User contributions for 122.148.218.27

30 April 2009

• 02:3302:33, 30 April 2009 diff hist 0‎ Most Phallic Building contest ‎No edit summary

22 April 2009

• 07:3007:30, 22 April 2009 diff hist +6‎ Most Phallic Building contest ‎ Undid revision 285393001 by 75.38.20.144 (talk)

14 April 2009

• 23:3623:36, 14 April 2009 diff hist −305‎ Fahrenheit 9/11 controversies ‎ I will restore the relevant section, but your utter contempt for what I have said has made me unwilling to slowly fix it. It is easier to simply undo, then re-add your useful material
• 11:4811:48, 14 April 2009 diff hist +11‎ Talk:Fahrenheit 9/11 controversies ‎ →‎Alleged discrepancy on Osama's presumed innocence (again)

12 April 2009

• 10:4510:45, 12 April 2009 diff hist +40‎ Fahrenheit 9/11 controversies ‎ It is an update to the current time situation. It is certainly relevant and pertinent, and I'm afraid a better argument than "I don't think so" is needed.
• 08:1408:14, 12 April 2009 diff hist +40‎ Fahrenheit 9/11 controversies ‎ →‎Alleged discrepancy on Osama's presumed innocence
• 08:1408:14, 12 April 2009 diff hist −104‎ Fahrenheit 9/11 controversies ‎ →‎Alleged discrepancy on Osama's presumed innocence: The sentence had been repeated.

31 March 2009

• 04:5504:55, 31 March 2009 diff hist +60‎ User talk:122.148.218.27 ‎ →‎March 2009

30 March 2009

• 04:2604:26, 30 March 2009 diff hist −37‎ Mao Zedong ‎No edit summary
• 00:0000:00, 30 March 2009 diff hist −2‎ Most Phallic Building contest ‎ Erected is the more grammatically correct. You just dislike it because of the double meaning. It remains the most appropriate word to use, so that'll be the one that stays.

29 March 2009

• 01:2101:21, 29 March 2009 diff hist +78‎ N User talk:210.84.50.159 ‎ ←Created page with 'http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_ANU_Law_Revue'
• 01:0601:06, 29 March 2009 diff hist −2‎ Most Phallic Building contest ‎No edit summary

17 February 2009

• 00:2100:21, 17 February 2009 diff hist −121‎ Fahrenheit 9/11 controversies ‎ You've been warned on both this page and ray bradbury's not to insert unsourced, inaccurate, possibly OR material like this... stop, or I'll have your blocked.

7 February 2009

• 03:2303:23, 7 February 2009 diff hist −253‎ Fahrenheit 9/11 controversies ‎ Not only is "interesting" a bad characterisation, but you provide no source and I frankly doubt the validity of the claim as an "appropriation"

4 February 2009

• 04:2504:25, 4 February 2009 diff hist −2‎ Most Phallic Building contest ‎No edit summary

30 January 2009

• 09:1209:12, 30 January 2009 diff hist −297‎ Larry Bird ‎ →‎Personal life: vandalism

27 January 2009

• 03:5503:55, 27 January 2009 diff hist +1‎ Lisa Leslie ‎ →‎International career/Olympic Career
• 03:5303:53, 27 January 2009 diff hist +19‎ Lisa Leslie ‎ →‎High School
• 02:1702:17, 27 January 2009 diff hist +64‎ Lisa Leslie ‎ →‎High School
• 02:1302:13, 27 January 2009 diff hist +80‎ Lisa Leslie ‎ →‎International career/Olympic Career
• 02:1102:11, 27 January 2009 diff hist +100‎ Lisa Leslie ‎ →‎International career/Olympic Career
• 02:0602:06, 27 January 2009 diff hist −110‎ Lisa Leslie ‎ →‎High School
• 02:0502:05, 27 January 2009 diff hist +427‎ Lisa Leslie ‎ →‎High School

26 January 2009

• 12:2812:28, 26 January 2009 diff hist +180‎ Lisa Leslie ‎ →‎High School
• 12:2612:26, 26 January 2009 diff hist +489‎ Lisa Leslie ‎ →‎High School
• 12:1712:17, 26 January 2009 diff hist +1,070‎ Lisa Leslie ‎ →‎High School: additions

20 January 2009

• 22:1422:14, 20 January 2009 diff hist +1,129‎ Fahrenheit 9/11 controversies ‎ Undid revision 264610832 by Jack5150 (talk)A content dispute means you can't just do stuff like this right now

1 January 2009

• 23:2923:29, 1 January 2009 diff hist +146‎ Talk:Fahrenheit 9/11 controversies ‎ →‎Factual Backup
• 23:2623:26, 1 January 2009 diff hist −35‎ Fahrenheit 9/11 controversies ‎ →‎Alleged discrepancy on Osama's presumed innocence
• 23:2523:25, 1 January 2009 diff hist −23‎ Fahrenheit 9/11 controversies ‎ →‎Controversy about the film's content: Not established.

22 December 2008

• 08:0508:05, 22 December 2008 diff hist +631‎ Talk:Fahrenheit 9/11 controversies ‎ →‎Negative reviews not in the article

18 December 2008

• 07:2107:21, 18 December 2008 diff hist +1,114‎ User talk:122.148.218.27 ‎No edit summary
• 02:0902:09, 18 December 2008 diff hist −58‎ Fahrenheit 9/11 controversies ‎ You're the one who is assuming that balance exists. You've provided no evidence this is true. The current version may just reflect reality. If not, get some sources. Are you trying to get banned?

17 December 2008

• 20:3120:31, 17 December 2008 diff hist −35‎ Fahrenheit 9/11 controversies ‎ →‎Alleged discrepancy on Osama's presumed innocence: Since you've refused to reply to the text I offered, I'm going to assume it's quell
• 20:2820:28, 17 December 2008 diff hist −23‎ Fahrenheit 9/11 controversies ‎ per before, pure assertion on your part. Against consensus. You assume balance exists, it may not, which is why it's inappropriate to tag.
• 02:5002:50, 17 December 2008 diff hist +336‎ Fahrenheit 9/11 controversies ‎ borderline vandalism, unless the content is disputed.
• 02:2102:21, 17 December 2008 diff hist +96‎ Talk:Fahrenheit 9/11 controversies ‎ →‎Unreliable sources
• 01:4501:45, 17 December 2008 diff hist −23‎ Fahrenheit 9/11 controversies ‎ Sorry, but you can't assert by yourself that the section DGG said was fine is unbalanced. Instrad of tagging it, just go get some sources. And remember, try to make it relevant to the controversy

16 December 2008

• 10:0310:03, 16 December 2008 diff hist +29‎ Fahrenheit 9/11 controversies ‎ →‎Controversy about the film's content
• 10:0110:01, 16 December 2008 diff hist −23‎ Fahrenheit 9/11 controversies ‎ →‎Controversy about the film's content: He does not single out Hitchens. OR on whoever wrote this.
• 09:5909:59, 16 December 2008 diff hist +176‎ Fahrenheit 9/11 controversies ‎ →‎Controversy about the film's content
• 06:3806:38, 16 December 2008 diff hist +626‎ Talk:Fahrenheit 9/11 controversies ‎ →‎My proposal

14 December 2008

• 01:1301:13, 14 December 2008 diff hist +168‎ User talk:Lar ‎ →‎NPOV

13 December 2008

• 01:2601:26, 13 December 2008 diff hist −35‎ Fahrenheit 9/11 controversies ‎ Wikipedia rules are not something you make up. You've proposed no alternative text, you were in the minority to begin with,and you haven't addressed the new text on the talk page. 3R warning methinks

12 December 2008

• 20:5220:52, 12 December 2008 diff hist −35‎ Fahrenheit 9/11 controversies ‎ →‎Alleged discrepancy on Osama's presumed innocence: You've had your chance for input. Talk page in future please.

10 December 2008

• 02:2802:28, 10 December 2008 diff hist +835‎ Talk:Fahrenheit 9/11 controversies ‎ →‎Writing for the enemy

8 December 2008

• 03:3503:35, 8 December 2008 diff hist +251‎ Talk:Fahrenheit 9/11 controversies ‎ →‎Disputed tag
• 03:3203:32, 8 December 2008 diff hist +5,514‎ Talk:Fahrenheit 9/11 controversies ‎ →‎Disputed tag

7 December 2008

• 10:3310:33, 7 December 2008 diff hist +1,533‎ Fahrenheit 9/11 controversies ‎ There is currently a content dispute whoever you are, and you just deleted content which has been the subject of intense debate. Don't
• 02:5602:56, 7 December 2008 diff hist −35‎ Fahrenheit 9/11 controversies ‎ Sorry, but you need to establish a real objection, not just vague complaints. You're also at 3R now, and the article should go back to the initial consensus article when there is a deadlock.