User contributions for 146.115.183.91
For 146.115.183.91 talk block log logs filter log
7 November 2023
- 05:2705:27, 7 November 2023 diff hist −920 Star Wars: The High Republic Bounding Into Comics is not a reliable source by Wikipedia standards. Deleted conclusions from "Star Wars Is a Dead Brand" article. Tags: Reverted references removed
- 05:2505:25, 7 November 2023 diff hist +326 Talk:Star Wars: The High Republic →Source for Reception?: Reply Tag: Reply
3 May 2021
- 05:0705:07, 3 May 2021 diff hist −1,913 Pablo Hidalgo Undid revision 1021149756 by SunDawn (talk) I recommend the user read the guidelines for biographies of living persons. It is their responsibility to seek consensus before reinstating the content. This is explicit in the guidelines. There is no requirement to seek consensus before deleting content, per BeBold. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 04:5504:55, 3 May 2021 diff hist −1,913 Pablo Hidalgo Undid revision 1021148853 by SunDawn (talk) “Unexplained content removal” is not a valid reason for edit-warring, especially when explanations have been provided here and on the Talk page. Get consensus there before reverting. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 04:5004:50, 3 May 2021 diff hist −1,913 Pablo Hidalgo Undid revision 1021142783 by Nemov (talk) User Nemov has now violated the three-revert rule by undoing my edits three times. The user should be reminded that no consensus is required before deleting content, though consensus is explicitly required before reinstating it. I suggest user Nemov make his case for reverting on the Talk page. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 04:4704:47, 3 May 2021 diff hist +531 Talk:Pablo Hidalgo →Non-notable content
- 03:2703:27, 3 May 2021 diff hist −1,913 Pablo Hidalgo Undid revision 1021139003 by Nemov (talk) The guidelines are clear that a user must seek consensus before restoring deleted material. I suggest the user read the guidelines on living persons. It is the responsibility of whoever would restore the content to seek consensus in the Talk page (where there is clearly no consensus), not the deleter. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 03:2303:23, 3 May 2021 diff hist +423 Talk:Pablo Hidalgo No edit summary
- 03:0503:05, 3 May 2021 diff hist −1,913 Pablo Hidalgo Undid revision 1021018632 by Nemov (talk) “If [deleted material on living persons] is to be restored without significant change, consensus must be obtained first.” User did not seek or obtain consensus. Additionally, *several* high-quality sources are required for inclusion in articles about living persons. Tags: Undo Reverted
2 May 2021
- 05:2905:29, 2 May 2021 diff hist −777 Star Wars Theory →Pablo Hidalgo Controversy: The sources for this section are not legitimate. The viewpoint does not display neutrality (Hidalgo did not “mock” the YouTuber. A Twitter spat from six months previous is not notable by the standards of biographies of living persons. Tags: Reverted section blanking
- 05:0805:08, 2 May 2021 diff hist −1,913 Pablo Hidalgo →Disney's acquisition of Lucasfilm: A Twitter spat from six months ago is not notable by the standards of biographies of living persons. Other biographical articles do not list every social-media fracas a notable person is involved in, even if they received transitory media coverage. Tags: Manual revert Reverted
- 05:0305:03, 2 May 2021 diff hist −1,913 Pablo Hidalgo →Disney's acquisition of Lucasfilm: A transient Twitter spat is not a notable event in anyone’s biography. Other articles about public figures do not list every social media flap they trigger. Tags: Manual revert Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 04:5404:54, 2 May 2021 diff hist −1,913 Pablo Hidalgo →Disney's acquisition of Lucasfilm: Removed non-notable content. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
6 March 2019
- 05:5405:54, 6 March 2019 diff hist −124 Domus Aurea Undid revision 881882437 by 5.148.39.106 (talk) Tag: Undo