User contributions for 128.59.171.194
For 128.59.171.194 talk block log logs filter log
22 April 2014
- 19:4719:47, 22 April 2014 diff hist +75 Hubble Space Telescope No edit summary
22 December 2011
- 21:1021:10, 22 December 2011 diff hist +181 User talk:128.59.171.194 No edit summary
- 21:0721:07, 22 December 2011 diff hist +379 User talk:128.59.171.194 No edit summary
- 18:4918:49, 22 December 2011 diff hist −5 User talk:128.59.171.194 →Arbitration enforcement block
- 18:4918:49, 22 December 2011 diff hist −3 User talk:128.59.171.194 →Arbitration enforcement block
- 18:4918:49, 22 December 2011 diff hist +133 User talk:128.59.171.194 →Arbitration enforcement block
- 18:4718:47, 22 December 2011 diff hist +237 User talk:128.59.171.194 →Arbitration enforcement block
9 December 2011
- 17:3217:32, 9 December 2011 diff hist −351 User talk:128.59.171.194 Undid revision 464979632 by Moonriddengirl (talk) sorry!
- 17:3117:31, 9 December 2011 diff hist +216 User talk:Moonriddengirl →Apologies: new section
- 16:5416:54, 9 December 2011 diff hist +4 Force →Normal force
- 16:5316:53, 9 December 2011 diff hist +9 Force →Non-fundamental forces
- 02:5802:58, 9 December 2011 diff hist +686 Lagrangian →Explanation: text unabashedly stolen from the talkpage from JRSpriggs and reused here.
- 02:5202:52, 9 December 2011 diff hist −19 Lagrangian →Advantages over other methods: remove field theory notation.
- 02:2302:23, 9 December 2011 diff hist −10,404 User talk:128.59.171.194 ←Replaced content with '{{Shared IP edu}}'
- 02:1702:17, 9 December 2011 diff hist +479 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement →Discussion concerning VanishedUser314159
8 December 2011
- 21:5421:54, 8 December 2011 diff hist +582 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →User:AnnaBennett making allegations that I am being 'bought' via a ' secret government contract'.
- 16:3716:37, 8 December 2011 diff hist +1,233 Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories →Other fringe theories besides pseudoscience: r
- 16:3216:32, 8 December 2011 diff hist +645 User talk:128.59.171.194 →Middle ground
7 December 2011
- 23:0123:01, 7 December 2011 diff hist +658 Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories →Other fringe theories besides pseudoscience: it's not just the existence of sources: it's also what the sources say.
- 18:4818:48, 7 December 2011 diff hist +107 Emotional Freedom Techniques fix intro...
- 18:4418:44, 7 December 2011 diff hist +1,584 Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard →Talk:Emotional Freedom Technique
- 17:4217:42, 7 December 2011 diff hist +469 Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard →Transhumanism?: r
- 17:1217:12, 7 December 2011 diff hist +199 User talk:128.59.171.194 →Middle ground: r
- 16:1316:13, 7 December 2011 diff hist +5,148 Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories →Other fringe theories besides pseudoscience
- 15:1915:19, 7 December 2011 diff hist +864 User talk:128.59.171.194 →Middle ground
5 December 2011
- 16:2116:21, 5 December 2011 diff hist +838 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CETI Patterson Power Cell (2nd nomination) No edit summary
2 December 2011
- 20:4120:41, 2 December 2011 diff hist +214 User talk:AndyTheGrump →Unblocked
- 20:4020:40, 2 December 2011 diff hist +452 User talk:N419BH →Barts1a: new section
- 20:3820:38, 2 December 2011 diff hist +366 User talk:Barts1a/Yell No edit summary
- 20:3020:30, 2 December 2011 diff hist +624 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CETI Patterson Power Cell (2nd nomination) →CETI Patterson Power Cell
- 20:2520:25, 2 December 2011 diff hist +352 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CETI Patterson Power Cell (2nd nomination) →CETI Patterson Power Cell
- 14:5914:59, 2 December 2011 diff hist −321 Patterson power cell removing conference proceeding: unreliable source.
- 14:5714:57, 2 December 2011 diff hist +1,316 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CETI Patterson Power Cell (2nd nomination) →CETI Patterson Power Cell: r
1 December 2011
- 23:5223:52, 1 December 2011 diff hist −117 Patterson power cell Not verifiably any of these except for fringe physics.
- 23:5023:50, 1 December 2011 diff hist −283 Patterson power cell →Replications: This is not a peer-reviewed paper and, worse, it is the provenance of the wacky IAS out of Austin, Texas. Not a reliable source, I'm afraid. Sorry.
- 23:4623:46, 1 December 2011 diff hist +3 Patterson power cell there is no source that states this is an "electrolysis" device. The claims of "cold fusion" are properly claims and should be couched as such.
- 23:1423:14, 1 December 2011 diff hist +202 User talk:128.59.171.194 →List of UFO sightings
- 22:3622:36, 1 December 2011 diff hist +658 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CETI Patterson Power Cell (2nd nomination) →CETI Patterson Power Cell
- 22:2522:25, 1 December 2011 diff hist +730 Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard →No scientific consensus on UFOs?
- 18:1818:18, 1 December 2011 diff hist +824 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CETI Patterson Power Cell (2nd nomination) →CETI Patterson Power Cell
- 00:5800:58, 1 December 2011 diff hist +500 Talk:Unidentified flying object →Remove the second picture please: new section
- 00:5000:50, 1 December 2011 diff hist +4 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CETI Patterson Power Cell (2nd nomination) →CETI Patterson Power Cell
- 00:5000:50, 1 December 2011 diff hist +809 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CETI Patterson Power Cell (2nd nomination) →CETI Patterson Power Cell
30 November 2011
- 23:4623:46, 30 November 2011 diff hist +386 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CETI Patterson Power Cell (2nd nomination) →CETI Patterson Power Cell: r
- 23:3123:31, 30 November 2011 diff hist +491 User talk:AndyTheGrump →Only Warning
- 23:1523:15, 30 November 2011 diff hist +234 User talk:Master of Puppets →Punitive: new section
- 23:0723:07, 30 November 2011 diff hist +448 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CETI Patterson Power Cell (2nd nomination) No edit summary
- 01:1201:12, 30 November 2011 diff hist +904 Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard →No scientific consensus on UFOs?
29 November 2011
- 02:3902:39, 29 November 2011 diff hist 0 Redshift →Measurement, characterization, and interpretation: punc inside.
- 02:3802:38, 29 November 2011 diff hist −509 Redshift →Measurement, characterization, and interpretation: Okay, I think this is fixed now. The Doppler Effect article is a bit more clear and we don't need to bounce back-and-forth.