User contributions for 180.148.123.68
Appearance
For 180.148.123.68 talk block log logs filter log
2 February 2022
- 05:2105:21, 2 February 2022 diff hist +61 List of space opera media →Comics and manga: Added Schlock Mercenary Tag: Disambiguation links added
31 January 2022
- 05:1205:12, 31 January 2022 diff hist +860 Talk:Vision therapy →Request for Comment on legitimacy
30 January 2022
- 03:5803:58, 30 January 2022 diff hist +272 Talk:Vision therapy →Request for Comment on legitimacy: new section
- 03:3003:30, 30 January 2022 diff hist +194 User talk:180.148.123.68 →January 2022
- 01:1501:15, 30 January 2022 diff hist −6,354 Vision therapy Undid revision 1068686738 by Alexbrn (talk) Onus of justification is on you, actually. There are already several talk page topics expressing concern about non-neutrality. Tags: Undo Reverted Disambiguation links added
- 01:1101:11, 30 January 2022 diff hist +928 User talk:180.148.123.68 →January 2022
29 January 2022
- 20:1720:17, 29 January 2022 diff hist −6,354 Vision therapy Undid revision 1068330880 by Alexbrn (talk) Dear Mister Skeptic: Science works because the truth is testable, not because the weirdos have no platform. This article is, for better or for worse, describing many real medical treatments whose individual effectiveness has been controversial. Wikipedia is the first credible source for many people, on account of having multiple contributors. This is why neutrality and conciseness are important. Tags: Undo Reverted Disambiguation links added
27 January 2022
- 21:5921:59, 27 January 2022 diff hist −22 The Lightning Process Characterizing a semi-fringe school of psychotherapy as psuedoscience is non-neutral. This is how we get people thinking Freudian psychology is even slightly up to date. Tag: Reverted
- 21:0321:03, 27 January 2022 diff hist −6,354 Vision therapy Undid revision 1068208227 by Alexbrn (talk) This doesn't belong in alternative medicine - the list of medical scams is and should be different from the list of actual medicines, and while some vision therapy is certainly scamful, characterizing all of it that way is *wrong*. Tags: Undo Reverted Disambiguation links added
- 03:1003:10, 27 January 2022 diff hist −6,322 Vision therapy Undid revision 1067524806 by Natureium (talk) The sources removed were sources for the 'THIS IS ALL BUNK ALL OF IT EVEN THE STUFF THAT IS WELL KNOWN NOT TO BE' editorialization, which I removed on account of it violates the Neutral Point of View. Tags: Undo Reverted Disambiguation links added
- 03:0503:05, 27 January 2022 diff hist −32 Vision therapy Undid revision 1067525114 by Natureium (talk) While it's a step in the right direction, this single line is getting in the way of my reverting a major bad-edit.. Tags: Undo Reverted
26 January 2022
- 08:0208:02, 26 January 2022 diff hist +10 Grave field The fact that ancient cemeteries may have used, say, wooden markers which have long since rotted away, does not mean that they necessarily never had above-ground markers!
25 January 2022
- 01:4401:44, 25 January 2022 diff hist −39 Qi Direct observation does seem to have been done repeatedly in historical China! The fact that they were probably wrong doesn't mean we get to take every shot at them we can.
23 January 2022
- 21:4121:41, 23 January 2022 diff hist +258 Talk:American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus →This doesn't seem to meet notability guidelines: new section
- 21:2621:26, 23 January 2022 diff hist +427 Talk:Vision therapy →Article Bias, Fringe theories, insufficient citations of papers
- 21:2121:21, 23 January 2022 diff hist −6,322 Vision therapy Stripped out a bunch of exceedingly non-neutral 'this is unscientific' language, condensed the sections a lot (it's clear that the optometrist-people who are trying to defend this have been making do with linking to other articles, and in fairness to them those other articles are much more useful than a list of people who've administrated an optometric college, like the articles that the people who've been working hard to frame vision therapy as Entirely Unscientific Woo Woo have been making). Tags: Reverted Visual edit Disambiguation links added
- 20:4720:47, 23 January 2022 diff hist +1 User talk:Bon courage →Non-neutrality in the Vision Therapy article is a known problem
- 20:4720:47, 23 January 2022 diff hist +154 User talk:Bon courage →Non-neutrality in the Vision Therapy article is a known problem
- 20:4220:42, 23 January 2022 diff hist +3 User talk:Bon courage →Non-neutrality in the Vision Therapy article is a known problem
- 20:4220:42, 23 January 2022 diff hist +137 User talk:Bon courage →Non-neutrality in the Vision Therapy article is a known problem
- 20:4120:41, 23 January 2022 diff hist +107 User talk:Bon courage →Non-neutrality in the Vision Therapy article is a known problem
- 20:3420:34, 23 January 2022 diff hist +21 User talk:Bon courage →Non-neutrality in the Vision Therapy article is a known problem
- 20:3420:34, 23 January 2022 diff hist +258 User talk:Bon courage →Non-neutrality in the Vision Therapy article is a known problem: new section
- 20:2920:29, 23 January 2022 diff hist −18 Vision therapy →Scope and Conceptual Basis Tag: Reverted
- 20:2820:28, 23 January 2022 diff hist +6 Vision therapy →Scope and Conceptual Basis Tag: Reverted
- 20:2520:25, 23 January 2022 diff hist −4,073 Vision therapy Undid revision 1067191365 by Alexbrn (talk) Neutral point of view is actually more important than citing sneer pieces! Tags: Undo Reverted Disambiguation links added
22 January 2022
- 01:1101:11, 22 January 2022 diff hist −4,072 Vision therapy This page may need semi-protection or something similar; it is *very clearly* falling prey to a proxy war between The People Who Don't Trust Pharmaceuticals and The People Who Don't Trust New-Age Quacks, with the legitimate practitioners (however rare they may be) getting caught in the crossfire. Tags: Reverted Visual edit: Switched Disambiguation links added
17 January 2022
- 04:0004:00, 17 January 2022 diff hist +5 Radioluminescence No edit summary