User contributions for 176.88.165.232
Appearance
Results for 176.88.165.232 talk block log logs global block log filter log
12 November 2024
- 21:3221:32, 12 November 2024 diff hist +463 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:AirshipJungleman29 reported by User:176.88.165.232 (Result: declined): Reply Tag: Reply
- 21:3021:30, 12 November 2024 diff hist +316 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:AirshipJungleman29 reported by User:176.88.165.232 (Result: declined): Reply Tag: Reply
- 21:1021:10, 12 November 2024 diff hist +513 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:AirshipJungleman29 reported by User:176.88.165.232 (Result: declined): Reply Tag: Reply
- 21:0921:09, 12 November 2024 diff hist +532 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:AirshipJungleman29 reported by User:176.88.165.232 (Result: declined): Reply Tag: Reply
- 20:4720:47, 12 November 2024 diff hist +598 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →[[User:AirshipJungleman29>]] reported by User:176.88.165.232 (Result: ): Reply Tag: Reply
- 20:4220:42, 12 November 2024 diff hist −39 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User: reported by User:176.88.165.232 (Result: )
- 20:2920:29, 12 November 2024 diff hist +1,504 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User: reported by User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}} (Result: ): new section
- 20:2220:22, 12 November 2024 diff hist +558 User talk:AirshipJungleman29 →I am reporting you: new section Tags: Reverted New topic
10 November 2024
- 18:2018:20, 10 November 2024 diff hist +490 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:176.88.165.232 reported by User:HistoryofIran (Result: ): Reply Tag: Reply
- 18:0718:07, 10 November 2024 diff hist +457 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:176.88.165.232 reported by User:HistoryofIran (Result: )
- 17:4717:47, 10 November 2024 diff hist +1,239 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User: AirshipJungleman29 reported by User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}} (Result: ): new section
- 17:4217:42, 10 November 2024 diff hist −7 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring Minor: Amended coding
- 17:4017:40, 10 November 2024 diff hist +1,123 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User: reported by User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}} (Result: ): new section
- 17:3217:32, 10 November 2024 diff hist +558 User talk:AirshipJungleman29 →I am reporting you: new section Tags: Reverted New topic
- 17:3217:32, 10 November 2024 diff hist +558 User talk:HistoryofIran →I am reporting you: new section Tags: Reverted New topic
- 17:0517:05, 10 November 2024 diff hist +1,359 Khwarazmian Empire If you have an objection for the official and academic sources I have added, state your objections on the talk page. Do not edit war Tags: Undo Reverted
- 17:0417:04, 10 November 2024 diff hist +628 User talk:HistoryofIran →If you have objections to the sourced information, state your objections on the talk page.: new section Tags: Reverted New topic
- 17:0217:02, 10 November 2024 diff hist +1,917 User talk:HistoryofIran →November 2024: new section Tags: Reverted New topic
- 14:2214:22, 10 November 2024 diff hist +1,359 Khwarazmian Empire If you are the one disputing, raise your objection at the talk page: Official government website and Academic paper sources are there. First, raise objections to those sources, then demand consensus Tags: Undo Reverted
- 14:2014:20, 10 November 2024 diff hist +379 User talk:AirshipJungleman29 →Look at the last case:: Reply Tag: Reply
- 11:3811:38, 10 November 2024 diff hist +1,359 Khwarazmian Empire it is not a disputed content: where is your objection for the official government website source and the academic source? Raise your objections first then demand consensus Tags: Undo Reverted
- 06:4706:47, 10 November 2024 diff hist 0 User talk:AirshipJungleman29 Minor: amended a mistake. Context > Sentence
- 06:4406:44, 10 November 2024 diff hist +58 Khwarazmian Empire →Culture: Minor: Added external link to the academic article cited as source Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- 06:4106:41, 10 November 2024 diff hist +1,301 Khwarazmian Empire If you have any objection, state it in the talk page first. Then demand consensus Tags: Undo Reverted Disambiguation links added
- 06:4006:40, 10 November 2024 diff hist +415 User talk:AirshipJungleman29 →Look at the last case:: Reply Tag: Reply
9 November 2024
- 19:0719:07, 9 November 2024 diff hist +551 User talk:AirshipJungleman29 →Look at the last case:: Reply Tag: Reply
- 06:1006:10, 9 November 2024 diff hist +226 User talk:176.88.165.232 No edit summary
8 November 2024
- 20:3720:37, 8 November 2024 diff hist +1 Khwarazmian Empire Minor: Anadolu >>> Anatolia Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- 20:3520:35, 8 November 2024 diff hist +1,279 User talk:AirshipJungleman29 →Look at the last case:: new section Tag: New topic
- 20:3120:31, 8 November 2024 diff hist +484 Khwarazmian Empire →Culture: added more corraborative info Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- 20:2520:25, 8 November 2024 diff hist +56 Khwarazmian Empire →Culture: kinda minor: added small info Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- 20:2220:22, 8 November 2024 diff hist +760 Khwarazmian Empire With-in this edit, Buniyatov's assertion is corraborated by an OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT website. This contribution can not be deleted challenging Buniyatov's prestige, no matter it is RSOPINION or a fact Tags: Undo Reverted
- 20:0620:06, 8 November 2024 diff hist +598 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Is the following statement WP:RSOPINION?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 19:5419:54, 8 November 2024 diff hist +352 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Is the following statement WP:RSOPINION?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 18:0018:00, 8 November 2024 diff hist +601 Jalal al-Din Mangburni →Legacy and assessment: - added medieval contemporary report which I thought served the context: Ibn Wasil acknowleding Jalal al-Din being buffer zone between the Mongols and the Muslims current Tag: Visual edit
- 17:4617:46, 8 November 2024 diff hist +1,622 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Is the following statement WP:RSOPINION?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 17:3617:36, 8 November 2024 diff hist +1,214 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Is the following statement WP:RSOPINION?: Reply Tag: Reply
7 November 2024
- 18:5118:51, 7 November 2024 diff hist +747 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Is the following statement WP:RSOPINION?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 18:4618:46, 7 November 2024 diff hist +403 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Is the following statement WP:RSOPINION?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 18:4118:41, 7 November 2024 diff hist +471 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Is the following statement WP:RSOPINION?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 05:5605:56, 7 November 2024 diff hist +377 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Is the following statement WP:RSOPINION?: Reply Tag: Reply
6 November 2024
- 15:4615:46, 6 November 2024 diff hist +280 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Is the following statement WP:RSOPINION?: Reply Tag: Reply
5 November 2024
- 22:5022:50, 5 November 2024 diff hist +804 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Is the following statement WP:RSOPINION?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 20:3420:34, 5 November 2024 diff hist +1,165 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Is the following statement WP:RSOPINION?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 19:2619:26, 5 November 2024 diff hist +437 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Is the following statement WP:RSOPINION?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 19:0419:04, 5 November 2024 diff hist −43 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard minor edit: deleted repeating meaning
- 19:0219:02, 5 November 2024 diff hist +2,761 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Is the following statement WP:RSOPINION?: new section Tag: New topic
- 18:4118:41, 5 November 2024 diff hist +319 Talk:Khwarazmian Empire →CLEAN DISCUSSION FOR THIRD OPINION: WP:RSOPINION, HISTORY AND ETHNOLOGY: Reply Tag: Reply
4 November 2024
- 18:5018:50, 4 November 2024 diff hist +282 Wikipedia:Teahouse →Does this paraphrasement meet WP:RSOPINION?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 17:4317:43, 4 November 2024 diff hist +1,560 Wikipedia:Teahouse →Does this paraphrasement meet WP:RSOPINION?: new section Tag: New topic