Jump to content

User contributions for 121.179.131.132

For 121.179.131.132 talk block log logs filter log
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

6 August 2021

5 August 2021

3 August 2021

22 December 2020

14 December 2020

22 July 2020

  • 23:4123:41, 22 July 2020 diff hist +1,352 Abstract object theoryNormalization against Omnipaedista’s repetitive intentional vandalism for hiding some previous fabricated citation. 'Primary Encyclopedic Published Academic Source Following Chicago Manual of Style' 'already in existent academic use' is 'not original research' at all. This false accusation for vandalism is cannot even applicable 'even in existent academic use.'
  • 23:3123:31, 22 July 2020 diff hist +8,668 Essence–energies distinctionOmnipaedista, you gain 'academic consensus' first, please before making your substantial vandalism. Did you give 'any academic reason or consensus' from 'Primary Encyclopedic Published Academic Source by Chicago Manual of Style' 'already in existent academic use' for your repetitive vandalism? If not, your grave such blanking vandalism standard even unapplicable in academia should be forbidden.
  • 08:1508:15, 22 July 2020 diff hist +26,568 Hypostasis (philosophy and religion)Normalization against Omnipaedista’s repetitive vandalism on Early Christian Patristic literatures from Catholic New Advent Link Information Sharing and Primary Encyclopedic Published Academic Source by Chicago Manual of Style without any academic reason or academic consensus from Primary Encyclopedic Published Academic Source by Chicago Manual of Style in existent academic use.
  • 05:1205:12, 22 July 2020 diff hist +1,352 Abstract object theoryOmnipaedista, you gain 'academic consensus' first, please before making your substantial vandalism. Did you give any Primary Encyclopedic Published Academic Source Following Chicago Manual of Style for your repetitive unreasoned vandalism? If any, please give 'any academic reason' for blanking vandalism 'from Primary Encyclopedic Published Academic Source by Chicago Manual of Style' 'in existent academic use.
  • 04:0304:03, 22 July 2020 diff hist +1,311 Deontic logicOmnipaedista, you gain 'academic consensus' first, please before making your substantial vandalism. These front parts are all 'unquestionably academic consensus on Georg Henrik von Wright's deontic logic' came from Primary Encyclopedic Published Academic Source Following Chicago Manual of Style in existent academic use. Can you give any academic reason for your repetitive blanking vandalism of front section from the very same standard?
  • 03:5303:53, 22 July 2020 diff hist +26,568 Hypostasis (philosophy and religion)MattMauler, you gain 'academic consensus' first, please before making your substantial vandalism. These changes are all following 'Primary Encyclopedic Published Academic Source by Chicago Manual of Style' 'in existent academic use' except for just Early Christian patristic literatures for knowledge sharing all came from Catholic New Advent link. If any, please give any reason for blanking vandalism 'from academic reason' please against the very strict academic standard already in existent use'.
  • 03:2803:28, 22 July 2020 diff hist +8,668 Essence–energies distinctionOmnipaedista, you gain 'academic consensus' first, please before making your substantial vandalism. Did you give any Primary Encyclopedic Published Academic Source Following Chicago Manual of Style for your repetitive unreasoned vandalism? If 'Primary Encyclopedic Published Academic Source Following Chicago Manual of Style' were also wrong, it means that your standard cannot be universally applicable 'even in academia'.

21 July 2020

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)