likely to be challenged.
04:2704:27, 29 July 2012 diff hist −288‎ Race and intelligence ‎ WP:Leadcite is not a red link. The statement starts out as meaningless and finishes up as wrong. Meat puppets are using 3RR to keep garbage in articles contrary to explicit policy

08:0008:00, 28 July 2012 diff hist −288‎ Race and intelligence ‎ WP:Leadcite The statement is factually incorrect - it is possible to have studies about difference in racial intelligence without referencing all of those fields.
03:2503:25, 28 July 2012 diff hist −288‎ Race and intelligence ‎ Undid revision 504533197 by AndyTheGrump (talk) Thanks for your opinion, but statement is unreferenced. WP:Burden
02:5802:58, 28 July 2012 diff hist −288‎ Race and intelligence ‎ Unreferenced statements. The first part is true - but irrelevant (no universal definitions) the second part is likely false but also irrelevant. In any case wp:burden.
02:5502:55, 28 July 2012 diff hist −44‎ Jealousy ‎ Unreferenced and dubious statement removed

05:1005:10, 15 July 2012 diff hist −288‎ Race and intelligence ‎ Unreferenced and dubious statement removed

05:5605:56, 22 May 2012 diff hist +1‎ Muggsy Bogues ‎ →‎Life after the NBA: The metric system shouldn't be used for heights, but IF you do insist on using that silly system at least convert with some accuracy.

20:3320:33, 13 November 2011 diff hist −4‎ Physical attractiveness ‎ →‎Height and erect posture: How 90% of wikipedia users are so terrible at mathematics to consistently get metric/imperial conversions wrong (or need to misuse a "convert" function) is beyond me.

13:0413:04, 15 October 2011 diff hist −3‎ Migration Period ‎ Trying to remove minority language usage i.e. "common era" etc for more widespread and accurate terms. Why not rename the days of the week to remove religious origins and obscure what you are talking about?

11:1811:18, 22 July 2011 diff hist +827‎ User talk:Just Step Sideways ‎ →‎Detrimental: new section
11:0811:08, 22 July 2011 diff hist +15,294‎ Race and crime ‎ No evidence of consensus to "stubify" which really means "no consensus to delete". Wikipedia isn't a democracy, and there's no mandate to delete, and that's plain loopy.

09:0709:07, 21 July 2011 diff hist −245‎ Indigenous Australians and crime ‎ Paraphrasing a book, rather than citing a study doesn't deserve the prominence this entry has been given.
09:0509:05, 21 July 2011 diff hist +15,294‎ Race and crime ‎ Transperent attempt to censor article - reintroducing information. Be DISCRIMINATING in what information is removed not BIASED

20:1820:18, 31 March 2011 diff hist −1,896‎ Passive smoking ‎ →‎Controversy over harm: Unreferenced ad hom section. The references don't support the opinions expressed in the paragraph. Find some real controversial studies about second hand smoke. Is it worse than candle smoke? Tag: section blanking