User contributions for 173.77.248.223

9 May 2022

• 13:4913:49, 9 May 2022 diff hist +1‎ Rob McElhenney ‎ →‎Body: I guess this is how you split paragraphs? Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 13:4713:47, 9 May 2022 diff hist 0‎ Rob McElhenney ‎ →‎Body: Split paragraph. This is not part of the previous thought (at all; in any fashion) and so requires a new paragraph. This article is very poorly edited, btw Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 13:4513:45, 9 May 2022 diff hist +12‎ Rob McElhenney ‎ →‎Personal life: Broke off material into new section . Previous placement made little to no sense and was unreadable Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

4 May 2022

• 09:5709:57, 4 May 2022 diff hist +121‎ Talk:Amber Heard ‎ →‎Why is the change.org petition in the lead?: new section

1 May 2022

• 03:3603:36, 1 May 2022 diff hist −4‎ The Apprentice ‎ c/e Tag: Reverted
• 03:3603:36, 1 May 2022 diff hist +1‎ The Apprentice ‎ tweak description Tag: Reverted

30 April 2022

• 16:5616:56, 30 April 2022 diff hist −35‎ Asmongold ‎ why is this tag here? article has plenty of sources considering its length, do you want 100 sources in a 2 paragraph article?

22 April 2022

• 17:4817:48, 22 April 2022 diff hist +1‎ Talk:Donald Trump ‎No edit summary
• 17:4617:46, 22 April 2022 diff hist +148‎ Talk:Donald Trump ‎ proof of trump's obesity
• 17:4017:40, 22 April 2022 diff hist +246‎ Talk:Donald Trump ‎ I do not believe this for a second→‎Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 21 April 2022
• 13:0313:03, 22 April 2022 diff hist +290‎ Putinism ‎ clarify Tag: Reverted

21 April 2022

• 03:1403:14, 21 April 2022 diff hist +232‎ Talk:Donald Trump ‎ →‎RfC: Should the lead section have any citations?
• 03:0903:09, 21 April 2022 diff hist +12‎ Talk:Donald Trump ‎ →‎RfC: Should the lead section have any citations?
• 03:0503:05, 21 April 2022 diff hist −4‎ Talk:Donald Trump ‎ →‎RfC: Should the lead section have any citations?: my vote is with yes
• 03:0303:03, 21 April 2022 diff hist +218‎ Talk:Donald Trump ‎No edit summary