User contributions for 187.17.57.15

15 June 2014

• 19:4119:41, 15 June 2014 diff hist +257‎ User talk:187.17.57.15 ‎ Just fuck off
• 16:5316:53, 15 June 2014 diff hist +257‎ User talk:187.17.57.15 ‎No edit summary
• 15:5715:57, 15 June 2014 diff hist +203‎ User talk:187.17.57.15 ‎No edit summary
• 15:4615:46, 15 June 2014 diff hist +222‎ User talk:187.17.57.15 ‎No edit summary
• 15:4515:45, 15 June 2014 diff hist +236‎ Talk:David Gilmour ‎No edit summary
• 15:4315:43, 15 June 2014 diff hist +339‎ Talk:David Gilmour ‎ Undid revision 613023972 by SummerPhD (talk)
• 15:4215:42, 15 June 2014 diff hist +2,826‎ Wikipedia talk:Ownership of content ‎ Undid revision 613023883 by SummerPhD (talk)
• 15:3615:36, 15 June 2014 diff hist +2,826‎ Wikipedia talk:Ownership of content ‎ Don't fucking remove my comments from talk pages. When I'm making the point that you're just being provocative and have no interest in constructive editing, it's immensely retarded to be provocative like that
• 15:3315:33, 15 June 2014 diff hist −35‎ CBC News Network ‎ Undid revision 613021889 by SummerPhD (talk) don't revert for no reason
• 15:3315:33, 15 June 2014 diff hist −35‎ BBC Canada ‎ Undid revision 613021904 by SummerPhD (talk) don't revert for no reason
• 15:3315:33, 15 June 2014 diff hist +339‎ Talk:David Gilmour ‎ unbelievably fucking rude to remove comments on talk pages
• 15:2515:25, 15 June 2014 diff hist −10‎ Lou Reed ‎ rm peacock words
• 15:0915:09, 15 June 2014 diff hist −167‎ Lisa Dean Ryan ‎ statements qualified with "perhaps" are not useful
• 15:0915:09, 15 June 2014 diff hist −35‎ CBC News Network ‎ Unexplained jargon, not mentioned in rest of article, therefore not useful in lead.
• 15:0715:07, 15 June 2014 diff hist −35‎ BBC Canada ‎ Undid revision 612842963 by Calidum (talk) explained perfectly well. the meaning is not explained, it's not mentioned anywhere in the rest of the article so it clearly cannot be useful in the lead.
• 14:5414:54, 15 June 2014 diff hist +339‎ Talk:David Gilmour ‎No edit summary