User contributions for 109.78.225.37

21 October 2017

• 23:5623:56, 21 October 2017 diff hist +132‎ Talk:SMILF ‎No edit summary
• 20:3520:35, 21 October 2017 diff hist +375‎ N Talk:SMILF ‎ What does the title mean
• 20:3020:30, 21 October 2017 diff hist +4‎ Frankie Shaw ‎ There does not seem to be a page for the short film SMILF but there is a page for the television series SMILF which seems to have aired 1 episode
• 20:2820:28, 21 October 2017 diff hist +15‎ Frankie Shaw ‎ WP:RELTIME don't say "currently". Be specific, say when or leave it out.
• 16:1316:13, 21 October 2017 diff hist +13‎ Geostorm ‎No edit summary
• 05:3705:37, 21 October 2017 diff hist +14‎ File:Geostorm official teaser poster.jpg ‎ Source is dead. Is this poster available from elsewhere yet? Need a bigger version so I can write a decent WP:ALT alternative description for accessibility.
• 05:3505:35, 21 October 2017 diff hist +32‎ Geostorm ‎ Both Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic scores are based on reviews, it makes no sense to claim Metacritic scores are "based on N critics"
• 01:0701:07, 21 October 2017 diff hist +66‎ Boo! A Madea Halloween ‎ The Cinemascore main page is a searchbox so linking to it is only slighltly less useless than linking to Google. Box Office Mojo link includes Cinemascore instead.
• 01:0301:03, 21 October 2017 diff hist −140‎ Boo! A Madea Halloween ‎ WP:FILMPLOT "The film begins" they all do, and with the restricted word count it doesn't make any sense to point that out. Copyedit for brevity.
• 00:5600:56, 21 October 2017 diff hist −100‎ Boo 2! A Madea Halloween ‎ Medae is critic-proof. Also use named references instead of repeating references.
• 00:4400:44, 21 October 2017 diff hist +13‎ Only the Brave (2017 film) ‎ scores are based on reviews.
• 00:4000:40, 21 October 2017 diff hist +16‎ Boo 2! A Madea Halloween ‎ infobox use the same indent consistently. WP:OVERLINK don't link review aggregator as Rotten Tomatoes is already linked.
• 00:3700:37, 21 October 2017 diff hist +4‎ Geostorm ‎ incorrect use of citation parameter. Metacritic is a website, the publisher (not needed) is CBS Interactive
• 00:3400:34, 21 October 2017 diff hist +10‎ Geostorm ‎ WP:OVERLINK Rotten Tomatoes already linked if anyone needs to know what it is. Also bump figures.

20 October 2017

• 23:1123:11, 20 October 2017 diff hist +1,593‎ Talk:Side Effects (2013 film) ‎ →‎Music: new section
• 22:5422:54, 20 October 2017 diff hist −89‎ Side Effects (2013 film) ‎ Maybe the soundtrack is notable? Soundtrack review link in the External links section doesn't make any sense if the article doesn't include any information about the soundtrack (although ideally it would be an inline reference, not an external link)
• 22:4622:46, 20 October 2017 diff hist −4‎ Modern Arnis ‎ WP:RELTIME don't say currently.
• 22:4422:44, 20 October 2017 diff hist +40‎ Modern Arnis ‎ will be in 2010? it is now 2017, text needs an update.
• 22:3622:36, 20 October 2017 diff hist −2,379‎ User talk:109.78.225.37 ‎ Thanks but no ... WP:WNCAA
• 22:3522:35, 20 October 2017 diff hist +3‎ Pootie Tang ‎ Rotten Tomatoes 29% based on 42 reviews.
• 22:3322:33, 20 October 2017 diff hist 0‎ Pootie Tang ‎ Spelling
• 22:2722:27, 20 October 2017 diff hist 0‎ Manhattan (1979 film) ‎ Glanced at wrong Tab, it was actually 57 reviews.
• 22:1722:17, 20 October 2017 diff hist +41‎ Manhattan (1979 film) ‎ Not sure Rotten Tomatoes is all that relevant considering it didn't exist until roughly 20 years after this film came out but the number of reviews used to create the score should be listed.
• 22:1322:13, 20 October 2017 diff hist −4‎ I Love You, Daddy ‎ Publisher parameter misused again (publishers would be Flixster and CBS Interactive respectively)
• 22:1122:11, 20 October 2017 diff hist +9‎ I Love You, Daddy ‎ WP:OVERLINK Rotten Tomatoes already linked if anyone needs to know what it is.
• 22:0722:07, 20 October 2017 diff hist −143‎ Amber Tamblyn ‎ Jokes are fine but this is still supposed to be an encyclopedia and it there is nothing to indicate the joke is particularly WP:NOTABLE
• 22:0222:02, 20 October 2017 diff hist −7‎ James Woods ‎ The characters name is Sebastian Stark, the show title is Shark. Even if that is his nickname it's a bit of stretch to say it is "eponymous".
• 21:5821:58, 20 October 2017 diff hist −15‎ James Woods ‎ More than enough for the citation to say what the source was, and there's no need to repeat in the article text whether it was a Twitter message or on the front page of the New York Times.
• 21:5421:54, 20 October 2017 diff hist −22‎ Amber Tamblyn ‎ →‎Personal life: how is a joke about her daughters name appropriate or notable for an encyclopedia?
• 21:4421:44, 20 October 2017 diff hist −31‎ Jesse Alexander ‎ WP:RELTIME don't say recently, it makes no sense if this is supposed to be an encyclopedia. Say when if necessary otherwise leave it out.
• 21:3821:38, 20 October 2017 diff hist +8‎ The Gifted (American TV series) ‎ Writing is clearer with slightly less pronouns
• 21:2621:26, 20 October 2017 diff hist +8‎ Meru (film) ‎No edit summary
• 21:2321:23, 20 October 2017 diff hist −22‎ Meru (film) ‎ WP:MOSFILM Rotten Tomatoes audience voted scores are not a reliable source and user voted web polls are not acceptable either.
• 21:1921:19, 20 October 2017 diff hist −164‎ Swearnet: The Movie ‎ WP:MOSFILM Rotten Tomatoes audience voted scores are not a reliable source and user voted web polls are not acceptable either.
• 21:0721:07, 20 October 2017 diff hist −1‎ Hush (2016 film) ‎No edit summary
• 21:0621:06, 20 October 2017 diff hist +55‎ Hush (2016 film) ‎ That's very misleading to write "AudiencesEverywhere said" when in fact "Richard Newby of website Audiences Everywhere" said it and I am not even sure it is a reputable source worth mentioning.
• 20:5720:57, 20 October 2017 diff hist +2‎ Talk:Frontier (2016 TV series) ‎ →‎Critical reception
• 20:5720:57, 20 October 2017 diff hist +978‎ Talk:Frontier (2016 TV series) ‎ →‎Critical reception: new section
• 20:4720:47, 20 October 2017 diff hist −25‎ Frontier (2016 TV series) ‎ WP:TVRECEPTION Rotten Tomatoes critic scores only. Audiences scores are not allowed (WP:UGC and not a WP:RS). Either mixed or negative, pick one (since mixed covers both I'm going with mixed)
• 20:1420:14, 20 October 2017 diff hist +10‎ Life (2017 film) ‎ WP:OVERLINK Rotten Tomatoes already linked if anyone needs to know what it is.
• 20:0920:09, 20 October 2017 diff hist −24‎ Hocus Pocus (1993 film) ‎ WP:MOSFILM Rotten Tomatoes audience voted scores are not a reliable source and user voted web polls are not acceptable either. Mixed or negative pick one, avoid "mixed to negative"
• 19:4819:48, 20 October 2017 diff hist +1‎ Fat acceptance movement ‎ WP:RELTIME don't say currently. Be specific and say when if necessary. Otherwise avoid.