User contributions for 111.223.26.156

30 March 2021

• 08:3508:35, 30 March 2021 diff hist +176 Talk:Al Jazeera controversies and criticism →Invitation to editors objecting to the “ownership” clause: 2nd correction

29 March 2021

• 02:2902:29, 29 March 2021 diff hist +185 Talk:Al Jazeera controversies and criticism →Invitation to editors objecting to the “ownership” clause: Typo correction
• 02:2702:27, 29 March 2021 diff hist +4,866 Talk:Al Jazeera controversies and criticism →Invitation to editors objecting to the “ownership” clause: Replied concisely

28 March 2021

• 20:5920:59, 28 March 2021 diff hist +47 Al Jazeera controversies and criticism Undid revision 1014737343 by NZFC (talk): If you're a good-faith editor unlike most who lurk around these articles, see talk-page. Why should I bother providing replacement for each-&-every source when I'm only changing the noun “owner”-related terminology to a more clear one? If I would've to make such an extra-effort, what's to stop me at not transforming the whole lead, either? Yet, that's not my goal yet. I just wish to start MINOR Tags: Undo Reverted
• 20:5320:53, 28 March 2021 diff hist +2,155 Talk:Al Jazeera controversies and criticism →Invitation to editors objecting to the “ownership” clause: new section
• 20:2520:25, 28 March 2021 diff hist +47 Al Jazeera controversies and criticism Undid revision 1014691004 by Edipio (talk): Which “sources”? Most of them are outdated op-eds dating back to at least chaotic period of Arab Spring, if not 2009.( Prior to the restructure.) Some are outdated, few of them to the extent that they're 404. And about Der Spiegel also: Overall WP: EXTRAORDINARY applies. Remember, this is not an article mainly about its “ownership”, this is an article which was spun-off from a section. Tags: Undo Reverted
• 13:4513:45, 28 March 2021 diff hist +1,984 User talk:Edipio →You shouldn't have reverted at Al Jazeera controversies and criticism: new section
• 13:1913:19, 28 March 2021 diff hist +47 Al Jazeera controversies and criticism Undid revision 1013347656 by Fanardal (talk): I dunno why you changed it, Edipio BUT while that's not-so-shocking given my life-experience, you should know that this newbie's engagement with WP:DE has been in-line with the pattern of other newbie and IP editors with eerily-similar behavioral-pattern across sister-articles and even remotely-linked articles. I've been dealing with these for at least over a month. On UTP Tags: Undo Reverted