User contributions for 174.46.113.209

11 August 2010

• 22:0822:08, 11 August 2010 diff hist −67 Principal (commercial law) No edit summary

6 August 2010

• 16:4816:48, 6 August 2010 diff hist +7 Hollingsworth v. Perry →Political strength

27 June 2010

• 01:5501:55, 27 June 2010 diff hist +355 User talk:174.46.113.209 block
• 01:5101:51, 27 June 2010 diff hist +4,954 User talk:174.46.113.209 unblock requests
• 00:4700:47, 27 June 2010 diff hist +561 Talk:Canada →Call to stop censoring article about Canada
• 00:3800:38, 27 June 2010 diff hist +1,875 Canada Again, no justification provided for censorship. See discussion page for detailed analysis of why this addition belongs here. Moxy repeatedly removing content w/o cause.
• 00:3400:34, 27 June 2010 diff hist +669 User talk:174.46.113.209 →The three-revert rule
• 00:2900:29, 27 June 2010 diff hist +1,111 Talk:Canada →Call to stop censoring article about Canada
• 00:2100:21, 27 June 2010 diff hist +1,875 Canada Removal of content must be justified. Prior undo offered no justification. Prior undo is vandalism. See discussion page for details.
• 00:1700:17, 27 June 2010 diff hist +180 User talk:174.46.113.209 →Response
• 00:1500:15, 27 June 2010 diff hist +152 User:Miesianiacal No edit summary
• 00:1400:14, 27 June 2010 diff hist +1,105 User talk:174.46.113.209 response
• 00:0500:05, 27 June 2010 diff hist +1,875 Canada Already settled on talk page. Please read that page before making changes. Settled as "remaining until compromised is accepted." Specifics of compromise open to negotiation, but not censorship.

26 June 2010

• 23:5223:52, 26 June 2010 diff hist +1,876 Canada See discussion page for offered compromised. If the compromised is accepted, I'll move this text to its own page. Until then it must remain here.
• 23:4923:49, 26 June 2010 diff hist +3,269 Talk:Canada Compromised offered
• 23:1423:14, 26 June 2010 diff hist 0 Talk:Canada Correct typo: 1965 --> 1865
• 23:0723:07, 26 June 2010 diff hist +2,170 User:Moxy Stop vandalizing Canada article
• 22:5222:52, 26 June 2010 diff hist −1,579 User talk:174.46.113.209 response
• 22:4222:42, 26 June 2010 diff hist −283 User talk:174.46.113.209 →May 2010
• 22:3722:37, 26 June 2010 diff hist +1,647 Talk:Canada Call to stop censorship
• 22:2222:22, 26 June 2010 diff hist +1,875 Canada Feel free to add something to G8 if you like, but secret laws that fundamentally change Canada's legal system is more relevant to Canadian Law than to G8. Scope is way beyond G20, that's the point.
• 10:2910:29, 26 June 2010 diff hist +1,875 Canada "No need for this" is a pretty lame excuse to vandalizes an article by censoring an important current event that fundamentally changes the nature of law in Canada. Lawyers across Canada disagree.
• 08:4908:49, 26 June 2010 diff hist +1,875 Canada Added section on new law that most people are not aware of, but must be made aware of to avoid arrest. It is absolutely critical that people know about the laws they are expected to obey. Refs cited

25 June 2010

• 23:5323:53, 25 June 2010 diff hist +42 Ralph Hall Previous wording leads reader to believe opposite of what the motion stated. Clarified motion's objective to avoid misleading reader. Backed up clarification with reference to a a respected journal. Tag: possible BLP issue or vandalism
• 23:4323:43, 25 June 2010 diff hist +3,307 Talk:Ralph Hall →Why the removal of detail about the party switch?

23 June 2010

• 18:5318:53, 23 June 2010 diff hist −61 Naenara Removed reference to korea-dpr.com. Naenara and Korea-dpr.com are not realted in any way. Korea-dpr.com is run by the Korean Friendship Assn. in Spain and Naenara was run by the Chongryon in Japan.

20 May 2010

• 20:3520:35, 20 May 2010 diff hist +12,443 Talk:Ralph Hall Discussion

17 May 2010

• 20:0920:09, 17 May 2010 diff hist +705 Ralph Hall No Dick, this is about using porn to stop education. Hiding that is not acceptable. Removing the source references that others demanded is not acceptable. My words are already neutral. Tag: references removed
• 19:3419:34, 17 May 2010 diff hist +497 User talk:174.46.113.209 →May 2010
• 19:3019:30, 17 May 2010 diff hist +956 User talk:174.46.113.209 →May 2010
• 19:2219:22, 17 May 2010 diff hist +1,437 Ralph Hall Notice that I did NOT delete Bill's additions, but I've added the fact back using what Bill calls "neutral language". Bill, why did you omit the original fact? Tag: possible BLP issue or vandalism
• 18:5418:54, 17 May 2010 diff hist +874 User talk:174.46.113.209 No edit summary
• 18:4718:47, 17 May 2010 diff hist +1,099 Ralph Hall Reverting vandalism by Uncle Bill. I notice they stopped trying to give disingenuous reasons. Tag: possible BLP issue or vandalism
• 18:4418:44, 17 May 2010 diff hist +1,424 User talk:174.46.113.209 No edit summary
• 18:3118:31, 17 May 2010 diff hist +1,099 Ralph Hall Facts, by definition, are NPOV. The position in article is based on current article format (by date). I noticed you removed instead of moved. This is bad faith censorship. Stop working for your boss. Tag: possible BLP issue or vandalism
• 18:1018:10, 17 May 2010 diff hist +1,099 Ralph Hall Making link bot happy Tag: possible BLP issue or vandalism
• 18:0218:02, 17 May 2010 diff hist +1,264 Ralph Hall Oh I see, you are saying I didn't have ENOUGH reference. OK, here's 10 more. I can add another 100 if you'd like. There: 11 references for one sentence. Tag: possible BLP issue or vandalism
• 18:0118:01, 17 May 2010 diff hist −289 User talk:174.46.113.209 No edit summary
• 18:0118:01, 17 May 2010 diff hist +1,108 User talk:174.46.113.209 →May 2010
• 17:2717:27, 17 May 2010 diff hist +258 Ralph Hall The change is a hard-core fact and is properly referenced. Reverting the change w/o explaination is clear vandalism, no matter how many cronies do it. Tag: possible BLP issue or vandalism
• 17:1617:16, 17 May 2010 diff hist +258 Ralph Hall Stating a fact regarding a politician changing a legal bill is NOT vandalism. Removing this fact to hide it from the public IS vandalism and censorship. Tag: possible BLP issue or vandalism
• 17:1117:11, 17 May 2010 diff hist +290 User talk:174.46.113.209 →May 2010
• 17:0217:02, 17 May 2010 diff hist +258 Ralph Hall →Political career: How long until someone tries to censor this? An encyclopedia that omits critical facts is worse than worthless. Tag: possible BLP issue or vandalism

16 April 2010

• 18:2318:23, 16 April 2010 diff hist −12 Roger Herft infobox format slightly fixed

7 April 2010

• 14:5514:55, 7 April 2010 diff hist 0 Tommy Franks "Birth date and age" in infobox has month first, but incorrectly said "df=yes"

24 January 2010

• 19:5919:59, 24 January 2010 diff hist +264 Talk:Visual Studio No edit summary
• 19:5719:57, 24 January 2010 diff hist +2,358 Visual Studio See discussion page. If an article on a compiler can't have a technical section, then the article is a joke.
• 19:5519:55, 24 January 2010 diff hist +1,091 Talk:Visual Studio Note to Zr40

21 January 2010

• 19:4419:44, 21 January 2010 diff hist +2,293 Visual Studio →Pre-installed virtual machines