User contributions for 189.8.107.196
For 189.8.107.196 talk block log logs filter log
24 January 2015
- 19:4319:43, 24 January 2015 diff hist +1,063 Talk:Pope Joan No edit summary
- 19:3619:36, 24 January 2015 diff hist +754 Pope Joan Undid revision 643996855 by Dr.K. (talk) No reason has been given as to why the references were removed. This is censorship.
- 19:3419:34, 24 January 2015 diff hist +780 Talk:Pope Joan No edit summary
- 19:2619:26, 24 January 2015 diff hist +75 Pope Joan Undid revision 643995372 by Dr.K. (talk) I suggest you read the Talk page; there indeed ARE scholars who disagree with this consensus, and this is indeed what is under discussion at the Talk page now
- 19:2419:24, 24 January 2015 diff hist +679 Pope Joan To say that Joan's statue was removed "after protests" is clearly misleading, seemingly purporting that the people asked to have her removed. Added the fact that it was done by request of the Pope, and added 5 references to it
- 19:0919:09, 24 January 2015 diff hist +4 Pope Joan No edit summary
- 19:0919:09, 24 January 2015 diff hist +71 Pope Joan No edit summary
- 17:3717:37, 24 January 2015 diff hist −81 Pope Joan Undid revision 643973310 by 189.8.107.196 (talk)
- 17:3017:30, 24 January 2015 diff hist +654 Talk:Pope Joan No edit summary
- 17:2617:26, 24 January 2015 diff hist +6 Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard →Summary of dispute by
- 17:2617:26, 24 January 2015 diff hist +6 Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard →Talk:Pope Joan
- 17:2517:25, 24 January 2015 diff hist +5,266 Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard →Talk:Pope Joan: new section
- 16:3616:36, 24 January 2015 diff hist −286 Pope Joan (1972 film) Undid revision 643900817 by Binksternet (talk) It doesn't belong in here. If you insist on adding this non-neutral observation, I will challenge the article's neutrality.
- 16:3216:32, 24 January 2015 diff hist +250 Talk:Pope Joan No edit summary
- 16:2616:26, 24 January 2015 diff hist +81 Pope Joan Undid revision 643864389 by (talk), who removed Pope Joan's movie poster alledging it wasn't fair use. I have looked extensively and couldn't find any sources backing your claim that movie posters can only be used in the movie art
- 16:1116:11, 24 January 2015 diff hist +1,329 Talk:Pope Joan No edit summary
- 16:0116:01, 24 January 2015 diff hist −3,522 User talk:189.8.107.196 ←Replaced content with 'Thanks! I will read that! ~~~~ I replied [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Flyer22&diff=643934021&oldid=643884644#Message_from_189.8.1...'
23 January 2015
- 23:3423:34, 23 January 2015 diff hist +679 Talk:Pope Joan →Scholarly consensus
- 23:2223:22, 23 January 2015 diff hist +749 User talk:Binksternet No edit summary
- 23:2023:20, 23 January 2015 diff hist +745 User talk:Maurice Carbonaro No edit summary
- 22:4822:48, 23 January 2015 diff hist +673 Talk:Pope Joan No edit summary
- 19:1019:10, 23 January 2015 diff hist +81 Pope Joan →In fiction
- 18:0618:06, 23 January 2015 diff hist +27 Pope Joan As of January 2015, the neutrality of this article is being disputed (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Pope_Joan ). According to Wikipedia's rules, this warning is in order and should not be removed until the dispute is solved.
- 17:5717:57, 23 January 2015 diff hist +2,010 Talk:Pope Joan →Scholarly consensus
- 15:5915:59, 23 January 2015 diff hist −119 Talk:Pope Joan →Scholarly consensus
- 15:5415:54, 23 January 2015 diff hist +2 Talk:Pope Joan →Scholarly consensus
- 15:5415:54, 23 January 2015 diff hist −5 Talk:Pope Joan →Scholarly consensus
- 15:5315:53, 23 January 2015 diff hist +146 Talk:Pope Joan →Scholarly consensus
- 15:5215:52, 23 January 2015 diff hist +1,578 Talk:Pope Joan →Scholarly consensus
- 14:3314:33, 23 January 2015 diff hist +56 Talk:Pope Joan →Scholarly consensus
- 14:1914:19, 23 January 2015 diff hist −164 Talk:Pope Joan →Scholarly consensus
- 14:1214:12, 23 January 2015 diff hist +985 Talk:Pope Joan →Scholarly consensus
- 13:5713:57, 23 January 2015 diff hist +505 Pope Joan Fine, let us discuss then the editions made in the 1st paragraph regarding "most scholars". But why had you removed this neutral paragraph, which states clearly it is one person's POV, from the critique section? That was clearly censorship and abuse
- 13:5013:50, 23 January 2015 diff hist +1,533 Talk:Pope Joan →Scholarly consensus
- 13:1913:19, 23 January 2015 diff hist +506 Pope Joan →Modern analysis and critique: Included British academic & former editor of The Catholic Herald Peter Stanford's conclusion who says that, due to evidences, he is "convinced that Pope Joan was an historical figure, though perhaps not all details are".
- 13:1113:11, 23 January 2015 diff hist +192 Pope Joan As provided in the link I ref'd, Peter Stanford, Henry Holt et al, on ""The Legend of Pope Joan", concluded that "Weighing all this evidence, I am convinced that Pope Joan was an historical figure, though perhaps not all the details about her are true"
- 03:1503:15, 23 January 2015 diff hist +59 Pope Joan No edit summary
- 03:1303:13, 23 January 2015 diff hist +11 Pope Joan Even if it was just one, "all but one" = "most", definitely. Definitely not = "all". But I guess "almost all" is equally correct, and will better satisfy the clear personal position of the editors of this article :)
- 03:0203:02, 23 January 2015 diff hist +144 Pope Joan Donna Cross, a novelist who spent seven years researching the time period, says the historical evidence is there. "I would say it's the weight of evidence -- over 500 chronicle accounts of her existence."/
- 02:3202:32, 23 January 2015 diff hist +85 Pope Joan Not every single scholar in the world agrees on that, so I have changed it from "scholars regard" to "most scholars regard", since I referred to at least one author who studied her for 7 years and says she believes the story
22 January 2015
- 21:0521:05, 22 January 2015 diff hist −15 Template:G20-Foreign No edit summary
- 21:0321:03, 22 January 2015 diff hist +193 Mauro Vieira No edit summary
- 21:0121:01, 22 January 2015 diff hist +1 Mauro Vieira No edit summary
- 21:0121:01, 22 January 2015 diff hist +18 Mauro Vieira No edit summary
- 20:5520:55, 22 January 2015 diff hist +90 Mauro Vieira No edit summary
- 20:3920:39, 22 January 2015 diff hist +16 Pope Joan ...Tried to make it even more impartial...
- 20:3720:37, 22 January 2015 diff hist +127 Pope Joan If you cannot prove that she didn't exist, you cannot blatantly say that she was definitely legendary or fictitious. I think the text now looks more unbiased.
- 20:3520:35, 22 January 2015 diff hist +23 Pope Joan No edit summary
- 20:2720:27, 22 January 2015 diff hist +40 Pope Joan No edit summary
- 20:2620:26, 22 January 2015 diff hist 0 Pope Joan No edit summary